The Manila Times

Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Tuesday, July 08, 2008

 

MEN & EVENTS
By Alito L. Malinao
Same sex marriage

 
A wire report from Los Angeles, California, a couple of weeks ago said that a number of gay and lesbian couples have tied the knot as a result of the historic ruling by the California Supreme Court legalizing same sex marriage.

California is the second state in the US, after Massachusetts, to legalize same sex marriage. And San Francisco is the most gay-friendly city in the US.

A study conducted by the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shows that some 51,000 of the estimated 102,000 same sex couples living in California are expected to marry over the next three years with another 70,000 couples from other states to have their wedding in California.

A recent poll showed that 52 percent of Californians now support homosexual marriage compared to 41 who oppose it.

The decision of California’s high tribunal, which took effect last June 16, 2008, capped a long-running legal battle that started in 2000 when California voters approved a law specifically declaring that only a marriage between a man and a woman could be legally recognized.

Protected right

But in its decision, the court said that marriage is a basic civil right that applies to everyone, including those belonging to the third sex. It said that like race and gender, sexual preference of a person is a protected right.

However, a proposed constitutional amendment that would override the court’s decision will be submitted to California voters along with the national elections in November this year.

Both Senators John McCain and Barack Obama, the presumptive presidential candidates of their respective parties, have opposed same sex marriage but they also do not want a constitutional ban on such a union.    

The Roman Catholic Church has vigorously opposed such a union based on the Vatican’s unequivocal stance that marriage is a unique relationship between a man and a woman whose goal is to nurture and support a new life.

Not in the Philippines

Same sex marriage will never prosper in the Philippines for two reasons: one because of the strong Catholic upbringing of most Filipinos, and two, because Filipino homosexuals are far from united.

No politician would dare propose a legislation that would legalize this kind of marriage simply because this is anathema to the accepted norms and time-tested values of the Filipino people.

In the May 2007 elections, the Ang Ladlad, headed by Danton Remoto tried but failed get accreditation as a party-list group because it was unable to prove that it was a nationwide organization of the country’s lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgenders.

Remoto, a professor at the Ateneo de Manila University, said that they sought representation in Congress because they want an end to discrimination against their members.

But unlike in California and other American states, homosexuals here cannot seem to put up a unified front. Majority of them are closet gays and those who have come out in the open usually fought among each other.

$8 billion for mutts

Some are saying that same sex marriage is an outrageous phenomenon of our times. But here is a more outrageous piece of news.

The late American hotelier and real estate magnate Leona Helmsley has willed her entire trust, valued at $5 billion to $8 billion, an amount representing all her estate, including the Empire State building in New York, for the care and welfare of dogs.

The eccentric and bitchy (that probably explains her queer attachment to dogs) also left $12 million in her will to her dog, Trouble.

Instead of alleviating the conditions of millions who die of hunger and disease in Sudan, Somalia other countries in Africa and Asia, Helmsley decided to leave her vast wealth to the care of dogs.

This story reminded me of an old anecdote about a wealthy matron who wanted her dog, her lifetime companion, to be baptized. The matron brought her dog to a priest and asked that it be baptized.

Of course, the priest was aghast. How can a dog be baptized, the priest told the matron. But the matron insisted. “Father, I want my dog to have a name because when I die, she will be my sole heir,” the matron said.

The priest would not want anymore of the matron’s pleadings. So, he drove her away. But before leaving, the matron said: “If that’s the case, Father, I will just bring my dog to a temple and have her baptized there. And I would give the P5 million that I would like to donate to your church to the Buddhist monk.”

After hearing of the P5 million donation, the priest grabbed the dog from the matron and said: “Come here, come here, let’s baptize your dog. Why didn’t you tell me right away that your dog is a Roman Catholic.”

opinion@manilatimes.net

   
 

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: