The Manila Times

Regions

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Motoring

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

 

HARDTOP
By Vernon B. Sarne
Even Batman had to ditch the Batmobile


By Shell’s estimation, if all drivers on the face of planet Earth achieved this, it would translate to a savings of about 170 billion liters of fuel every year.

YOU know something is terribly amiss when even Batman switches from four wheels to two. In the latest film featuring the Caped Crusader—The Dark Knight, which opens in theaters this week—Batman discards the Batmobile in favor of the Batpod, a menacing motorbike that makes Harleys look like scooters. A sign of the times perhaps? I suspect so. And if somebody like Batman—who, as Bruce Wayne, is a billionaire—is so affected by the rising fuel costs that he makes the shift to two wheels, imagine how poor non-superheroes are coping with the crisis.

Rather comically, I suppose.

I, for one, have started observing new practices to adapt. For starters, I now leave behind my trusty iPod Hi-Fi speakers primarily because lugging around an extra 15 pounds in your car is not very helpful to fuel economy. I used to bring this audio gadget wherever I went, wishing to always be ready should an impromptu party be organized out of the blue. Not anymore. These days, a DJ isn’t such a necessity anymore for the simple reason there are not too many people in the mood to party. With fuel selling at 60 bucks a liter, even party animals would just rather stay home.

I’ve also removed the books, magazines and CDs scattered around my rear compartment. In fact, I would have gladly taken out my spare tire as well if only our wretched roads didn’t pose a constant threat to my tires. And just the other day, I decided to shave off my hair again—which I had been trying to grow back to its ’90s length and form—in the hopes that the disposal of even the seemingly insignificant weight of hair strands would help me achieve maximum fuel efficiency.

I love using my car and I shall cope with the fuel crisis not by leaving it at home, but by striving to use it in the most frugal means I could muster. I see that many people have taken to commuting, as evidenced by the lighter daytime traffic. And to digress, I think the MMDA should, for now, suspend the number-coding scheme because the roads are now less crowded. There is no better way to keep vehicles in garages than with high fuel prices. I say lift the vehicle coding scheme now.

Going back, I love my car and the convenience it offers. And to allow myself to keep using it in the face of Starbucks-like fuel costs, I need to be a much more economical driver. Which is why I’ve taken part in the Shell Fuel Save Challenge, a campaign by the oil company that aims to help drivers around the world lower their fuel consumption by at least 10 percent. By Shell’s estimation, if all drivers on the face of planet Earth achieved this, it would translate to a savings of about 170 billion liters of fuel every year.

Imagine that: An oil company whose profit is largely dependent on our fuel consumption actually wants us to consume less fuel. That’s like Marlboro launching a campaign that aims to treat smokers of their nicotine addiction. Which, we know, will never happen. The only reason cigarette companies print a health warning on their packaging is because they’re required by law to do so. I’m actually surprised that people still smoke even after being informed that smoking causes lung cancer. It’s the one product people willingly pay for to kill themselves, come to think of it.

But Shell is doing an entirely different thing. It’s voluntary—and with the full knowledge that teaching people how to drive more economically could eat into its bottom line. The Shell Fuel Save Challenge is a global campaign. In the Philippines, Shell has selected 200 private motorists to participate in the program, and I happen to be one of them.

The mechanics are quite simple. For four weeks, you are to use non-Shell fuel products and drive normally like you always have. You are to monitor your fuel consumption in that four-week period. After using non-Shell fuel products for a month, you are to undergo a one-day eco-driving seminar under the supervision of Shell and the A-1 Driving School. The seminar consists of classroom-type lessons as well as hands-on driving practicum.

On Saturday, while on the wheel of a new Toyota Altis, my A-1 instructor rated me highly after registering a 12.6-kilometer-to-a-liter mileage. My score sheet indicated I steered smoothly and that I shifted gears properly. My instructor’s only comment was that I had to “slow down when approaching intersections.”

When participants have taken the seminar, they shall then use P8,000 worth of Shell fuel and similarly monitor their consumption. If everything turns out the way it’s supposed to, the participants will realize how much they’ve improved economy-wise as drivers after taking part in the Shell Fuel Save Challenge. All the Shell fuel is generously provided by Shell, of course, and I have no doubt in my mind that most of those who joined are in it for the free gas. Can’t blame them. I’d do anything for fuel these days myself. Heck, I’d even work for fuel these days.

But seriously, I’m in it because I want to know if I can still make my car and my driving any more economical than they are now. It’s nice to know an oil company wants us to use less of its products, spend less of our money and consume less of the Earth’s resources.

   
 

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Ping Oco, Franklin Bartolay
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: