The Manila Times

Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Saturday, July 26, 2008

 

VIRTUAL REALITY
By Tony Lopez
Poverty worsening

 
Bad news. Poverty incidence worsened from 30 percent of total households in 2003 to 32.9 percent of households in 2006.

That 32.9 percent is even conservative. According to the Social Weather Stations (SWS), self-rated poverty was 53 percent of total households in 2007. According to Pulse Asia, self-rated poverty was 71 percent of Filipinos surveyed in March 2008.

An upsurge in official poverty incidence from 30 to 32.9 percent means poverty has been deteriorating at the rate of almost one percentage point (0.966) per month per year for the last three years. About 160,000 families cross the poverty line downward each year. At 5.5 persons per family, 160,000 families translate into 880,000 becoming poor each year. They do not earn $1 per person per day. This July, SWS found 16.3 percent (2.9 million families) experienced involuntary hunger at least once in the past three months. Average hunger rate in the past ten years has been 12.1 percent of families.

Under the UN Millennium Development Goal (MDG), the Philippines is supposed to halve poverty from the base of 45.3 percent of households in 1991 to 22.7 percent by 2015. That cannot now be met. This is the admission of the National Statistical Coordination Board (NSCB).

Check the NSCB website. Type “mdg Philippines” and go to NSCB then to “MDG Watch.” Of 39 MDG indicators, 20 cannot be met (low to medium probability), according to NSCB data.

The 20 targets with low to medium probability of being met by 2015 include: national poverty threshold at 22.7 percent (32.9 percent in 2006); prevalence of underweight children under 5 years of age of 17.3 percent (24.6 percent in 2006), percent of households with per capita energy less than 100 percent adequacy of 34.7 percent (56.9 percent in 2003), net enrollment ratio in primary education of 100 percent (83.2 percent in 2006), proportion of pupils starting grade1 who reach grade 6 of 100 percent (73.4 percent in 2006), primary completion rate of 100 percent (71.7 percent in 2006), literacy rate of 15 to 24 years old of 100 percent (96.6 percent in 2003), share of women in wage employment in non-agricultural sector of 50 percent (41.8 percent in 2006), 50 percent of seats held by women in national parliament (17.6 percent in 2004), 100 percent ratio of year-old babies immunized against measles (83.2 percent in 2005), 100 percent of births attended by skilled health personnel (70.4 percent in 2006), zero prevalence of tuberculosis (157.8 in 2003), zero death from TB (33 in 2003), and by 2020, 86.2 percent of squatters must have secure access to housing (it keeps declining or is worsening from 91 percent in 1990 to 81.2 percent in 2000).

Now, why did poverty worsen from 30 percent to 32.9 percent during three years of sustained and robust GDP growth (6.4 percent in 2004, 5.0 percent in 2005 and 5.4 percent in 2006)?

President Arroyo’s explanation is that during those years, the government held back on its spending on pro-poor programs because it wanted to reduce its budget deficit so it could secure higher credit ratings for the country. Higher credit ratings translate into lower interest rates or cheaper cost of capital and of borrowing.

For his part, Neeraj Jain, country director for the Philippines of the Asian Development Bank, thinks high rice prices and high oil prices have something to do with worsening poverty. Families spend 55 percent of their income on food; the very poor (bottom 30 percent) allocate 71 percent on food. ADB studies show every 10 percent increase in rice price results in 660,000 people becoming poor. Every 10 percent increase in fuel price results in 160,000 people becoming poor. In 18 months, rice prices doubled. So did oil.

___

If you are valet-parking your car at EDSA Shangrila, be careful. Get the name (and if possible photograph the face) of the person who parks your car. Last Wednesday night, my SUV suffered a huge dent on its bumper, apparently the result of reckless or incompetent driving.

Adding insult to injury, the parking valet was even claiming the SUV already had the dent when I had it parked, which is a lie. The SUV was earlier washed and I didn’t use it the whole day because it was color-coded. I asked the Shangri-la EDSA management for the names of the parking valets involved. After two days, the hotel was still hemming and hawing. Valet parking is done by a subcontractor, not by the hotel.

biznewsasia@gmail.com

   
 

The PSE-Manila Times Equity Challenge 2008

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: