The Manila Times

Metro

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

 

SC clarifies dual citizenship


MERE reacquisition of one’s Filipino citizenship does not satisfy the constitutional requirement on elective positions, even for the lowly post of barangay captain.

The Supreme Court, in a seven-page en banc resolution penned by Associate Justice Ruben Reyes, upheld the ruling of the Commission on Elections disqualifying Eusebio Eugenio Lopez as village chief of Barangay Bagacay, San Dionisio, Iloilo.

“A Filipino-American or any dual citizen cannot run for any elective public position in the Philippines unless he or she personally swears to a renunciation of all foreign citizenship at the time of filing the certificate of candidacy,” the High Tribunal explained.

Records show that Lopez regained his Filipino citizenship through Republic Act 9225, the Citizenship Retention and Reacquisition Act of 2003, more popularly known as the Dual Citizenship Law. 

He ran and won as barangay chairman in the elections held last October 29, 2007.

On October 25, 2007, respondent Tessie Villanueva filed a petition before the Provincial Election Supervisor of the province of Iloilo, seeking for the disqualification of Lopez on the ground that he is an American citizen, hence, ineligible from running for any public office.

In his answer, Lopez argued that he is a dual citizen and possessed the qualifications to run for barangay chairman.

On February 6, 2008, the Comelec granted the petition for disqualification against Lopez, saying that “he was not able to regain his Filipino citizenship in the manner provided by law.”

The poll body said the petitioner, to be able to qualify as a candidate in the elections, should have made a personal and sworn renunciation of any and all foreign citizenship. 

In his petition for review before the High Tribunal, Lopez cited the case of Vallez v. Comelec. He argued that his filing of a certificate of candidacy operated as an effective renunciation of foreign citizenship.

But the High Tribunal said “the operative facts that led to this Court’s ruling in [the] Valles [case] are substantially different from the present case.”

“In [the] Valles [case], the candidate, Rosalind Ybasco Lopez, was a dual citizen by accident of birth on foreign soil. Lopez was born of Filipino parents in Australia,” the High Tribunal explained.

“In contrast, petitioner was born a Filipino but he deliberately sought American citizenship and renounced his Filipino citizenship. He later on became a dual citizen by reacquiring Filipino citizenship.”

The High Tribunal also stressed that its 2000 ruling in the Valles case has been superceded by the enactment of R.A. No. 9225 in 2003, which expressly provides for the conditions before those who reacquired Filipino citizenship may run for public office in the Philippines.
--William B. Depasupil

   

The PSE-Manila Times Equity Challenge 2008

Manila Times Friends

Phgifts

OFW Gifts

philflora.gif

 
Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Severino O. Frayna Jr., Benjie Dela Rosa
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: