Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Special Report

  Top Stories

  Opinion

  World

  Weekend

  Sports

  Career Times

  Property & 
   Home

 
 
 

Sunday, June 01, 2008

 

NOTE VERBALE
By Jaime N. Soriano

At the threshold of stagflation


In economics, stagflation has been defined as a state or period of a slow moving or moribund economy coupled with high unemployment and rising prices.

They say that the term, which combined stagnation and inflation, was first used by a former British politician and minister, Iain Norman Macleod in a 1965 speech to the parliament. But stagflation, they say, was only acknowledged as a serious macroeconomic condition in the seventies after it had stricken many countries. Before that time, the generally accepted Keynesian economic theories of twentieth century British economist, John Maynard Keynes, assumed that inflation and stagnation are not likely to occur at the same time.

In economics, inflation pertains to the general and progressive increase in prices of goods and services. Inflation is like the cholesterol resident in the human body; it can either be good or bad. 

Economists would say that mild or manageable levels of inflation have beneficial effects because it stimulates economic growth or keep the economy active. In the short-term, it encourages people to spend more now in anticipation of higher prices in the future. Borrowing money is more likely because there are less incentives to save. Expected inflation could drive the conversion of savings to take the form of investments than to see the purchasing power of these savings depreciates with inflation.

Inflation is often associated by experts with the excessive money supply circulating in the economy. And the tasks of handling, controlling and regulating this scenario fall on the lap of governments through central banking and its monetary policies. Thus, it is almost predictable for government to increase interest rates during periods of inflation to moderate money supply.

But unpredictable and high inflation rates are like bad cholesterols that could lead to a cardiac arrest of the economy. The uncertainty discourages people to invest and save. Predictably, workers would demand for higher wages to cope up with the rising prices of goods and services, which in turn lead to higher inflation. The currency may then lose its value and the normal workings of the economy is eventually jeopardized.

Having a declining economy, high unemployment and unmanageable inflation all at the same time in a scenario called stagflation is surely unfortunate.

Many analysts say that the global stagflation in the seventies could be attributed in part to the inflation brought about by the abrupt increase in the price of crude oil. For those old enough to remember, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) met in Tehran in 1973 and doubled the price of oil from US$5.50 to US$11.00 a barrel because, among other reasons, of the desire of the then Shah of Iran for more foreign exchange to acquire more military hardware.

Increases in crude oil prices this year are unprecedented.  In December 2006, per barrel price is about US$63. By October 2007, the price rose to above US$90. In January of this year, it reached the US$100 dollar mark, and last May 21, the price breached the US$130 level only after almost five months. Several days after, the price even went up to more than US$135. Unfortunately, there are forecasts that the price could be as high as US$200 per barrel by the end of 2009. Perhaps, it could be more.

It appears that what drives the escalating prices of oil in the world market to unreasonable proportion is not so much about the economic rationale of supply and demand, although it is often used as the justification.  Political conflicts and greedy speculations are.

While most people of the world would have to brace for higher prices, growing unemployment, economic collapse, and even poverty and hopelessness, a few others would reap the bounty in due course. For obvious reasons, there is nothing much heard of OPEC, an organization which is expected to ensure the stabilization of international oil market prices, even if this issue is the global talk of the town these days. Regrettably, even if the global oil situation improves and normalizes, it is next to impossible to expect that these prices would ever go down below the US$100 level. The more reasonable expectation is for the price to simply stabilize.

Meanwhile and unless oil prices remain stable, many countries in the world are in danger of stagflation. God forbids what would happen after that.

www.soriano-ph.com

   
 

manilablossoms

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Ping Oco, Franklin Bartolay
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: