The Manila Times

Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

 

EAST WEST
By Julius F. Fortuna
Pass the baselines bill


On the plan to pass a baselines law, the stand of Sen. Aquilino Pimentel Jr. is correct. Sen. Miriam Defensor-Santiago is wrong. Congress should pass the law pronto even if it would mean incurring the ire of other countries or the United Nations.

We are considering is a municipal law. It is an assertion of our sovereignty over a territory. In the process of drafting that law, we will consult the experts in international law. We will try to look at the provisions of the United Nations on the Law of the Sea. But we cannot be prevented—or delayed—from passing that law.

Other countries do the same. Example: The National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China has passed a municipal law on its territory which was not based on the Law of the Sea. There was firestorm of protest over that move. But the Chinese were undaunted. Their own map includes the Spratlys and the Scarborough Shoal which is part of Masinloc, Zambales. Did the Chinese consult the UN? No, they did not.

Israel has its own law on national territory. Did it consult the United Nations before publishing its map or occupying the contested areas of the West Bank? Of course not. An Israeli diplomat told me some years back that if a country allows the UN to tie its hands, that’s the end of that country.

We are not suggesting some form of extremism here. We are for the rule of law among nations. But on the matter of making maps, we can go ahead drawing our national territories and announcing the scope of our borders to the world. There is nothing wrong with that. Hindi tayo nag-iisa.

If we wait for the United Nations to approve our proposed map, that would take years. And suppose the United Nations disagree with our opinion and our map? When that happens, we can never have a law on national territory. As of the moment, all we have is the Treaty of Paris which only allows a sea territory of 12 miles from our shores.

Let us assume that we include the Spratlys in a Philippine map. Will China protest? Of course it will! So what? In the relations among nations, protests are natural. We can take note of those protests, but normal relations will remain. After drawing our map, we start discussions with our neighbors and the international community to delineate our borders. That’s how reasonable states behave.

Senator Pimentel is correct in calling for a quick discussion of the baselines bill. Let us not anticipate the moves of the United Nations or China. Let us go ahead with our mandate to draw our own map and let us correct the details later. Having a map ready means that we are prepared to talk with those who disagree with us.

This idea of a commission of experts to study the baselines bill is one way of delaying the bill. The real experts in this country are the members of the legislature who will study the bill and consult the people on what is really our national territory.

In our map, we can include the Kalayaan Islands in our proposed national territory even if the Chinese have claimed the place as their own. We have actual possession of Kalayaan as we have a barangay there. We don’t have to classify Kalayaan as a “regime of islands.” A regime of islands, a proposal by the Department of Foreign Affairs, implies that we are only claiming it. It is already ours.

Bataan nuclear plant

In 1986, just after the EDSA People Power, the majority opinion was that the Bataan nuclear plant should be closed. Today, the government is studying the plan to reopen it.

Two reasons were advanced when the plant was closed during former President Aquino’s time. First, that it was unsafe and second, that it was based on corruption. But the energy problems of today seem to be bigger than those two previous reasons, and so, the review of the policy.

“We intend to revisit this particular option,” said Energy chief Angelo Reyes,” speaking at the Kapihan sa Sulo on Saturday. Reyes complained that the government spent billions of pesos to build the plant. But it failed to generate even a kilowatt of electricity.

We should expect an intense debate on this plan by government. Already, nongovernment organizations have expressed their opposition to the Reyes announcement. But economist Butch Valdez, a staunch advocate of nuclear energy, told me that he is for the opening of the plant. Butch is ready to debate.


BRIEF NOTES. Senate President Manny Villar, speaking to journalists over the weekend, said that the matter of his vice presidential partner is no problem. His political coalition, led by the Nacionalista Party, is set to choose the VP . . . The death through gunshot on Tuesday of Atty. Sunshine Mortel Mallen of Odiongan, Romblon and her husband Benjie Mallen of Romblon, Romblon, is really tragic. My condolences.

julius42na@yahoo.com

   
 

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: