The Manila Times

Top Stories

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

 
 
 

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

 

GEMS OF HISTORY

Chinese in Calamba

By Go Bon Juan

Editor’s note: The Sixth Dr. Jose P. Rizal Awards for Excellence awarding ceremony will be held at 2 p.m., June 14, at the Kaisa-Angelo King Heritage Center on Anda and Cabildo streets, Intramuros, Manila.

CALAMBA, Laguna, is well known as the hometown of national hero Jose Rizal. But there is a less bucolic side to its history.

For the Chinese in the Philippines, Calamba was where the 1639 second massacre of the Chinese in the Philippines started. Thousands of Chinese laborers were conscripted to open up Calamba’s agricultural lands. In the first month alone, hundreds died of malaria. The forced labor and unbearable hardship eventually led them to revolt against the Spanish cabezas there. The revolt then spilled over to neighboring provinces and Manila. In the end, around 24,000 Chinese died from the atrocities and the massacres that followed.

Besides the massacre, it is interesting to note that the Chinese in Calamba also figured in the dispute between the tenants of Calamba and the Dominican estate in the 1880s. Together with other Filipinos, the Chinese signed a document drafted by Rizal to seek government intervention in the conflict. We noticed this incidentally when we read a narrative, written by Rizal himself, entitled “La verdad para todos” (truth for everyone) and published in La Solidaridad on May 31, 1889. The story was mentioned in Leon Ma. Guerrero’s book, The First Filipino.

Let us quote Rizal’s article at length below, so readers have a better grasp of the issue and the context in which Rizal mentioned to the Chinese’ participation.

“The answer to the government’s inquiry, if it were to be truthful, would injure the friars’ interests. The friars wanted it answered in accordance with facts; but, considering that this would be contrary to the truth and to the duty of a good citizen, the writer drafted the reply on the basis of detailed information, translated it into Tagalog, and read it to all [the tenants], including the very emissaries of the friars so that they might report its contents to their masters.

“No one protested and all voluntarily signed, even the very partisans of the friars who could not deny the facts, although the author reminded them that with their signatures they would call upon themselves the reprisals of the power.

“What happened? The document was submitted, it went through all the legal channels . . . and it was pigeonholed! The friars sought revenge and the townspeople submitted another document seeking the intervention of the government since the government itself had started the dispute; but the government remained silent; it said neither yes nor no; there was no investigation and the charges were not looked into; the government was afraid of fighting for the truth and forsook the unfortunate townspeople.

“Yet the petition spoke only of agriculture, of urbanization! It did not impugn the immaculate purity of the friars, it did not expose corruption, because the writer has never wanted to stain his pen with the filth in which certain habits are soaked. It dealt with nothing more than the question of crops, lands, roads, schools, houses, etc.

“This document was signed by all the principales; it was signed by this writer with his full name; it was signed by women, property-owners, Chinese, servants, laborers; it was signed by the whole town. It was read to the whole world, to foes and friends, to the authorities, to the peninsular Spaniards, because we had the courage of our convictions and because we believed in the sincerity of the government and its devotion to the welfare of the country.

“Nothing, nothing was done! And from it all nothing remains but the revenge inflicted on the unfortunate townspeople, victims of their loyalty to the government and for their good faith . . .”

What is interesting and significant here is that it showed that those Chinese in Calamba then might also be tenants of the Dominican estate, and in the struggle between the Calambeños and the Spanish friars, the Chinese also sided with their fellow townsmen. This incident highlighted Rizal’s greatness. He was able to organize such a broad united front among all sectors of Calamba, including the Chinese.

The Calamba incident is another good example that illustrates the fact that in the struggle against Spanish colonial rule, the Chinese always fought side by side with their Filipino brothers.

   

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

 
Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Severino O. Frayna Jr., Benjie Dela Rosa
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: