The Manila Times

Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

 

EDITORIAL

Give Neri his old NEDA job

 
College and university level educators have been urging Malacañang to relieve temporary chairman of the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) Secretary Romulo Neri of his job at the Commission.

We agree. And we offer the President our unsolicited advice that he should be given back his old job at the National Economic Development Authority (NEDA).

Putting Neri in CHED was an obviously politically expedient move. The ZTE NBN deal scandal erupted after he told opposition senators about alleged bribery efforts of former Comelec Chairman Benjamin Abalos and that he had told President Gloria M. Arroyo of these sordid maneuvers. The senators had him as their guest in an executive session during which Neri stopped testifying because he became too ill or to afraid to continue.

Taking him out of NEDA, on whose findings and recommendations Cabinet and presidential decisions about projects like the ZTE NBN hinge, was obviously a Palace ploy to cool Senate and media attention on the scandal.

It did not work. The scandal still grew. Sec. Neri’s trusted consultant on projects, Noel “Jun” Lozada, was made to go to Hong Kong. He returned, was abducted and made to sign affidavits containing false statements. He sought the protective company of nuns and blew the whistle at a dawn press conference. Finally he appeared at Senate hearings where he told all that he knew.

Grim executive privilege

The next thing the Senate wanted was to have Sec. Neri appear at the hearing investigating the ZTE NBN deal. But Neri succeeded in getting a much-maligned Supreme Court decision—from which Chief Justice Reynato Puno and other justices — dissented —giving Neri and other government officials the power to invoke presidential executive privilege so that they do not have to tell the Senate anything about any matter, including criminal acts, they had discussed with the President of the Philippines.

That decision makes a mockery of the principle that the Executive, the Judicial and the Legislative are co-equal and separate institutions that live in a balance of power. Each is given a certain amount of power to check the abuses and crime the officials of the other two branches of government might be guilty of. The High Court’s decision now gives the President and her Cabinet members and other high officials the license to continue engaging in all kinds of criminal acts while enjoying immunity from having to talk about these matters to senators conducting probes.

Now that Neri can invoke executive privilege, the President has no reason to keep him from doing the job he is most qualified for—the NEDA director general.

The President’s announcement that Neri was to be transferred to CHED (which rudely told then CHED Chairman Carlito Puno that he was being fired) contained a good reason for the move. Neri was supposed to have the special talent to solve the problem of the job mismatch between the business and industrial sectors and the college graduates marching out of Philippine colleges and universities. As far as we in the media could ascertain from sources in the CHED, Neri has not done much work to solve this jobs mismatch problem.

Instead, we have witnessed the Philippines Association of Colleges and Universities (PACU) and its 170 members calling for the immediate replacement of Neri because he has “played deaf and blind” to tertiary education concerns.

PACU is the country’s principal association of higher-education institutions. Its president, Gonzalo Duque, is also the deputy chief of the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration, one of whose tasks is to address problems of job mismatching.

Duque said, “Neri’s brilliance is misplaced. He should be placed somewhere else where his brilliance can be put to good use. Apparently, the acting chairman has other things in mind than attending to higher education concerns. In the past, Neri said he would get out of CHED fast and that he had no ambitions of staying there longer. Clearly, his intention is different from what he’s actually doing.”

Humorous Peter Principle

The humorous Peter Principle — “In a hierarchical structure, a person tends to be promoted to his level of incompetence” – has apparently caught up with Neri at the CHED.

Duque says CHED needs a chairman who is “really focused on the job.” On a scale of 10 to 0, he gives Neri’s performance a failing grade of 4.

Other critics of Neri’s performance at CHED have said that the commission is now “in a state of suspended animation” because the chairman is not giving it the direction it needs.

Insiders, as well as visitors from both the private and public sectors, say Neri hardly reports for work.

Members of the Coordinating Council of Private Educational Associations (COCOPEA) lament the state of affairs at CHED. They are disgusted by Neri’s neglect of the commission. They talk about his lack of a doctoral degree which, by law, is among the qualifications a CHED chairman must have. They warn that if Neri doesn’t resign from CHED, the COCOPEA would challenge Neri’s appointment in court.

 Last year, immediately after President Arroyo’s announcement that Neri would be replacing then CHED Chairman Puno, the Philippine Association of State Universities and Colleges (Pasuc) issued a statement asking the President to reconsider her stand. Pasuc warned that Neri, not having the qualifications, experience and standing of a good education manager, would not do a good job. They were prophetic.

President Arroyo will do herself and the nation a good deed if she immediately returns Secretary Neri to NEDA.

   
 

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: