The Manila Times

Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Saturday, June 21, 2008

 

NATURE FOR LIFE
By Anabelle E. Plantilla
Haribon’s stand on
forest management bill

 
Second of seven parts

A new definition of forest should be used. A forest is not composed of just the trees but is an ecosystem. A more accurate definition would be “land consisting of trees with overlapping crown covering of at least 60 percent with a biotic community mainly composed of woody and nonwoody vegetation and the wildlife therein.”

The definition in the Senate and House versions describe a forest as having at least 10 percent cover in an area of at least half a hectare. From an ecological point of view, an area with 90 percent grassland is not a forest but a grassland. The definition of forest should refer to the dominant vegetation of the area. Forests are part of the mountain environment in the watershed continuum. They aid in preventing flooding and soil erosion. Forests also feed the streams that feed the rivers that feed the seas. Nutrients from the forest are eaten and released and eaten again by microorganisms as they spiral downstream. Excess nutrients finally flow out of river mouths to enrich estuaries which in turn release their nutrients into the coastal waters. Forests promote biodiversity not only in the areas where they are found but also in the lowlands and the sea.

The role of forests in mitigating global warming and protecting endemic endangered species of plants and animals in forests should be highlighted. Adding the following statements in the basic policies can do this:

• The State recognizes the importance of the ecological services of tropical rainforests in sustaining life on earth especially in mitigating global warming. Further, tropical rainforests are the most important habitats of endemic and threatened species of plants and animals found nowhere else in the world.

• Forest management must always and sincerely consider biodiversity protection and conservation of wildlife resources and their habitats consistent with Chapter 1, Section 2 of Republic Act. 9147.

A new definition also requires identifying where forest may still be found and mapping them. Currently, this function is being performed by the Department of Environment and Natural resources (DENR). It is suggested that the areas identified by the DENR be verified and validated by the Forest Resource Development Center. The information gathered would be used for the creation of a forestland resource database, which shall consist of comprehensive up-to-date information on the physical, social, economic, biological, environmental and cultural components to ensure more effective management of forests.

It is also necessary to determine the types of forests in the country as these have different characteristics that would warrant diverse methods for managing and conserving them effectively. For example, natural forest refers largely to the tropical rain forest (whether primary, secondary or residual forest) that is not planted by man and which includes the lowland dipterocarp forest at 0 to 1000 meters above sea level (masl), montane at 1000 to 2000 masl, and mossy at 2000 to 3000 masl. It also refers to pine forest in the highlands of Luzon and Mindoro, molave forest in most islands with karst and limestone substrates, beach and mangrove forests in the coastlines.

The current bill provides a mechanism for identifying “permanent forestlands” in addition to the lands already declared as such by the DENR and all unclassified lands of the public domain. It is submitted, however, that the criteria found thereon, such as the 18% slope, is no longer a relevant rule for classification. Taking into consideration the climate, soil topography and existing needs for conservation could provide a better method of determining what lands should be considered permanent forestlands.

At the very least, the enumeration found in the current SFM bill should be expanded to include isolated patches of forest with rocky terrain or which protect a spring for communal use, without need of a minimum area. The SFM bill further classifies permanent forestlands according to their use into protection forests and production forests and provides strategies for managing each kind.

The definition of protection forests has to be expanded to make the law effective. Protection forest should include all natural and restored forests. Where there are persons with existing tenurial instruments in protection forests, such tenurial instruments shall be deemed modified by the SFM Law as cutting and felling of trees shall be completely banned in protection forests. For CADC or CALT in protection forests, customary laws shall apply. This is consistent with the bill’s policy on ICCs/IPs that areas covered by ancestral domains under the Indigenous People’s Rights Act shall be governed by customary law.

To be continued

   
 

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: