Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Special Report

  Top Stories

  Opinion

  World

  Weekend

  Sports

  Career Times

  Property & 
   Home

 
 
 

Sunday, June 22, 2008

 

DURIAN
By Amina Rasul
Living apart, living separately

 
AFTER 9/11 and the hysteria over the “Clash of Civilizations,” interfaith dialogue has become more and more a viable alternative to bridge the chasm of misunderstanding and discrimination between the Muslim communities and the “West.” The Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) on Interfaith Dialogues is one such bridge. The ASEM is an interregional forum which consists of the European Commission and its twenty-seven member countries and the Asean Plus Three. The latter include Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Brunei, Vietnam, Laos, Burma and Cambodia plus the People’s Republic of China, Japan and South Korea. ASEM focuses on three main areas: political dialogue, security and the economy, education and culture. Interfaith dialogues became a major topic after 9/11. Through the ASEM, ways of addressing the conflicts that have created stress in the relationships between Muslim communities and European states have been discussed.

The 4th ASEM on Interfaith Dialogues was held in Amsterdam (June 4-5). Prior to the ASEM, the Asia-Europe Foundation (ASEF) together with the European Journalism Center (EJC) held the 6th ASEF Journalists’ Colloquium. The two-day Colloquium (June 1 and 2) had 14 editors and journalists from Asia and Europe debate on the subjects of freedom of expression, media’s role in conflict resolutions and interfaith dialogue especially in the globalized digital world. Definitely media have a significant role but do media have responsibility to prevent conflict and facilitate understanding among faiths and cultures?

We listened to Job Cohen, Mayor of Amsterdam, share his experience in managing the city’s diverse communities. In 20 years, half of the city’s population will be ethnic minorities. Amsterdam has been reeling from confrontations between its fast-growing Muslim community and the Christian majority. In 2004, Dutch filmmaker Theo Van Gogh was shot and stabbed to death in Amsterdam after receiving death threats over a movie he had made which criticized how women were treated in Islam. Last year, Dutch lawmaker Geert Wilder produced Fitna, a short film which portrayed Islam as a violent religion. While Fitna has triggered anger in the Muslim world, the reactions have been muted in comparison to the Danish cartoons.

Mr. Cohen spoke of Amsterdam as a city of minorities, where no one culture or faith is dominant. While he sees himself as a pragmatic politician without religious affiliation, he has accepted that “religion is a significant factor in the politics of our times.” He spoke of each community living in peace, separate but together. He spoke of providing space for each community to be different from each other.

How do we provide safe spaces which will intersect on common grounds of peace and justice for all? During the Colloquium, we acknowledged that the media have a tremendous role to play, either to divide or unite communities. We had debates on the impacts of net-based media on shaping the opinion of the communities. Some believe that there must be regulations to prevent abuse of the net. After all, if journalists and traditional media practitioners have to abide by a code of ethics and are subject to libel laws, why is the net free from any regulation? The Colloquium wrestled with the need to protect freedom of the press and the right of individuals to free expression while acknowledging media’s responsibility in the prevention of conflicts caused by different faiths. Ambassador Wonil Cho, the indefatigable ASEF Executive Director, spoke of providing the appropriate “balance.”

The Colloqium concluded with 14 recommendations on how media could contribute to interfaith dialogue, which were accepted by the ASEM workshop on media. I am extremely happy to report that our Moro Times, a monthly supplement of The Manila Times, was cited as a model which can be replicated. Recommendation three states: “For print media to make supplements to newspapers about minorities or smaller religious groups on a regular basis. Taking example from the existing supplements, such as Moro Times (monthly supplement to The Manila Times), it may be just four-page extra published every month or can be of any frequency. Newspapers can do this in collaboration with the minority groups. The groups can initiate the process by contacting newspapers themselves with suggestions or even deliver the supplements as advertisement supplements.”

Our diverse communities can no longer live in isolation. Globalization forces us to deal with increased interaction among different cultures and faiths. The information highways of the 21st century connect us in the blink of an eye. We can either use them to link our communities towards common ground or irresponsibly use modern technology to inflame conflicts over differences.

aminarasul@yahoo.com

   
 

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: