Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Special Report

  Top Stories

  Opinion

  World

  Weekend

  Sports

  Career Times

  Property & 
   Home

 
 
 

Sunday, June 29, 2008

 

SUNDAY STORIES
By Marlen V. Ronquillo
Toothless inquiries and crap insurance

 
From time immemorial, the Board of Marine Inquiry (BMI), Philippine-version, has been identified with two things. It is either a fangless tiger or a board that almost always tilts to the side of a negligent shipowner.

Nothing on the voluminous archives of the BMI inquiries reveal sympathy and empathy for the victims of sea tragedies. The anti-victim tilt is understandable. It is the scum of the earth, the poor, the wretched that board the overloaded floating coffins. They can perish at sea and no one—after the initial media hysteria—will mourn their passing.

The owners of the shipping lines are rich, powerful, politically connected. They have lawyers and political sponsors, if they are not big political families themselves. The past and present names of Philippine shipping giants, including the responsible ones, are a collection of Philippine society’s Who’s Who: Aboitiz, Escano, Madrigal, Chiongbian, Go, Ledesma, etc.

Manny Pangilinan of PLDT tried to gain a foothold into shipping by acquiring the bankrupt Negros Navigation from the family of Rep. Jules Ledesma. The venture is barely afloat. Part of the huge Madrigal wealth that Jamby, the senator, is contesting, has its origins in shipping.

The inquiries and recommendations of BMIs, past and present, have a pattern. Ship tragedies, even those that kill passengers by the thousands, are always “ acts of nature.”

Shipowners and operators, if they are cited at all, are mostly given a slap on the wrists.

It is the shameless and almost criminal pandering of past and present BMIs to the interest of shipowners and operators that provides the ideal environment for the creation of special admiralty courts. These are the courts that try maritime cases.

England and the other First World countries with long maritime traditions have these courts. Maritime justice is rendered fairly and swiftly. In England, the courts always tend to rule in favor of the victims, not the shipowners and operators, even if this means a hemorrhage at the Lloyd’s of London, which insures the ships, cargo and passengers.

If there is an ideal time and context to create Philippine admiralty courts, it is now.

It is not only in maritime tragedies that the response of the state is weak, anemic or inconsequential. Typhoon Frank exposed the obvious: the state-sponsored crop insurance program is almost nonexistent.

Ka Nellie Chavez, the representative of our peasant group, said she will start looking into the operations, programs and funding of the Philippine Crop Insurance Corp. (PCIC). Her first question will be this: How much of the P5-billion damage Typhoon Frank inflicted on crops, poultry and livestock is covered by PCIC insurance?

Is PCIC into the serious business of insuring crops, poultry and livestock? Or, is the insurance work a lot of phantom transactions and crap? Is the PCIC backed by real funding? Or, has it run out of funds? Ka Nellie said these questions have to be answered.

The PCIC used to be very active during the Marcos years. Backed by a solid financial muscle, it insured crops, poultry and livestock on a massive scale. After calamities, farmers that deserved crop insurance got crop insurance. There was not much quibbling and temporizing on the payment of the claims.

The current low-profile operation of the PCIC, this is the general suspicion of the peasantry, has nothing to do with a sincere effort to just do its work outside of the media limelight. It is because it has nothing to report. Coverage of crops, poultry and livestock is marginal.

I even suspect that the PCIC has ran out of funds. The grapevine says it has only P200 million in capital.

Ka Nellie hopes that her inquiries into the operations of the PCIC will lead to policy reforms. The PCIC is a very important GOCC (government-owned and -controlled corporation), perhaps as important as the National Food Authority. Its mandate is important and sensitive.

Ka Nellie should also probe deeper into the leadership of the PCIC. Is the leadership anemic and clueless? A vigorous and inspired leadership at the PCIC would not have allowed the deterioration of the agency into its present state.

Typhoon Frank and its raw, ruthless fury have unmasked terrible holes and voids in the state bureaucracy. We should have admiralty courts instead of the toothless BMIs. We should have a crop insurance program with funding and massive coverage. Not a PCIC, which work is a lot of crap.

mvrong@yahoo.com

   
 

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: