The Manila Times

Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Wednesday, March 05, 2008

 

BIG DEAL
By Dan Mariano
Blind to other oligarchs

 
It is remarkable that little, if any, has been remarked about the testimony of columnist Angelito Banayo before the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee last month. Banayo was summoned to recount the details of the “secret meeting” he, Jun Lozada, Senators Ping Lacson and Jamby Madrigal had with Romulo Neri last December.

Reproducing a diagram Neri handed out at the meeting, Banayo tried to recall the ex-NEDA chief’s explanation of how the “political economy” has come under the “regulatory capture” of “the national oligarchy.”

Banayo’s comprehensive recollection hinted at a sharp memory, but his senatorial interrogators failed to mine it for the gems it obviously contained. In fact—as Banayo recalled—what Neri laid out was a critique of Philippine society, outlining the dynamics of the wealth and power that are concentrated in a tiny clique.

What perked the senators’ interest was the mention of such names as “Ricky Razon” and “Tomas Alcantara,” who were portrayed as exerting much influence on the Arroyo administration.

Reference was also made to other big businessmen—most­ly ethnic Chinese—but for some reason the senators decided not to delve any further on those magnates.

Taipan minefield

Why Lacson et al. feared to tread on the taipan minefield, observers could only speculate. Unfortunately, just when the Blue-Ribbon inquiry seemed to have finally hit upon the underlying causes of corruption, the senators suddenly turned gun shy.

The terms Neri—as recounted by Banayo—used to describe his assessment of the state of the nation probably sounded too scholarly for the senators’ intellectual threshold and, more important, political purposes. Yet, these academic concepts and constructs are precisely what can help us understand what the heck is really wrong with this country.

For instance, “political eco­nomy” is used to analyze the ways individuals and groups with common economic interests have used politics to effect changes beneficial to their interests. It refers to various, but related, approaches to studying economic and political beha­viors, ranging from combining economics with other fields, to using different, fundamental assumptions that challenge orthodox economic assumptions.

“Regulatory capture” refers to the phenomenon where government regulatory agencies, supposedly operating in the public interest, become dominated by the vested interests of the industries they theoretically oversee. Vested interests have a stake in the outcomes of political decisions. Regulatory capture thus ensures that they will find means—direct or indirect—to hold decision-makers captive.

“Oligarchy” is a form of government where political power belongs to a tiny elite, distinguished by wealth, family or military power. Power is not exercised openly as oligarchs prefer to remain “the power behind the throne,” exerting control through economic means.

The senators’ reluctance to dig deep into the root causes of corruption—according to Neri, as recounted by Banayo—is a disturbing signal.

They have readily accommodated derogatory information on the President and her underlings to press their case for her removal. However, their apparent aversion for a thorough analysis of the underlying causes of corruption hints loudly of their real motive—as well as the real likelihood that the problem will remain even if GMA were somehow ousted.

Of course, lifting Executive Order 464 should allow Neri himself to expound further on the political economy, regulatory capture and oligarchy.

DENR cited

Secretary Lito Atienza of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources has been dragged into the NBN-ZTE scandal after he was “set up,” as he put it, by Jun Lozada.

Away from the Senate inquisition, however, Atienza has been reaping good reviews. Recently, the World Bank cited his department as the most transparent and accountable government agency in the procurement of goods and services.

Although the WB citation has been largely unpublicized, Atienza vowed to continue reforms that would eliminate graft and corruption in the DENR.

The World Bank gave the DENR its high rating after noting the following: the quality of notices published and associated documents; registration of all suppliers and bidders; on-line downloading of bid documents; identification of participating bidders; posting of contract awards; and the average period of posting awards notices from closing date.

Atienza said while he had made a good start at the central office, the more challenging part involves mainstreaming reforms to all DENR bureaus and field offices. He urged the private sector and civil society groups to help the government push reforms in the procurement process.

“The DENR will not let go of what it has started and will ensure that adequate resources are provided in implementing the law,” said Atienza, referring to Republic Act 9184, the Philippine Procurement Law, signed into law by Mrs. Arroyo in January 2003.

   
 

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: