The Manila Times

Top Stories

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

 
 
 

Friday, March 07, 2008

 

Graft, politics, poor tax collection 
make poverty worse–ADB

By Darwin G. Amojelar Reporter

The Asian Development Bank (ADB) on Thursday said rampant corruption, political instability and poor revenue collections are the main culprits in the country’s worsening poverty incidence.

In the report, Philippines: Critical Development Constraints, the Manila-based lender said the pace of poverty reduction has been slow, and income inequality remains stubbornly high in the country.

Data released by the government showed that 26.9 percent of families in 2006 were below the official poverty threshold, up from 24.4 percent in 2003. In 2006, the Gini coefficient of per capita income, a key measure of income inequality, was slightly above 0.45—the highest among Southeast Asian economies.

The ADB said the economy has fallen behind its neighbors in East and Southeast Asia over the past five decades.

“While growth has picked up in recent years, with the economy in 2007 posting its highest growth of 7.3 percent in the last three decades, both public and private investments remain sluggish and their share in gross domestic product has continued to decline, raising the question of whether the current economic momentum can be sustained,” the ADB said.

For growth to make an impact on poverty, the ADB said the economy must create productive employment opportunities that benefit and reach all sections of society.

“The government can support its development agenda through broadening access to education, training and health services, instituting more effective and better-funded development programs at local levels, and improving targeted social protection and disaster relief,” the lender said.

Ifzal Ali, ADB chief economist, said, “Targeting and removal of the most critical constraints will lead to the highest returns for the country. It will spur investment, which in turn will lead to sustained and high growth and create more productive employment opportunities.”

Removing constraints “would ensure that the fruits of development are shared by all,” Ali added.

The ADB identified a number of critical constraints to economic growth and the fight against poverty in the next five to eight years for the Philippines.

Firstly, poor performance on key governance aspects, such as in the control of corruption and political stability, has eroded investor confidence. The report cites studies suggesting that the Philippines’ ranking in the control of corruption and maintaining political stability have worsened.

“Governance concerns underline other critical constraints,” the ADB said. “For instance, corruption undermines tax collection, reduced resources for and quality of infrastructure development. Similarly, the political instability hinders investment and growth and reduces the tax base.”

Secondly, the fiscal situation remains tight even while the government made good progress to reduce deficits and aims to balance its budget in 2008.

“Much of the reduction in fiscal deficit has been driven by deep cuts in spending on social and economic services and sale of government assets,” the ADB said.

Thirdly, declining public and private sector investments in infrastructure have led to inadequate and poor infrastructure and bottlenecks. These have raised the cost of doing business and eroded the competitiveness and attractiveness of the country to both foreign and local investors, the lender explained.

Latest available data shows that per capita electricity consumption in the Philippines is roughly one-third that of Thailand and one-fifth that of Malaysia. Similarly, the Philippine ratio of paved road length per capita is roughly one-sixth that of Thailand and one fourth of Malaysia.

Poor infrastructure and weak investor confidence have led to weak flows of foreign direct investment. From 2002 to 2006, investment flows amounted to about $1.1 billion, compared with $6.1 billion for Thailand and $3.9 billion for Malaysia.

The lower investment partly explains the Philippines’ smaller and narrower industrial base, compared to its neighbors. In 2005, the share of manufacturing in GDP was about 23.5 percent, compared with 34.8 percent in Thailand and 30.6 percent in Malaysia.

   

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

 
Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Severino O. Frayna Jr., Benjie Dela Rosa
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: