The Manila Times

Business

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

 

Monday, March 10, 2008

 

SPECIAL REPORT

Spratlys controversy may imperil
Philippine quest for oil self-reliance

By Euan Paulo C. Ańonuevo, Reporter

A POLITICAL witch hunt for graft-tainted deals involving China in the wake of the botched National Broadband Network contract risks complicating the Philippines’ quest for oil self-reliance.

President Arroyo’s critics have trained their sights on the Joint Marine Seismic Undertaking (JMSU), an agreement forged among the Philippines, China and Vietnam in 2005 to transform the contested Spratly  Islands into an area of cooperation and development.

Parties to the agreement, which will end this year, are state-run firms Philippine National Oil Co. (PNOC), China National Offshore Oil Corp. (CNOOC), and Petro Vietnam. The accord, which involves data gathering in the contested area, entails no exploration, drilling and production activities.

Vincent Perez, who as Mrs. Arroyo’s then energy secretary, oversaw negotiations for the accord, said the justice department among other agencies went over the tripartite agreement before the Philippines signed it.

The President’s critics however claim the deal compromises national sovereignty.

The JSMU forms part of the Philippines’ five-point energy independence agenda to find and develop new indigenous petroleum reserves in response to a surge in oil prices in 2004, according to Perez, whom the President recently tapped to advise the government on energy matters.

JSMU has become a potential flashpoint

To be sure, the JSMU, also designed as a compromise to avert hostilities in contested territory, in turn has become a potential flashpoint with a private-investor group.

Since May last year, UK-listed Forum Energy Plc. has sought approval of its application to upgrade its oil exploration contract into a full service contract, to no avail. The company is one of a growing number of foreign groups that have participated in the Philippine Energy Contracting Round (PECR), a mechanism whereby the government bids out areas with potential fuel reserves for exploration and possible drilling and production.

Forum Energy’s Geophysical Survey and Exploration Contract (GSEC) No. 101 covers the Sampaguita oil and gas block in the Reed Bank basin, a potentially world-class gas discovery off the Palawan coast. The company’s contract with the government includes a pre-negotiated option to convert it into a full-production area.

Conversion requires Malacańang approval as the law stipulates that foreign investments in the upstream oil and gas industry have to seek the government’s imprimatur. The Arroyo administration however has yet to decide on Forum Energy’s application, as CNOOC petitioned the inclusion of the area covered by GSEC 101 in the tripartite deal.

“We are still waiting for Department of Energy approval under Philippine petroleum laws,” Jose Raymund L. Apostol, Forum Energy Philippines Corp. president, said.
As it is, Forum Energy’s venture is only one of many that have yet to move forward given delays in the government’s energy independence program. After the JSMU was signed, the government stopped issuing service contracts even to parties that already won bids at successive contracting rounds.

Delays undermining oil, gas prospects

Industry sources said that delays in the awarding of petroleum service contracts are seriously undermining the prospects of the country’s upstream oil and gas industry.

In the first PECR in 2005, the energy department signed petroleum service contracts for oil and gas exploration in offshore Sulu Sea with Australia ‘s BHP Billiton Petroleum Pty Ltd., Amerada Hess Ltd., Unocal Sulu Ltd. and Sandakan Oil II.

In the second contracting round held in the same year, the government signed service contracts with Nido, Philippine National Oil Co.-Exploration Corp., Burgundy Global Exploration Corp., Ranhill Berhad and Phil-Mal Petroenergy Corp. in shallow to deep waters within onshore Palawan and the Sulu Sea basins.

The third contracting round held in 2006 saw nine petroleum areas offered, but no one among the participating companies was awarded a contract.

A fourth contracting round scheduled for late December last year was delayed after the energy department asked for more time to “study” the proposals and bids.

When The Manila Times asked him about the status of the most recent contracting round, Energy Secretary Angelo T. Reyes said, “the government has recently received a number of proposals for exploration and development projects in the local upstream industry,” but provided no detail.

In a subsequent statement, the energy department said it has endorsed seven proposals for various offshore and onshore projects in the country culled from the 2006 contracting round. Total investments from these companies’ proposals is expected to run to about $75 million, which includes costs for various comprehensive geological and geophysical work required before drilling takes place, as well as the cost of drilling and the setting up of exploration wells.
The prospective oil and gas exploration projects and their proponents include Miocene Mining and Energy Corp. for the Cagayan Block (Area 1), Polyard Petroleum International Co. Ltd. for the Central Luzon Basin (Area 2), Pitkin Petroleum Ltd. for the Mindoro-Cuyo Basin Block 2 (Area 4), Burgundy for East Palawan Blocks 1 and 2 (Areas 5 and 6), Norasian Energy Ltd. for the Visayan Basin (Area 8), and Helios Petroleum and Gas Corp. for the Agusan-Davao Basin (Area 9).

Contracts important at soonest possible time

Eduardo F. Hernandez, Petroleum Association of the Philippines president, raised concerns over the “slow pace of processing and approval of exploration contract applications and farm in agreements” especially for foreign companies.

“Now that the price of crude is at an all-time-high and there is a serious interest from both local and foreign players, it is important for the government to enter into [service contracts] at the soonest possible time,” he said during the recent Philippine Energy Summit.

The industry official urged setting a timetable for contract awards, allowing the Executive Secretary to approve foreign investments, and declaring petroleum a strategic commodity to expedite permits, among others.

So what’s at stake? In less than four years, the number of participants in the country’s oil and gas exploration sector grew by about three-folds with the entry of 30 new companies.

Among the companies scouring the Philippines for oil and gas are Chevron Corp., the Shell Group, Vitol Group and ExxonMobil Corp., Petronas, Japan Petroleum Exploration Corp., Kuwait Petroleum Corp., and CNOOC.

Estimates point to approximately 18,600 square kilometers of two-dimensional seismic data was acquired last year from just 11,300 square kilometers in 2006. On top of that are 4,097 square kilometers of three-dimensional seismic data from just 640 square km in the previous year.

One potential source ready to pump oil by this year is the Galoc Oil Field. Located in offshore Northwest Palawan, the field was discovered in 1981 but was deemed commercially unviable because of the low price of crude back then.

Now operated by the Galoc Production Co., the field is expected to churn out oil by the first- quarter of the year and to double the country’s 23,000 barrels of oil per day of production, which is equivalent to only about 7 percent of Philippine demand.

Other discovered oil resources being actively considered for development include Calauit under Service Contract No. 50, Nido 1X1 straddling the area covered by Service Contract Nos. 14 and 54, Octon under Service Contract No. 6A, and West Linapacan under Service Contract No. 14C.

Dave Whitby, Nido Petroleum Ltd. managing director, called this a “renaissance” in the country’s upstream industry brought about by a Supreme Court ruling in 2004 that allowed full foreign ownership in the mining sector.

“Government support is vital for us because the issue of land tenure had stymied the entry of foreign investors and questioned the constitutionality of service contracts,” he said.

In the past two decades less than 20 wells were drilled in the country. In contrast, wells drilled in Indonesia numbered over 1,000, in Malaysia about 900, and in Vietnam around 150.

Industry sources said the increasing acreage being surveyed by local and foreign companies would help spur drilling activities and in turn the possibility of finding black gold in the Philippines. With worldwide drilling odds put at 16 to 1, the country would have to surpass its measly output of less than 20 wells to make this possibility a reality.

The government is banking on the entry of more investors to spur petroleum exploration and development activities as the country imports almost all of its oil requirements for transport fuel and part of its power needs, thus making it susceptible to skyrocketing crude prices.

The controversy over the JSMU therefore further complicates an already difficult situation. The timing of the uproar is also way off the mark, as oil-importing countries all over the world have accelerated their respective search for alternative sources of fuel in the face of skyrocketing prices of crude.

Industry sources said dragging the JSMU into a protracted campaign to unseat Mrs. Arroyo would do little to improve the country’s chances of overcoming this recent bout of record oil prices.

  
 

Manila Times Friends

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

Severino O. Frayna Jr., Benjie Dela Rosa
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin

 

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

  Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: