The Manila Times

Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

 

POLICY PEEK
By Ernesto F. Herrera
Art Brion is more than qualified for SC

 
LAST week, Arturo Brion was appointed associate justice of the Supreme Court, taking over the slot left vacant by Associate Justice Angelina Sandoval Gutier­rez who retired from the SC last 27 February. Brion is the 12th Supreme Court justice appointed by Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, and some quarters have insinuated that the appointment was made in anticipation of a favorable vote on the petition filed by Commission on Higher Education chairman Romulo Neri against a Senate order for his arrest.

Neri, if you recall, has refused to make a second appearance before the Senate hearing on the NBN-ZTE broadband deal, saying he has already said what he can say and invoking executive privilege on the things he claims he cannot testify on, things which deal with the conversations he had with the President. 

If you believe certain reports in the news, the previous 14-man composition of the SC was evenly divided on the Neri petition, and Brion could tilt the balance should he decide either in favor or against.

As far as qualifications for the Supreme Court post are concerned, however, I believe Brion is beyond reproach. He has been nominated twice before to the SC and was a senior member of the 15th Division of the Court of Appeals from June 2003 to June 2006.

He topped the Bar examinations of 1974 with a grade of 91.65% after earning his law degree at the Ateneo University. He graduated cum laude, was the class valedictorian and the recipient of the Ateneo’s Gold Medal for Academic Excellence.

He first practiced law at the Siguion Reyna, Montecillo and Ongsiako Law Office before he was recruited into public service by Blas F. Ople in 1975. Ka Blas was then the labor minister and he got Brion to work as executive director of the Institute of Labor and Manpower Studies, the research, training and policy formulation arm of the labor ministry.

Brion also practiced law in Canada, and even worked as solicitor at the Legal Services Branch of the Ontario Ministry of Labour and at the Ontario Management Board Secretariat.

He had a short stint in the Philippine legislature, having been elected as assemblyman in 1984.

Brion taught law at the Ateneo University College of Law and at the Far Eastern University Institute of Law.

His qualifications alone will not guarantee that Brion’s conduct in the High Court will be defined by independence, integrity and impartiality. But nothing really can, when you think about it. There are no absolute guarantees. His record though is rather unblemished and even the honorable senators did not question this.

As Sen. Mar Roxas told ABS-CBN, Brion’s appointment is well-deserved. “He has a clean record of public service and is well-respected in legal circles. Given Justice Brion’s unblemished record in public service, I am hopeful that he will fulfill his new mandate competently, fairly and with absolute fidelity to the Constitution. He should be given the opportunity to prove himself true to his oath.”

I agree. And I can tell you this: I have known Brion for quite some time now. And he is not a man who will allow himself to be used as an instrument for the arbitrary exercise of power. In his practice of the law, I have not seen the man succumb to improper influence or bias, and he has certainly never been incompetent or inefficient. On the contrary he has shown a high level of competence, integrity and capacity for impartiality.

Sure, he was appointed by GMA and he served in her Cabinet, but so what? It happens that in our system, the executive is the ultimate source of power, whether it concerns the appointment of judges, or the administration of mechanisms for discipline or removal of judges.

But whether Brion was specifically selected by GMA on the basis of how he will likely decide on the Neri case, rather on the basis of expertise and merit, is another matter.

Knowing Brion, he will most likely disappoint the authorities who appointed him with this in mind. Throughout his career as magistrate, he has consistently seen to it that the laws of the land are administered fairly, rationally and impartially.

Give the guy a chance at the SC. I am confident he will prove me right.

ernestboyherrera@yahoo.com

   
 

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: