The Manila Times

Business

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

 

Friday, May 16, 2008

 

RP climbs in global competitiveness 
list, but lags behind peers

By Darwin G. Amojelar  Reporter

THE Philippines ranked higher in terms of global competitiveness this year, but still lagged behind its Asian peers, according to the latest World Competitiveness Yearbook

In its 2008 Yearbook, the Switzerland-based Institute of Management Development (IMD) said the Philippines ranked 40th, or up five notches from last year, with a score of 50.478 among 55 countries.

IMD ranked 55 economies from the most competitive to the least competitive, with scores from 0 to 100 based on 331 criteria measuring different facets of competitiveness.

The criteria include economic performance, government efficiency, business efficiency and infrastructure.

Despite the improvement in its ranking, the Philippines lagged behind Malaysia, which placed 19th; Thailand, 27th; and Korea, 31st. Indonesia however fell behind at 51st.

The US remained on top, followed by Singapore, Hong Kong, Switzerland, Luxemburg, Denmark, Australia, Canada, Sweden and the Netherlands.

Suzanne Rosselet-McCauley, IMD deputy director, said this could be the last time that the US would be in the first place as Singapore might boot it out.

With the US scoring 100, Singapore is in second place with 99.3.

“This year may be the turning point where the US falls from its leadership of top competitors in the world economy,” IMD said.

The organization said this could be a re-make of the Japanese tragedy. Japan had topped the list in the 1990s, but has since fallen to the 22nd spot this year.

“The past crisis in Japan bears some resemblance with the present turmoil in the US. It followed a period of economic boom, real estate price follies and exuberant assets expansion,” IMD said.

“In addition, the liberalization of financial instruments took place without the appropriate regulatory environment; corporate governance was inadequate with little accountability and transparency; and the government was quickly overwhelmed by the magnitude of the crisis,” it added.

The crisis in Japan spread from the stock market to real estate, then developed into a credit crunch before turning into a major crisis of the financial system, IMD said.

However, the differences between the world’s two largest economies are quite large, it added.

  
 

Manila Times Friends

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

Severino O. Frayna Jr., Benjie Dela Rosa
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin

 

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

  Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: