Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Special Report

  Top Stories

  Opinion

  World

  Weekend

  Sports

  Career Times

  Property & 
   Home

 OFW Times

 
 
 

Sunday, May 18, 2008

 

IOM launches study on OFW
remittances, migration and devt

By Nora O. Gamolo, OFW Times Editor

The International Organization for Migration (IOM) recently launched a P55- million project on remittance corridors in the Philippines and Indonesia. Remittances have become one of the largest sources of capital flows to developing economies in the world, like in these two Asean countries.

The project is aimed at improving research and inter-regional information exchange on remittance corridors and national development in Southeast Asia and Europe. It will use three methods to establish remittance trends: research on remittance corridors; policy dialogues; and pilot projects.

IOM is an intergovernmental humanitarian agency committed to the principle of humane and orderly migration in the world, and works closely with governmental, intergovernmental and non-governmental partners. In the past, it had helped repatriate OFWs trapped in Lebanon during the bombings it sustained from Israel in 2006.

The European Commission, through its AENEAS program, is funding IOM’s remittance project that seeks to identify the linkages between migrant workers’ remittances and development.

Set for 18 months, the research will map remittance corridors for the Philippines from Italy, where 128,080 Filipino migrants stay. The research will primarily be undertaken by the non-government group Economic Resource Center for Overseas Filipinos (ERCOF).

The research will also include remittances to Indonesia from the Netherlands, and informal remittance flows from Malaysia to the Philippines and Indonesia. Many Filipino and Indonesian expatriates also work in Malaysia, one of the preferred destinations in Asean for migrant workers in the region.

“There is a vision shift in migration today, and that shift involves the linkage between migration and development,” IOM Regional Representative Charles Harns said during the project launching.

Based on 2007 data from the Remittances Fact Book of the World Bank, the Philippines is the fourth- largest recipient of migrant workers’ remittances in the world, with $17 billion entering the country this year. The country’s top sources of remittances are the United States, Italy, Japan and Saudi Arabia.

Remittances came from permanent, temporary and undocumented Filipino workers, whose number reached 8.2 million in 2007. Filipino migrants can be found in 193 countries.

OFW remittances account for 10 percent of the gross domestic product, said Luzviminda Padilla, Labor undersecretary for employment and manpower development, and their impact is felt mainly at the micro level or in the growth of family income.

Ildefonso Bagasao, ERCOF head, said remittances reduced the level of poverty among migrant families and had multiplier effects on the economies of developing countries, but these benefits are only “asymmetrical” since there is continued increase in poverty in the Philippines.

Basing its data from the 2006 Family Income and Expenditure Survey, the National Statistical Coordination Board said in March that poverty incidence rate rose to 26.9 percent in 2006 from 24.4 percent in 2003, with an additional base of three million poorer Filipinos.

Without OFW remittances, however, the Philippines would have more than 26.5 million poor, rather than the lower figure posted in 2006, 24 million. Regions with significant number of migrants have fewer poor households due to remittances.

At a regional level, a 2007 study by University of the Philippines economist Ernesto Pernia showed that while remittances pad regional income, this financial growth exacerbates inequality among regions, and between individuals, families and communities who enjoy or who do not receive the blessings of remittances.

Anchoring national development on remittances is a “challenge” since the bulk of the remittances received by Filipino families goes to consumption, and rather than saved for future needs. They also do not get redirected to entrepreneurial investments, said Padilla.

She added, “If there is a remittance surplus, that is only when savings are considered,” stressing that the Department of Labor and Employment hopes to draft a program to educate and guide migrant families on how best to use the remittances they have received and facilitate the reintegration of OFWs in the national economy.

The IOM research will also look at concerns like the high placement fees, expensive transfer costs, differences in regulatory approaches and ways of strengthening financial literacy of OFWs and their families, said researcher Bagasao.

Consistent with government policy and directives, the use of formal remittance schemes such as banks, remittance centers and technological remittance vehicles such as mobile cash will be encouraged to lessen instances of remittance wastage and money laundering, said Padilla.

She added that the transfer of remittances through formal channels also enhances their multiplier effects since other sectors also make use of financial resources that enter these financial intermediaries, and OFW remittances benefit all who use the system, such as those who borrow from banks.

   
 

manilablossoms

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Ping Oco, Franklin Bartolay
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: