The Manila Times

Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Saturday, May 24, 2008

 

LAW AND PHILOSOPHY MATTER(S)
By Atty. Emmanuel Q. Fernando
The corruption of Christ’s
scriptural message

 
In my article entitled “The Scriptural Solution to Political Corruption” (April 5, 2008), I argued that the Catholic Bishop’s Conference of the Philippines’ (CBCP) pastoral message deviated from the requirements of the Scriptures with regard to the Church’s earthly mission. I will substantiate this point in this article by elucidating what Christ envisioned as the role of his disciples, and therefore of the Church, in earthly matters.

Christ’s indifference to political affairs was already clearly manifested prior to Holy Week, when he (i.) refused, in the desert, the devil his temptation of wealth and power, (ii.) spoke of the kingdom of heaven and not of earth, (iii.) extolled heavenly, as distinguished from worldly, treasure and riches; and (iv.) refrained from using his omnipotent power to save his cousin, John the Baptist, from an unjust beheading.

During Holy Week, he consistently refused to interject a political dimension to his divine mission of salvation, despite ample opportunity to do so.

At the temple, the Pharisees asked him the trick question: “What thinkest thou? Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar, or not?” (Matthew 22.17). Perceiving their wickedness, Jesus asked them the tribute coin where Caesar’s image was embossed, and, upon receiving it, he cleverly replied: “Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and unto God things that are God’s” (Matthew 22.21).

Later that week, he would be subjected to an ignominious and humiliating criminal process of an unjust trial, which he willingly abided by. He did not refuse arrest by the Pharisees at the Garden of Olives. Thereafter he was mocked, spat at, whipped, scourged, crowned with thorns, humiliated, and abased.

He was first brought to the High Priest Caiaphas, who, expectedly, pronounced him guilty of blasphemy. Since the law of Moses forbade the penalty of death, Caiaphas delivered Jesus to the Roman governor, Pontius Pilate, for the proper punishment.

Pilate, upon learning that Jesus was a Galilean, sent him to King Herod, who in turn was unable to find him guilty of any crime. It did not prevent Herod from subjecting Jesus to further mockery and humiliation. Returned to Pilate who assiduously interrogated him, Jesus continually emphasized that, even though he was a king, his kingdom was not a worldly one.

Pilate asked Jesus: “Art thou the king of the Jews?” Jesus answered: “My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would not my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews?” (John 18.34).

Pilate continued: “Art thou a king then?” Jesus answered: “Thou sayest that I am a king. To this end was I born, and for this cause came I into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth.” (John 18.36)

The injustice went on. Finding Jesus blameless, Pilate brought the issue before the Jewish rabble, who were thronged outside his palace. Given the choice of freeing Barabbas, a rebel who murdered during a rebellion against Rome, or Jesus, the Jews chose to set Barabbas free and to have Jesus crucified.

Even during his crucifixion, he was mocked and pilloried. Upon his cross was written the words: “KING OF THE JEWS.” Some onlookers wagged their heads, saying: “Thou that destroyest the temple and buildeth it in three days, save thyself. If thou be the Son of God, come down from the cross.” (Matthew 27.40).

The chief priests, with the scribes and elders, followed suit: “He saved others; himself he cannot save. If he be the king of Israel, let him now come down from the cross, and we will believe him.” (Matthew 27.41-42).

Jesus endured all these afflictions and humiliations, and consistently refused the expedient worldly solution, lest it deviate from his pure spiritual message of salvation. He came to earth so as to prepare mankind for paradise in heaven and not to create a paradise on earth.

That being so, were his message of salvation heeded and the consequent spiritual reform effected, the foundations for a utopia or a paradise on earth would have been laid. For Christ’s message of salvation consisted in humanity emulating his inward and outward spiritual virtues, which constitutes the essential ingredient of any lasting utopian society.

Jesus Christ, in his ministry, could not, therefore, have communicated his message of salvation any more clearly. And yet, the CBCP misconstrued him; it misinterpreted his words, misunderstood his deeds, and issued pastoral statements in stark contrast to the inspiring message of his words and stirring example of his deeds. Is it any wonder then that the Philippines is caught in its present political predicament and vicious cycle of corruption, human rights violations, intolerance, violence, division and hate?

eqfernando@hotmail.com

   
 

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: