The Manila Times

Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Saturday, May 24, 2008

 

ANALYSIS

Israel-Syria peace could defuse major conflicts in the Middle East

By Ron Bousso

JERUSALEM: Peace between Israel and Syria could defuse some of the most explosive conflicts in the Middle East and weaken Iran’s growing influence there, Israeli analysts say.

Israel and Syria, technically in a state of war since the Jewish state was born 60 years ago, announced on Wednesday that they had resumed indirect negotiations under Turkish mediation after an eight-year freeze.

The surprise announcement followed months in which reports of discreet peace overtures alternated with belligerent rhetoric.

The Israeli-Syrian border has remained calm for nearly 25 years, but the two enemies challenged each other regularly in Lebanon for 18 years until Israeli troops withdrew from the country’s south in 2000.

And while Israel has military superiority in the region, it considers Syria one of its biggest strategic threats.

The 34-day war in Lebanon between Israel and Hezbollah in 2006 underscored Syria’s role in sponsoring the Shiite movement, supplying it with ammunition that included thousands of Iranian-made rockets that wrought havoc on Israel.

Damascus also hosts the leaders of several Palestinian militant groups, including Hamas and Islamic Jihad, which have carried out dozens of deadly operations and suicide bombings in Israel.

Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, commenting on the peace talks, pushed home the danger of maintaining the status quo.

“The years which have passed since the negotiations were frozen did not improve the security situation on our northern border, which still serves as our primary source of concern for regional deterioration,” Olmert said in Tel Aviv.

But towering above the immediate points of friction between Israel and Syria is Iran, which has become Damascus’s closest ally in recent years. The strategic alliance between the two states was bolstered in 2006, when they signed an agreement on military cooperation against “common threats.”

Syria’s support of groups considered by the West as terror organizations and its constant meddling in Lebanon have placed Damascus on US and EU blacklists. That has isolated the country even further, and pushed it more firmly into the arms of oil-rich Tehran.

Israel believes it faces an existential threat from Iran, whose leaders have called for the destruction of the Jewish state.

At the same time, Israel, the United States and other powers believe Iran is seeking to develop a nuclear bomb—which Tehran denies.

Israeli experts believe that any attack on Iran would lead Syria, Hezbollah and Hamas, the Islamist movement that controls the Gaza Strip, to attack Israel together with Iran.

A peace agreement with Israel could pull Syria’s President Bashar Al-Assad out of his alliance with Iran and end its isolation by the West, analysts said.

“Israel wants to destabilize the ‘rocket coalition’ of Iran, Syria, Hezbollah and Hamas,” wrote Aluf Benn, diplomatic commentator of the liberal Haaretz daily.

“Israel will be deciding in the coming months whether to bomb the Iranian nuclear facility or invade the Gaza Strip. In both cases it would be better for Israel if Syria did not intervene on behalf of its allies,” Benn wrote.

Reserve Brigadier General Shlomo Brom, a senior research associate at Jaffa Center for Strategic Studies in Tel Aviv, told AFP the secular Syrian leadership’s alliance with the Shiite Iranians is one of convenience and not of ideology.

“Iran is Syria’s strategic backer in the face of the US and Israel, and once Syria normalizes its ties with the West, it will no longer need Iran,” Brom said.

Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni on Thursday reiterated the Jewish state’s long-standing demand that Syria stop backing and harboring militant groups.

This will be part of any future peace deal between the two states, Brom said.

“An agreement will completely change Syria’s strategic considerations . . . For Syria, talks with Israel are its way to rectify its ties with the West and the United States, most of all,” the former military intelligence officer said.

With Syria no longer dependent on Tehran’s military and economic backing, it would cease supplying Hezbollah with weapons and considerably limit Tehran’s “long arm” in the Middle East, analysts said.

And with peace deals signed between Israel and the Palestinians, Iran would lose one of its main arguments, Brom said.

“Iran needs a reason for friction with Israel. The second a peace agreement is signed with Syria and the Palestinians it will lose most of its excuses for its belligerency against Israel and support of terror organizations such as Hezbollah and Hamas,” he said.
-- AFP

   
 

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: