The Manila Times

Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Monday, May 26, 2008

 

INSIDE CONGRESS
By Efren L. Danao
CARP extension in
for intense debate

 
IN Barangay Mapangpang, Lupao, Nueva Ecija, most of the families of farmers who were beneficiaries of the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) now have bigger homes, and have acquired television sets, stereos and other gadgets that they could only dream about before. Oops, lest I give the wrong impression, I must hasten to add that their lives became more comfortable not because of CARP but in spite of it. You see, they acquired these assets because they have family members who have gone abroad as domestic helpers. In fact, very few young men want to work in the farm because they don’t see any progress in it.

I know about Mapangpang because our family used to own some farm lands there. My parents were farmers but through dint of hard work and penny pinching, they were able to acquire some lands there and in four other barangays, but the biggest was in Mapangpang. Our lands were reformed not by the CARP of 1988 but by a presidential proclamation in 1972, during the martial law days. My parents and I used to argue about this because I favored land reform while they bitterly opposed it. They would tell me that I never experienced their hard work and sacrifices in buying the farms, only to have them confiscated for a song. They were so heartbroken by the loss of their land that they decided to migrate to the United States and never returned until their death.

I am still for land reform. I agree with the social concept of land ownership for actual tillers but farmers must pay for the land given them at liberal terms. Unfortunately, many had failed to pay mainly because they did not have the money to buy pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers, and to pay for planting and harvesting. It took only one infestation of “tungro” and the farmer-beneficiaries immediately went under. Their finances sank deeper when they had to borrow from private individuals at high interest rates. With these problems, they could not amortize the land. Most of them ended up selling their “rights” to other farmers.

CARP extension being rushed

Now, the House and the Senate are trying to rush the approval of the extension of the CARP that is due to expire on June 17, 2008. If ever it would be extended, it should assure that both farmers and landowners would benefit. I take note of the admission by Agriculture Undersecretary Bernie Fontevilla at a Senate hearing last Wednesday that land distribution and acquisition under CARP had not resulted in improved quality of life among the beneficiaries mainly because of lack of support services.

Sen. Edgardo Angara, one of most knowledgeable about farming in the Senate, said that in other countries, farmers are rich and they are usually looked up to with respect. He is hopeful that the same thing would happen soon in our country but he stressed that appropriate investment in agriculture and adequate support services should be offered.

The CARP bill has a budget of P147 billion for the five-year extension period. Senators Juan Ponce Enrile and Joker Arroyo have a very sensible proposal—extend the life of CARP but no acquisition and distribution of new lands.

They said that the P147 billion should be used for extension services for existing beneficiaries. Sen. Rodolfo Biazon has another problem—most of the original beneficiaries are already gone. He said that about 350,000 beneficiaries had already sold their rights to other farmers and that these rights had been sold and resold a number of times even within the 10-year ban. He named a vast land in Mexico, Pampanga, that was sold by farmer-beneficiaries within two years after getting their certificates of land ownership.

Short notes

• I am impressed by the way Sen. Noynoy Aquino interpellated JPE on the proposed amendments to the Electric Power Industry Reform Act. The young solon really pored over related papers, and this showed in his scholarly and well-researched questions and observations during the floor debates. Well, one has to if he dares to tangle with an intellectual giant like JPE. Some more of this kind from him, and he will show to all that he really belongs to the Senate. Some are mere interlopers or even pretenders, you know.

• Senate Minority Leader Nene Pimentel Jr. launched his fourth book “Junketing—Senatorial Style” in a well-attended ceremony at the Senate last Thursday. I asked Nene if the book defends junkets. “You have to buy the book to find out,” he replied.

• Sen. Dick Gordon, concurrently chairman of the Philippine National Red Cross, heads the Philippine delegation to the Asean-UN International Pledging Conference for the Myanmar cyclone victims being held in Yangoon. PNRC has also offered to help China in rescue operations after powerful earthquake struck China on May 12.

efrendanao2003@yahoo.com

   
 

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: