The Manila Times

Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

 

INSIDE CONGRESS
By Efren L. Danao
Two-faced gov’t policy
on socialized housing

 
It looks like a case of the right hand not knowing what the left hand is doing. I am referring to the legislature trying to restructure socialized and low-cost housing loans while a joint venture involving a government housing corporation is foreclosing 52,000 housing units. While one wants to create more homeowners, the other is creating more homeless Filipinos.

Sen. Migz Zubiri has started sponsoring Senate Bill 1987 that seeks to restructure socialized and low-cost housing loans to benefit homeowners who had defaulted in the payment of their monthly amortization through no fault of their own.

The bill, with Senators Jingoy Estrada and Rodolfo Biazon as co-authors, covers all socialized and low-cost housing loans secured from agencies involved in the National Shelter Program with at least six months of unpaid amortization. A similar legislation, Republic Act 8501, was enacted in 1998 to benefit 181,349 homeowners who had failed to pay their loans because of the Asian financial crisis in 1998. Migz noted that only 19,612 of the 181,349 had availed of the law and of those who did, about 40 percent are again in default.

The government and the private sector are launching new socialized housing projects with low loan interest rate of six percent for members of Pag-ibig while present beneficiaries of the National Shelter Program are on the verge of being thrown out of their homes.

Liberal terms

I read a copy of the bill and it has many liberal provisions. The restructuring program covers even those who had taken advantage of Republic Act 8501. The bill condones all penalties and surcharges upon approval of the restructuring application. A reasonable portion of the interest on the housing loan shall also be condoned In addition, all accrued interests will be treated as non-interest bearing principal to be equally repaid during the term of the restructured loan.

The term of a housing loan account being applied for restructuring may be extended for a period longer than its original term to lower the amount of the monthly amortization. However, the extension should not exceed the difference between the borrower’s age at the time of application and age 65.

The program does not include accounts without a single payment, an account whose housing unit has been abandoned by the borrower-owner for more than two years from the date of delinquency, an account whose housing unit is occupied by a third party, and an account that has been foreclosed and its title transferred in the name of the housing agency or government finance insitutions.

While the legislature is all-heart for the homeowners in dire straits, the Balikatan Housing Financial Inc. (BHFI) is now foreclosing some 52,000 low-cost and socialized housing units. The BHFI has entered into a joint venture with the National Home Mortgage Finance Corporation (NHMC) to manage non-performing residential mortgage loans. The BNFI acquired the 52,000 units from government housing agencies at discounted prices and is reselling them at higher prices to original beneficiaries. Those who refuse will have their mortgage foreclosed.

An irate Speaker Prospero Nograles has rightfully directed the House Committee on Housing and Urban Development to investigate the BHFI. 

“This is a total reverse of government housing policy. We should instead restructure and condone penalties and surcharges and not remove the roof above their heads and eject them,” Nograles fumed

He found it ironic that the BHFI would be foreclosing the socialized housing mortgages when its mandate is to infuse much needed liquidity to the country’s low income housing sector.

House approves PERA

An e-mail from the House said the chamber had approved on third and final reading House Bill No. 3754, the Personal Equity and Retirement Account (PERA) Act of 2008. The e-mail described it as a “provident personal savings plan for the country’s retirees.” The authors included Reps. Ramon “Red” Durano (NPC, 5th District, Cebu) and Marcelino Teodoro (Lakas-CMD, 1st District, Marikina).

If the House bill is really meant for the country’s retirees, then it radically deviates from the Senate’s PERA version that was transmitted to the House on December 10, 2007. The Senate bill, principally authored by Sen. Edgardo Angara, is a provident savings plan not for retirees but for workers, especially those overseas who are not members of the Government Service Insurance System or the Social Security System—and there are hundreds of thousands of them. However, existing GSIS and SSS members may voluntarily contribute to the PERA.

Angara, one of my favorite senators, has filed a bill creating the Child Health Insurance Program, which provides children aged six and below a full range of health services like regular checkups, immunizations, prescription drugs, dental and eye care, among others. Children of indigent parents will receive free health insurance coverage.

efrendanao2003@yahoo.com

   
 

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: