Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Special Report

  Top Stories

  Opinion

  World

  Weekend

  Sports

  Career Times

  Property & 
   Home

 
 
 

Sunday, November 16, 2008

 

CENTER oF GRAVITY
By Rony V. Diaz
Down’s syndrome


IN the fact sheet on birth control that I wrote for the special report on reproductive health that appeared in the October 16 issue of this paper, I said that there are ways to tell before birth if a baby will have Down’s syndrome or not.

A reader wanted to know how this is done.

Down’s syndrome is a common congenital disorder that could affect babies born to mothers over 40 years. It’s named after an English physician, J. L.H. Down, who identified it in the middle of the 19th century. It’s also called mongolism.

The defect is traced to the failure of one chromosome of a germ cell to divide in the normal way to form a healthy ovum with 23 chromosomes. An ovum with 24 chromosomes, if fertilized, will develop into an embryo with an extra chromosome.

The head of a child with Down’s syndrome is small with prominent cheekbones, flat nose, slanted eyes and a fold over the inner part of either eye. Although a child with Down’s syndrome could live a reasonably normal life, it suffers in varying degrees a mental handicap.

The diagnostic tests for Down’s syndrome­—both invasive—are amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling (CVs). Fetal cells are taken from the embryo and the chromosomes counted.

The tests, however, carry a risk of miscarriage, about one in 200, according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Two genetic techniques have been developed recently that are non-invasive (Andrew Pollack, New York Times, October 9). They require only a blood sample from the pregnant woman.

The first test, called Sequenom, was developed by an American biotechnology company in San Diego, California and had been in use since June this year.

The other test was developed at Stanford University. A description of it was published on October 6 in The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences online.

Sequenom has still to be written about in a refereed journal.

Both tests, according to the New York Times’ “have perfect records so far.” However Seque-nom is gearing up to test its accuracy on 10,000 women and to release the results late next year. For now, the Sequenom test is used to see who would have to undergo amniocentesis or CVS.

Dr. Diana Bianchi of Tufts Medical Center and the president of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis said that there is a need is for a “non-invasive diagnostic test” but Sequenom’s results are “preliminary and promising, but not definitive.”

Other prenatalists say that these genetic tests are an improvement over present screening methods as amniocentesis and CVS miss 5 percent to 30 percent of Down’s syndrome cases. A false positive result of 5 percent means that many pregnant women undergo amniocentesis or CVS unnecessarily. The risk of Down’s syndrome in a baby born to a mother nearing 30 years is approximately one in 1000. So if 10,000 women in that age group underwent screening by amniocentesis or CVS only 10 actual cases would be detected. For the others, the tests would have been unnecessary and one of them might miscarry a healthy baby.

Most efforts to develop non-invasive tests are focused on fetal cells, which are “extremely rare and hard to detect.” (NYT, October 9).

The Sequenom and Stanford tests are based on the recent discovery of free-floating DNA in a mother’s bloodstream. However, the extra chromosome that causes Down’s syndrome is not easily detected in the woman’s DNA.

The inventor of the Sequenom test, Y.M. Dennis Lo of the Chinese University of Hong Kong, focused instead on the RNA.

A gene made of RNA is produced only when that gene is active. Lo isolated genes on Chromosome 21 that are active in the fetus but not in the mother. This means that RNA found in a woman’s bloodstream comes from the fetus. The test then looks for those versions of the genes inherited by the fetus from the father that differ from those inherited from the mother.

If the fetus has two copies of Chromosome 21, the RNA in the mother’s and father’s versions should be the same. If the baby has an extra copy of the Chromosome, one version would be more abundant than the other.

The Stanford technique involves determining the sequence of DNA fragments, millions of them, in the mother’s bloodstream. It does not matter if the fragments come from the mother or the fetus. Using the map by the Human Genome Project, the scientists can determine the chromosome each fragment comes from. If the fetus has an extra copy of Chromosome 21, there will be more fragments of that Chromosome.

The Stanford test has an advantage over the Sequenom technique in that it will work for any woman and for any ethnic group. This is important for Asians whose genes from the mother and father do not differ in the spots that are important for the Sequenom test.

Both the Sequenom and Stanford tests should be available in the Philippines soon if they are endorsed by the ob-gyn profession and the Department of Health.

opinion@manilatimes.net  

   
 

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: