Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Special Report

  Top Stories

  Opinion

  World

  Weekend

  Sports

  Career Times

  Property & 
   Home

 
 
 

Sunday, October 05, 2008

 

CENTER OF GRAVITY
By Rony V. Diaz
Bioplastics


THE Quezon City Council recently approved an ordinance prohibiting the use of plastics in markets, shops and restaurants.

I doubt if it can be enforced. The reason is simple: plastic trays, shopping bags and food wrappers are dirt cheap. The plastic trash that clogs storm drains and sewers cannot be eliminated, or even reduced, unless the government taxes them to pay, even partly, for the damage to the environment that they cause.

Ireland solved its plastic garbage problem by imposing such a tax, albeit a modest one. We should follow this example.

Recycling is the approach favored by the towns and cities that make up the metropolis. Cash for trash has had some success in cities like Makati, Mandaluyong and Quezon City. But recycling has not reduced the volume of thermoplastics.

Only about 10 percent of Metro Manila’s plastic trash is recycled. Many plastic products are composites of different materials that are hard to recycle. Eventually they also end up in landfills, rivers and the ocean.

The solution, obviously, is to develop a plastic material that biodegrades. The term biodegradable is poorly understood. Plastics that are petroleum-based do not really biodegrade in the sense that they break down due to the action of moisture or microorganisms. The better term is compostable. This means that the material decomposes by 90 percent or better within six months in a landfill or dump without producing any toxic substance. This is the definition and standard in Japan, the US and Europe.

There are three types of bioplastics that decompose according to this protocol. They are all made of starch, sometimes in combination with vegetable oil or animal fat to substitute for the polymers made from petroleum.

The use of cellulose as feed­stock for bioplastics is still a decade away at least, according to experts. The reasons are technical and economic. Cellulose-based methods use acid hydrolysis or enzymatic processes that at this moment have not left the laboratory and are still too expensive to commercialize.

There are experiments on combining acid hydrolysis and enzymatic reactions into a single process. If this can be done the discoverer would become very rich and the world would thank him for delivering it from a persistent pollutant. This too is still in the distant future.

What is commercial at the moment is polylactic acid or PLA, a starch-based bioplastic. It’s made by NatureWorks, a joint venture between the US agribusiness giant, Cargill and Teijin, a Japanese chemical company.

PLA can be used to make packages for fresh foods and juices as well as protective film for fruits, vegetables and flowers. Using basically the same manufacturing process, PLA can be the intermediate material for rigid items like disposable spoons, forks and knives or the casing of cellphones and laptops. Other applications are for textiles, diapers, sanitary napkins and filters.

According to NatureWorks, existing plants for petroleum-based polymers could be modified to use PLA. No new capital investment is needed.

The green movement has helped NatureWorks. Companies that want to earn a green reputation has made PLA profitable. Wal-Mart, for example, has switched to PLA and has required its suppliers to do the same.

Products made from PLA are compostable; they break down when exposed to moisture, microorganisms, and high temperatures.

But best of all, PLA is recyclable. It can be returned to its lactic acid base by a relatively simple process. Like glass or metal, it can therefore be reused again and again.

However, plastics made with PLA cannot be recycled with other plastics. PET or poly­ethylene terephthalate bottles, for instance, cannot be mixed with PLA because it will contaminate PET recycling.

The solution is to label plastics according to their feedstock or chemistry. Until PLA or another plant-based bioplastic become dominant in the plastic market, recycling will be a labor-intensive undertaking.

If we are serious about reducing plastic trash, the solutions are clear: mandate recycling, tax non-PLA plastics, and give incentives to the petrochemical industry to convert to PLA.

I repeat my tired refrain: shouldn’t the Department of Science and Technology encourage by policy our scientists to study enzymes? This is key not only to the production of compostable plastics but also to the production of biofuels.

opinion@manilatimes.net  

   
 

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: