Special Report

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Special Report

  Top Stories

  Opinion

  World

  Sports

  Career Times

  Property & 
   Home

 
 
 

Sunday, October 05, 2008

 

SPECIAL REPORT: METRO MANILA POLLUTION  

Is Metro Manila air now cleaner, fresher?

Kalikasan shouts: No! Yet anecdotal evidence may prove MMDA Chair Fernando right. Aside from Marikina, there’s a haven in Quezon City called Barangay Bagumbayan

By Rene Q. Bas, Editor in Chief

One beautiful Friday in August, Metro Manila Development Authority (MMDA) Chairman Bayani Fernando told an interviewer that the air has become fresher and cleaner in his area of responsibility.

I can say I have noticed that too in my daily drive up and down EDSA and Roxas Boulevard. Some of my friends also have felt there is less pollution nowadays.

Fernando explained that the decline in pollution level was mainly caused by the “massive sweeping and vacuuming of the National Capital Regions [NCR] roadways” that MMDA had begun to do in the later part of 2007. The agency has a Roadways Cleaning Operations Group (RCOG) devoted to this task.

The MMDA chairman should have backed his contention with scientific data of per cubic meter counts of total suspended particulates (TSP) in the air of various part of the NCR.

Instead, he cited the RCOG’s daily round-the-clock work of sweeping and vacuuming carbon dust and other pollutants (including emissions from automotive engines and particles from decayed trees and plants) and gave this as the reason for the fresher, cleaner air on EDSA, Roxas Boulevard, C-5 and other major highways.

With large sweeping machines mounted on trucks, RCOG also cleans up gutters and flyover walls.

All this RCOG work—in addition to city policemen, LTO and MMDA enforcers stopping smoke-belching buses, jeepneys and even privately owned vehicles —must surely have reduced air pollution considerably.

Chairman Fernando happily told his interviewer, which GMANews TV reported verbatim, “Damang-dama na nang lahat na malinis-linis na ang hangin at nabawasan na ang air pollutants sa mga naturang lugar dahil sa walang-tigil naming paglilinis mula umaga hanggang madaling araw (Everyone can now feel that air pollution in the metropolis has been reduced because of our non-stop dawn-to-dusk cleanup operations). “

Unfortunately, what most people do feel about cleaner Metro Manila air will amount to mere anecdotal testimony unless confirmed by the air-quality reports of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources’ Environment Management Bureau (DENR-EMB). These reports actually measure the TSP of selected areas in the NCR.

The absence of scientific data gave a militant environment-watchdog institution, one that has been observed to be markedly anti-BF (Bayani Fernando) but is rather well regarded by the scientists of the University of the Philippines-based AGHAM organization.

Two days after Chairman Fernando made his claim, the national coordinator of the Kalikasan People’s Network, Clemente Bautista, sent a statement to the media disputing Fernando.

Kalikasan said Fernando’s claim of a 50-percent improvement in Metro Manila’s pollution levels had no basis.

“Pasay, Makati and Valenzuela are among the areas that usually exceed the standard 230 micrograms per normal cubic meter for total suspended particulates (TSP),” Bautista said. He had documentary proof to back up his anti-Bayani tirade: the weekly air quality monitoring of the EMB.

 Bautista also pointed out that a World Bank technical paper had said that Metro Manila has a TSP frequently five times higher than the World Health Organization’s Air Quality Guidelines.

“Manila itself is known to be one the most polluted areas in the Philippines,” Bautista said. “The areas of Pasay and EDSA, which Mr. Fernando claims to have significantly improved are still among the most polluted areas in Metro Manila in terms of amount of TSP. Now, he wants people to believe that air quality has improved because of his mechanized street sweeping? No sane person would buy that claim.”

Bautista also cited a joint report of DENR and World Bank that there are nearly 5,000 premature deaths each year in Manila due to respiratory and cardiovascular diseases brought about by exposure to poor quality air.

“Eighteen million people still live in cities below desired and healthy living conditions even after the Clean Air Act of 1999 has been passed and countless other development projects and programs. People have endured years of listening to lip service without witnessing actual results and improvement in the Filipino quality of life,” Bautista said.

MMDA, as far as a segment of the Metro Manila population can see, has done a creditable job of improving the traffic mess.

Many, like this writer, would like to see done throughout the NCR what Chairman Fernando did when he was mayor of Marikina—and his wife the current mayor, Marides Fernando, continues to do—in that city.

He turned Marikina into one of Asia’s most environment-friendly, unpolluted, healthy, pleasant, livable and orderly cities.

Marikina’s waste management system is a model for the whole country.

The story of a barangay in Quezon City is told in the story “Barangay Bagumbayan shows how to cure urban blight.”

   
 

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Ping Oco, Franklin Bartolay
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: