The Manila Times

Business

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

 

Tuesday, October 07, 2008

 

MANAGING FOR SOCIETY
By Benito L. Teehankee
Responsible management 
education, Part I


Some observers believe that the corporate social responsibility movement is making progress. Others are more cynical and think that CSR is nothing but an elaborate PR mechanism for big business. The recent string of setbacks among large mortgage and banking firms in the US does not present a reassuring picture. Analysts trace the current financial mess to imprudent, though initially lucrative, investments in low-quality (sub-prime) mortgages made by large and well-established companies who should have known better. The cost of this in jobs and economic stability around the world, including the Philippines, is still impossible to calculate.

One may argue that promoting business ethics is an impossible proposition because greed and self-interest is the dominant motivation for business activity. The sub-prime crisis of today and the Enron crisis of a decade ago are just highly visible manifestations of a broad belief in the business world that greed is good and the ethics of self-interest is the only reasonable norm for business leadership.

I disagree. Professional values of technical competence, service and concern for the public interest are also viable complements to self-interest. If business managers can be trained in the way that doctors are trained to care for the health of their patients, over and above any pecuniary consideration, ethically responsible behavior can be a more common norm.

Rakesh Khurana, in his book From Higher Aims to Hired Hands, explains that the belief in providing a sound professional education to business managers was the basis for the founding of the first university-based business school in the United States—the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania founded in 1881. Simon Patten, director of the Wharton School, believed that there could be “no full discussion of economic problems without bringing political moral principles into relation with the economic.” What Patten and the other leaders of the early business schools, such as Harvard Business School, wanted was to deploy a cadre of highly trained individuals who would master the technical demands of even the largest business operations but always with an overriding consideration of the social impacts of business decisions—in short professional business leaders. The modern master of business administration degree, or the MBA, is descended from the programs of these early business schools.

The reasoning behind professional business education is straightforward. Just as doctors wield awesome power over the well-being of individuals and society through their ability to prescribe medicines and to use a scalpel, business managers wield similarly broad powers (some would say even much more than doctors) over the well-being of many people and society as a whole. Think about it: Who decide whether or not to produce and market a milk product, chemically tainted or not? Who decide whether or not to use women wearing almost nothing in highway billboards to push the sales of, ironically, clothing? Who decide whether or not to boost company profits by depriving workers of benefits and security tenure? Who decide to chase revenue targets by investing in low-quality loans? Business managers. Therefore, it is prudent for society to prepare business leaders who have the competence and character to make such decisions wisely for the common good as well as the good of the company.

While the intent of the founding fathers of business schools was wonderful in theory, the actual challenge of producing such MBAs is formidable. In fact, a number of the most ethically notorious corporations, including Enron, were known to be top MBA recruiters. Enron’s former CEO and CFO, both intimately involved in engineering the fatally flawed financial strategy of the energy company, were MBAs from top schools.

(To be continued)

Dr. Benito Teehankee is the Sen. Benigno S. Aquino, Jr. associate professor of business and governance at the Ramon V. del Rosario Sr. Graduate School of Business of De La Salle University-Manila. He may be emailed at teehankeeb@dlsu.edu.ph.

  
 

The PSE-Manila Times Equity Challenge 2008

Manila Times Friends

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

Severino O. Frayna Jr., Benjie Dela Rosa
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin

 

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

  Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: