The Manila Times

Regions

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Motoring

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Tuesday, September 02, 2008

 

HARDTOP
By Vernon B. Sarne
Is the new Honda Jazz better?


LET me come clean and say right off the bat that I own a first-generation Honda Jazz, a car I have splurged tons of beer money and spent dozens of sleepless nights on. I fell so much in love with this car that I just had to inhibit myself from writing an article about it for the sake of delicadeza. With the arrival of the second-generation Jazz, I find myself nursing ambivalent feelings. On the one hand, I want to be happy for Honda customers for having another reason to drive to the nearest showroom. But on the other hand, I want to smirk and find fault with the new Jazz model, just so I can continue feeling good about my own car, which I purchased only last year.

Here, then, is my best attempt at nitpicking. If Honda takes me off its media list after this column, I’d perfectly understand.

Yes, I know, the new Jazz looks pretty at first glance. It has a shorter, more delicate nose, and the protruding taillights are to die for. Add to this slimmer A- and B-pillars, and you have a model that does seem sleeker in every respect. But I still like my Jazz better, thank you very much. The old one looks more masculine and its appeal strikes me as more enduring. The new model is pretty in a Sam Milby kind of way; the old one is Robin Padilla all the way.

The new direction indicators in the side mirrors are a nice touch, except Filipino drivers don’t pay attention to turn signals anyway. The push-open mechanism of the fuel lid is thoughtful, but I’m not sure I want to explain to the gas-station attendant how it works every time I buy fuel.

My car has a 1.3-liter i-DSI engine, worth a paltry 81 horses and 118 Newton-meters of torque. The new Jazz’s 1.3-liter engine is already i-VTEC, and has upped its vital specs to 99hp and 127Nm. But does it really matter? I just go around a city with bumper-to-bumper traffic anyway. The 1.5-liter i-VTEC power plant has also increased its figures from 109hp to 118hp and from 142Nm of torque to 145Nm. I’ll leave it up to the owners of 1.5-liter Jazz units to determine for themselves if such an upgrade is really essential.

Also, if you’re an owner of a 1.5-liter unit, the Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) option is no more. Honda won’t say it, of course, but there had been loud whispers that the CVT components in the first-gen Jazz were so problematic that Honda decided to simply retire the feature in the new model. In its place is a pair of paddle shifters. Cool, yes, but I still like a manual tranny better. Driving is manlier that way.

The dashboard layout in the new Jazz is admittedly very stylish, but I like the materials used in the old model better. The new Jazz has built-in iPod connectivity, but the audio unit is modular; good luck upgrading to a higher-end sound system. The sci-fi-looking meters are indeed very modern now, but I fear they are too flashy not to distract the driver from, well, driving.

The new car is 55 millimeters longer and has a wheel-base that’s lengthier by 50 millimeters. These dimensions translate to a knee room increase of 40 millimeters. The new model is also 20 millimeters wider, resulting in 25 millimeters more of shoulder room. All this is very good, but I have no complaints with my current car in terms of space anyway. I sleep there all the time, in fact. But that’s another story.

The rear doors of the new Jazz apparently open to a generous 80-degree angle, a feature that has absolutely no use to me since I don’t have rear passengers and I don’t load huge stuff into my car. The base of the luggage room is now pegged at 605 millimeters from the ground. This is supposed to improve ease of loading items in the back. Thanks, but I’m not particularly lacking in height to greatly mind a slightly higher cargo-compartment opening.

The innovative ULT (utility/long/tall) seats are still a main selling point in the new Jazz, and have even been improved. This time, you no longer need to remove the headrests to fold them flat into the floor. The way I see it, however, only the laziest couch potato complains about removing a pair of headrests every time he wants to bring along a mountain bike.

Worse, the new Jazz 1.3 S manual is priced at P707,000 (the 1.3 S automatic is P747,000 and the 1.5 V automatic is P797,000). I got mine for just a little over P600,000.

Of course, you do realize that the above gripes have been written by someone whose beloved car has just been made obsolete from the current product line.

   
 

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Ping Oco, Franklin Bartolay
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: