The Manila Times

Business

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

 

Tuesday, September 09 2008

 
MANAGING FOR SOCIETY
By Ben Teehankee, Dba

Reversing the ethical tide (Part 2)

 
Reversing the ethical tide (Part 2)

Continuing from last week’s column on the options available to individuals who want to influence the ethical climate in their organizations, we go back to the human resource (HR) officer of a manufacturing company faced with the challenge of improving the working conditions of the workers in the factory. She raised the issue with the owners that workers were fatigued because they were not provided seats as they worked. She considered resigning because of her inability to improve the lot of the workers.

But the HR officer did not resign. She had to get those seats for the workers. Fortunately, the owner considered her an asset to the company and always gave her ideas a hearing. She would bring up her seat proposal every chance she got, improving her counter-arguments to the owner’s many objections. While the owner’s stubbornness frustrated her, she was always calm, friendly and respectful when making her arguments. In time, the owner relented; finally convinced that productivity gains would offset the cost of the workers’ seats. The HR officer was pleased with herself and continues to work in the same company today.

The HR officer had some advantages when she used dialogue to promote ethical change. Firstly, the owner respected her work and was, therefore, willing to listen. Secondly, she had the courage to speak her mind. Her professional principles drove her to improve a situation, which was unacceptable to her. Finally, she kept the owner engaged in the situation by addressing his objections in a way that made business sense. In short, she had the ability to lead for change without alienating the decision-maker.

Sometimes, the person involved in the ethical breach may not be so easy to dialogue with because of defensiveness or even hostility. This can make the personal risk to the ethics advocate quite high. Privately blowing the whistle to a manager responsible for or who has influence over the person involved in the breach may be called for. Whistle-blowing is difficult for most people. Childhood experience has convinced us that “telling” on people isn’t done. The “sumbongero” (whistle-blower) is universally despised by children. But professional managers aren’t children. Their level of maturity should remind them that legal and moral duties related to organizations go beyond personal or group loyalties.

As business journalists and government regulators worked to unravel the questionable accounting practices at Enron engineered by CFO Andrew Fastow, vice president Sherron Watkins wrote president Kenneth Lay anonymously: “I am incredibly nervous that we will implode in a wave of accounting scandals.” The letter detailed her concerns and the dangers to the company if these were not dealt with. Watkins identified herself shortly after and met with Lay. She did not find dialogue with Fastow feasible because of the latter’s intimidating personality. Enron did not mend its ways, leading some writers to criticize Watkins for talking to Lay instead of going public. However, her approach was meant to solve the problem internally through management without causing greater damage to the company through public whistle-blowing.

Another way to advocate ethics in an organization is by conscientiously objecting to a questionable practice or policy. An example would be when a manager vocally advises his colleagues against sexually offensive humor during meetings. Francis O’Brien, a research director at Searle & Co., objected in writing to the company’s claims about its Cooper 7 IUD product. His concerns were eventually vindicated when the company faced more than a dozen lawsuits related to the safety of Cooper 7.

The quest to promote ethics in organizations is never-ending and expecting top managers to do it by themselves is not realistic. However, the ethics advocate must weigh his approach carefully to avoid career suicide. If the latter is unavoidable, it would be best to go to an organization where the advocate can preserve his personal integrity.

Dr. Ben Teehankee is an associate professor at the Ramon V. del Rosario Sr. Graduate School of Business, College of Business and Economics, De La Salle University-Manila. E-mail him at teehankeeb@dlsu.edu.ph.

  
 

The PSE-Manila Times Equity Challenge 2008

Manila Times Friends

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

Severino O. Frayna Jr., Benjie Dela Rosa
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin

 

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

  Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: