The Manila Times

Top Stories

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

 
 
 

Friday, February 06, 2009

 

Charter change could trigger unrest

 
Former President Joseph “Erap” Estrada warned Thursday that there would be unrest if the government pushes ahead with unpopular moves to amend the 1987 Constitution.

He was referring to reports quoting Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile as saying that he agreed with the Palace and lawmakers in the House of Representatives that amending the economic provisions of the Charter is needed to open the Philippines to foreign investments.

To date, senators have managed to thwart attempts from the Palace and the House to amend the Constitution. But that may change with Enrile’s announcement.

In a statement, Estrada said, “The reason why I don’t believe Charter change will push through is that I trust that when push comes to shove, the Filipino people will take a stand and will not allow such moves.”

“I hope those who are pushing for Charter change will not let it come to that,” he added.

Estrada said he was confident that senators belonging to various opposition forces would continue to fight Charter change, or “Cha-cha.”

“Any form of Charter change, even for economic provisions alone, will have to be something that will be discussed or pursued by the next president in 2010,” Estrada said.
Mayor Jejomar Binay of Makati City, also chairman of the United Opposition, said he opposed Charter change, because the amendments would not likely be limited to the economic provisions.

He added that once the process started, lawmakers would be tempted to lift term limits and even entertain the possibility of changing the form of government from a presidential to a parliamentary system.

“The people know that that is the real agenda behind ‘Cha-cha,’ and not the economic provisions,” he said in statement also on Thursday.

He added that it is doubtful that amending the economic provisions would help boost the economy, saying that allowing foreigners to buy land would hurt the local real estate sector amid the global crisis.

Wrong economics

The independent think tank Ibon Foundation agreed with Binay.

“The basic argument for amending these provisions is that the wholesale removal of all manner of protection and regulation of key domestic sectors will increase foreign direct investment [FDI] flows into the country and hence promote national development,” according to a statement also on Thursday.

And “Cha-cha” proponents argue that strategic enterprises, natural resources, land ownership, public utilities, professions, education, mass media and advertising should be completely opened up to foreign capital. It seems that the mere presence of foreign capital is taken to mean that development is happening.

But Ibon said this argument is wrong. The think tank explained, “Foreign investment can play a role in domestic economic development only under very specific conditions and a liberal investment environment does not provide those conditions. This is proven by the experience of countries that have been able to use foreign investment to their benefit. It is also affirmed, unfortunately in a negative manner, by the poor experience of the Philippines with foreign investment.”

Foreign investment is potentially useful, but a government seeking real development must set the terms for this, because there is a conflict between the profits of private corporations and national development, the statement added.

House views

Congressmen insisted that they would not allow President Gloria Arroyo to extend her term beyond 2010, in an attempt to allay fears about Charter change.

Zambales Rep. Milagros Mag­saysay said the alleged move to extend the term of President Arroyo would fail anyway. Magsaysay added that the passage of House Resolution 737 of Speaker Prospero Nograles is focused only on amending economic provisions of the Constitution.

Cavite Rep. Elpidio Barzaga also said the Nograles resolution is exclusively for the liberalization of the economic provisions of the Constitution.

Northern Samar Rep. Paul Daza said it is better to discuss issues rather than to speculate about the supposed motives behind of Charter change. “Its a disservice for people to sidetrack the debate which should be taking place regarding the merits of allowing foreign corporations and individuals to own land.”

Quezon City Rep. Matias Defensor, chairman of the House committee on justice, stressed that the Nograles resolution has no politics at all. Talk of term extensions are mere intrigue, he added.

   

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

 
Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Severino O. Frayna Jr., Benjie Dela Rosa
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: