The Manila Times

Business

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

 

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

 

Digitel bucks alleged 
illegal charges on consumers

 
DIGITEL Mobile Phils. Inc. (DMPI) has denied a consumer group’s allegations that the telecommunication industry is “digitally robbing” mobile-phone subscribers, thus, a permanent cease and desist order (CDO) against telcos must be imposed.

In a reply to the show cause order issued by the National Telecommunications Commission (NTC), the operator of Sun Cellular said the Cellphone Owners and Users of the Philippines Inc. (COUP) “failed to prove or show that the alleged illegal acts were indeed committed by the respondents.”

DMPI also said the group did not say the extent each respondent committed the alleged illegal acts.

COUP had asked the regulator to issue a permanent CDO against Smart Communications, Globe Telecom and Sun Cellular for allegedly imposing “illegal charges.”

Among the complaints the group has presented include vanishing loads, dropped calls, spam messages, delayed messages, illegal charging, charging of calls on a per minute basis and illegal charges and billings.

The consumer group added that the mysterious and explained disappearance of loads, false advertisement and illegal deductions of loads were tantamount to “digitally robbing” the millions of subscribers of billions of pesos.

DMPI also denied that the occurrences of technical problems such as interrupted calls, dropped calls and poor signal are persistent and uncontrollable.

“Complainants failed to show that they have a legal right to be protected. This is evident from the very fact that they went amiss in presenting any proof or evidence that they are indeed subscribers of respondents which would entitle them to their rights as subscribers and consumers,” DMPI said.

The company said “mere allegations are not sufficient to overturn even the presumption that they have a legal right to be protected.”

DMPI has also opposed Coup’s request to open their books and provide copies of their financial records from prior years up to the present so the complainants could determine all the alleged illegal charges slapped on mobile phone subscribers.

The company said divulging and disclosing its operations and business practices through access to their documents and records is a trade matter. Compelling it to disclose such matters would “cripple respondent’s business and to place it an undue disadvantage.”

“This would result in nothing less than the probable demise of respondent’s business,” DMPI said.

The company said Coup has not shown its “legal personality to operate business, the roster of membership or number of its members as it alleged that all its members are subscribers of the respondents and proof that all its members, being subscribers of respondent have legal standing to bring this action in court.”

“Coup has failed to show that it can fairly and adequately protect the interest of the class as to stand for the latter’s representation in this action,” DMPI added.

In a phone interview, however, the group said that they represent the “great majority” of the consumers and subscribers.

“We have the legal personality to protect them,” Rod Domingo, Coup chairman said, adding that his group was registered in the SEC since December 2002.
-- Darwin G. Amojelar

  
 

Manila Times Friends

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

Severino O. Frayna Jr., Benjie Dela Rosa
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin

 

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

  Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: