Not all informants can qualify as state witness – Palace

6

NOT all who come forward to testify on the pork barrel scam will be taken in as state witnesses, according to Malacañang.

Advertisements

They will have to be screened by the justice department and their testimony scrutinized, Deputy Presidential Spokesman Abigail Valte said.

“The informants will be screened by the Department of Justice. Secretary Leila de Lima already made it clear that not everybody who volunteers [information on the case]will be enlisted as a witness. They will scrutinize the testimony and evaluate whether the information has an impact on the case filed before the Office of the Ombudsman,” Valte said in a radio interview.

At least two of the 38 people facing plunder and graft-related complaints in connection with the pork barrel scam have been provisionally accepted as state witnesses—Ruby Tuason, the former aide of former president Joseph “Erap” Ejercito Estrada, and Dennis Cunanan, former chief of the state-run Technology Livelihood Resource Center.

“As Secretary de Lima said, the justice department won’t have any reason to enlist somebody as a government witness if the testimony won’t add up to the merits of the existing ones,” Valte said.

She added that the government would not interfere in the investigation even if Cunanan implicated Director General Joel Villanueva of the Technical and Skills Development Authority in the illegal use of the lawmakers’ Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF).

“What we want is to find out the truth. The truth will be our evidence. Secretary Villanueva already said that he is willing to face investigation about this,” Valte said.

In his sworn statement, Cunanan claimed that senators Juan Ponce Enrile, Jose “Jinggoy’ Estrada and Ramon “Bong” Revilla knew that their PDAF was released to questionable non-government organizations.

Share.
loading...
Loading...

Please follow our commenting guidelines.

6 Comments

  1. In tact, there are at least 2 masterminds in the 10-Billion pesos PDAF scam. One is definitely the owner of the fake NGO, the other is the first Senator who collude with Janet Napoles. The latter than recommended the bogus scam to other Senators. DOJ needs to find out who is the first Senator in the scam.

  2. Only those credible, first hand knowledge information or dealings with the case should be accepted, not hearsays or presume. We should be strict and selective, because these will make these nation great again. These will be a make or break to curb or abate corruption once and for all. No big criminals like politician ever convicted of crimes even evidence are solid because of connections, but pity to the poor always convicted because of not represented, no connections and no money to bribe.

  3. Di qualified ang ibang witnesses dapat kakampi ng taga Malacanang! He he he! Ang taga palasyo akala nila lhat ng tao maloloko nila…sorry, hindi ako!

  4. Of course not all will be state witnesses because not all are willing to play along and follow Malacanang’s script. These witnesses are supposed being screened. I think the proper term is rehearsed so they know the script of this sarsuela that Malancanang is peddling to the public to divert attention to DAP and where all the money went.

  5. noelravalsalaysay on

    What a circus this Napoles plunder case? Everybody wants to be state witnesses, Napoles,Tuazon, whistle-blowers, etc. soon everybody except the senators will be left to defend themselves. Imagine state-witnesses contradicting each other. What if someone turn the table and include Ninoy’s cronies having the biggest take?