OSG weighs in on Marcos hero issue

4

The Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) has weighed in on the issue of whether former President Ferdinand Marcos is a hero by submitting to the Supreme Court (SC) 54 pages of attachments to its Consolidated Comment including 11 documents supposedly showing that Marcos was recognized by the government as a soldier, war hero and Medal of Valor recipient.

Advertisements

The documents were submitted in support of the OSG’s position that Marcos’ remains that have been unburied for more than two decades should be interred at the Libingan ng mga Bayani (Heroes’ Cemetery).

According to the Solicitor General, Marcos was called to active duty on November 15, 1941 as a Third Lieutenant under the United States Army Forces in the Far East (USAFFE). He remained a professional soldier until he left the military service in 1963 with the rank of colonel.

The USAFFE was active from 1941 to 1946.

The OSG said Marcos earned his Medal of Valor for “prevention of the possible decimation of withdrawing USAFFE troops in a ‘suicidal action against overwhelming [Japanese] enemy forces,’ thus helping delay the inevitable fall of Bataan.”

Annex 14 referred to General Order No. 167 dated October 16, 1968, which contained a two-page narrative of Marcos’ stand together with his men defending Salian Junction along the Abucay Line against the advance of the Japanese forces.

“For five days from 22 to 26 January 1942, he [Marcos] and his men stubbornly held their position at the junction in spite of additional severe casualties suffered, and successfully blocked the enemy’s determined advance…,” according to the document.

The same document, signed by Lt. Gen. Alfonso Arellano, then Armed Forces of the Philippines’ (AFP) Chief of Staff, said Marcos only had “a hundred fighting men against a regiment of about 2,000 highly-trained and well-equipped Japanese troops” when they defended Salian Junction.

Other documents submitted by the Solicitor General to the High Court included checks from the Philippine Veterans Bank (PVB) and the Land Bank of the Philippines (LBP) that were issued to Marcos’ widow, former First Lady now Rep. Imelda Marcos of Ilocos Norte, in 2003 and 2004.

The PVB checks were supposedly for the pension of Marcos as a retired soldier while the LBP checks were issued as “payment of gratuity pay/Medal of Valor.”

Also attached to the OSG’s Consolidated Comment was a two-page Certification dated March 4, 1986, issued by the AFP General Headquarters and signed by Philippine Army Lt. Col. Antonio Martin citing records stating that “Colonel Ferdinand E. Marcos [was a]recipient of a ‘Medal of Valor,’ three ‘Distinguished Conduct Stars’ and two ‘Distinguished Service Stars,’ among others.”

The Medal of Valor is the Philippines’ highest military honor that recognizes acts of courage and bravery above and beyond the call of duty.

It is awarded by the President of the Philippines to members of the Armed Forces of the Philippines and allied military personnel, including recognized guerrilla forces.

However, the Supreme Court is not expected to discuss whether or not Marcos was a war hero during the second round of oral arguments on September 7, according to two lawmakers.

The reason is that the SC “will not rule on a question of fact, that is whether the [Medal of Valor] is real,” Rep. Sherwin Tugna of party-list group Citizen’s Battle Against Corruption said.

“The [High Court] only decides on questions of law, not questions of fact,” Tugna pointed out.

The issue, Rep. Harry Roque of party-list group Kabayan also earlier said, is “whether he [Marcos] is entitled to be buried [at the Heroes’ Cemetery].”

The High Court recently stopped plans to bury Marcos at the Taguig cemetery, acting on a petition of victims of human rights violations against allowing interment of Marcos’ remains there.

Roque had filed a bill proposing to change the name of the Libingan ng mga Bayani to “Libingan ng mga Bayani at mga Dating Pangulo” (Cemetery for Heroes and Former Presidents) as a means to prevent public unrest in wake of opposition from some sectors to the planned burial of Marcos’ remains at the Hero’s Cemetery. ROMY P. MARIÑAS

 

 

Share.
loading...
Loading...

Please follow our commenting guidelines.

4 Comments

  1. David Michael Meyer on

    Te fact that he served as a military officer … does not deter from his acts whilst in office –He has plundered from the country ..Used his office to imprison unlawfully any one who stood up to him ..To make him Hero would make this country a laughing stock .
    .I am sure some could ague that Hitler was a hero – Genghis Khan; Napoleon ..One could put froward augments to support all these people…But to actually try to overlook the horrible atrocities they did –by citing some kind of military accomplishments..Begs the question why does the Philippines allow this to happen ..Making heroes of those that defraud the country, in such a shameless way… ..Is asking for more to do the same ..
    David M Meyer (PhD Psych }

  2. Juan T. Delacruz on

    Marcos is not a hero by any definition, but he was a soldier and fought for the country. Therefore, he should be buried in the LNMB. He was also a president with a good intention in the beginning, but got out of control in later years. We are all human beings that make mistakes everyday and every time I say my prayers ……forgive our sins, as we forgive those who have sinned against us….I will always have a change of heart. Let him be buried there and let’s move on…

  3. Juan T. Delacruz on

    The OSG should be very careful in proclaiming Marcos as a hero. As a matter of fact, all of those so called award and decorations are fake, and I will tell you why.
    1) Marcos’ unit was under USAFFE from 1941-1946, and no such award and decoration existed in his records at the U.S. Army record center. (RED FLAG)
    2) If the made up records show that Marcos served as a Third Lieutenant from November 15, 1941 to 1963 as a Colonel, he served over 22 years of service but did not file a military retirement after he separated from the service? Another thing, Third Lieutenant was never existed as a rank in the U.S. Army.( RED FLAG)
    3) The check that came from PVC and LBP and was issued to Imelda Marcos in 2003 and 2004 were NOT retirement checks, but came from the U.S. Veterans Administration for Marcos’ service during WWII. He was not the only Filipino Veteran that received check on these dates, but hundreds of them. The U.S Congress approved the amount of money to be distributed to the Filipino guerillas. The bottom line is this– U.S. Army have the records of all the guerillas fought side by side with them during the War and they also have the records on what award given to anybody, if there’s one.
    4) Medal of Valor, Silver Star, Bronze Star, Distinguish Service Cross, and all those medals they mentioned in this article can only be earned during combat operation. I say again, the medals that were mentioned in this article are fake and can only be earned in combat. Were these award given in 1968? Marcos service with USAFFE was from 1941 to 1946. (ALL OF THESE ARE RED FLAGS).
    5) Why I know so much about the U.S. Army? because yours truly, a second generation U.S. Army brat that served with the U.S. Army “honorably” for three decades. I have served faithfully, honestly, and honorably and the people of the United States ( through the President) have tanked me for my service to the country. I am bragging and patting my own back again, pero totoo naman.

  4. We are sick of the stupid question – is Marcos a hero that he deserves to be buried at the LNB? We should be asking the SC about Cory and Ninoy are they heroes worthy to be on the 500 peso bill?

    They are traitors are they not? They are failures as leaders are they not? The country is worse off because of them and their son is it not?

    Marcos once buried is out of sight and out of mind, what the OSG should look into is the bigger national sacrilege of seeing these fraudulent Aquino heroes every time we open my wallet.

    So let the debate begin, should the treasonous Aquinos be on our national currency?