|
By Dave L. Llorito, Research Head
and Kristine R. Payuan, Researcher
First of two parts
On March 26, 2002, Holy Tuesday, scavengers in
the dumpsite in Sapang Palay, Bulacan, woke up to find a number of
sealed drums, apparently left there by trucks the night before. The
drums were heaven sent, they thought. Cleaned and spruced up, they
could be sold as water containers.
Fifty of the scavengers, mostly children,
eagerly opened the drums. Hours later, they were in a hospital,
fighting for their lives.
The drums, it turned out, contained expired
powdered materials for dyeing cloth, a toxic and hazardous material.
It was so potent that three dogs that strayed into the dump that day
immediately died. Investigation showed that the powder came from
Universal Textiles and transported by Rota Industries, a hauler of
toxic hazardous wastes. Instead of bringing the powder to a nearby
treatment facility, the transporter’s workers brought the drums
to Sapang Palay, banking on the scavengers to get rid of the
containers.
Lormelyn Claudio, Environmental Management
Bureau chief for Central Luzon, said the Universal Textiles and Rota
Industries violated Republic Act No. 6969, the Toxic Substances and
Hazardous and Nuclear Wastes of 1990. Universal Textiles has no
resources to treat the powdered dye. Rota Industries, meanwhile,
failed to register and ensure a safe area for hazardous wastes.
The case of Sapang Palay’s dump being used as
disposal site for toxic and hazardous wastes (HW) is not isolated.
It is in fact an indicator a growing health threat in communities
surrounding Metro Manila.
According to the National Solid Waste
Commission, there are 121 open dumps in the National Capital Region
and the Southern Tagalog region. Due to the absence of an integrated
handling and treatment facilities for HW as well as the loose
enforcement of environmental laws, the open dumps (many of them
illegal but tolerated by local government units) became convenient
dumping grounds for noxious substances.
Hazardous wastes are produced by industrial
activities like manufacturing, mining, coal combustion, and oil and
gas production. They are considered “toxic and hazardous”
because of their characteristics like ignitability (may ignite or
cause fire), corrosiveness (liquid acids may corrode steel or harm
living organisms), reactivity (potential to explode or generate
highly poisonous gases), and toxicity (extremely harmful to health
through air intake or through drinking of contaminated water).
Household wastes like pesticides, cleaners, used oil, paints, and
solvents are also considered hazardous.
In a recently concluded report, “The Study on
Hazardous Waste Management in the Republic of the Philippines,”
the Japanese International Cooperation Agency (Jica) confirms the
growing problem.
“[T]here is no treatment facility handling the
HWs [hazardous wastes] that need special processes for
detoxification such as thermal decomposition, solidification, and so
forth. There is no landfill facility available to safely dispose
these HWs,” notes Jica in the report. “As a result of this, a
large amount of non-recyclable and non-treatable HWs is stored on
site by generators, or handled improperly by recyclers and treaters
… They pile up on site or may be illegally dumped somewhere.”
The technical staff of the Environmental
Management Bureau (EMB) of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (DENR) claims that about 60 percent of the total volume of
HW is recycled. Those recycled are HWs that are generally considered
“easily recyclable or treatable” such as waste oil, solvents,
and inorganic sludge containing valuable metals.
However, they also admitted to The Manila Times
that about 40 percent of the HW generated in Metro Manila and the
Calabarzon areas are unaccounted for. They too would admit
possibility that most of them are dumped in unobtrusive lots in the
metropolis. These “unaccounted wastes” are those that require
“special processes” for detoxification and disposal.
Jica estimates about 2.4 million metric tons of
HW are being generated each year. About 78 percent is accounted for
by the National Capital Region, Southern Tagalog, Central Visayas,
and Central Luzon.
In terms of types of HW generated, 22.64 percent
(545,631 MT) are alkali wastes, Jica says. Alkali waste includes
caustic soda, potash, alkaline cleaners, ammonium hydroxide and lime
slurries. The next biggest HW is waste oil making up 20 percent.
Inorganic chemical wastes that include arsenic
and its compounds, boron compounds, cadmium and its compounds,
chromium compounds, lead compounds, and mercury account for 335,014
MT, or 14 percent.
Acid (177,9456 MT) accounted for 7.35 percent,
and plating wastes (174,945 MT), 7.26 percent. Acid wastes include
sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, phosphoric acid,
hydrofluoric acid, and organic acid. Plating wastes may contain
highly concentrated cyanide solutions.
These five types of wastes make up for 71.54
percent of the total volume. The rest is composed of organic wastes,
putrescible/organic wastes, textile, immobilized wastes, and
miscellaneous wastes.
The figure does not include the HW produced by
households. Some environmental experts estimate that about 10
percent of the total municipal solid wastes (MSW) or trash coming
from households, commercial, industrial, and institutional
establishments could be considered hazardous wastes.
The household MSW could include toilet cleaners,
furniture polish, carpet shampoo, bleach-based cleaners, air
fresheners, paints, disinfectants, paint removers, used batteries,
paint thinners, used oil, among others. Since there is no effective
waste segregation yet for household HWs, they are mixed with other
types of wastes and burned in dumps and landfills.
Cezar E. Pacheco, president of the Philippine
section of the Air and Waste Management Association, says
multinational corporations who are conscious of their global
corporate images are exporting their HW to European countries like
France, Belgium, Great Britain, Netherlands, and Germany for proper
treatment and disposal. This is particularly true for companies that
have or aspiring to have ISO 14001 certification, a proof that the
company adheres to the best global practices in environmental
management.
Local companies cannot afford to “export”
their hazardous waste for proper disposal. “Local companies will
tell you to go to hell if you appear at their doorstep telling them
to have their hazardous wastes exported somewhere,” Pacheco says.
Pacheco says these companies would rather store
their wastes on-site, hoping that an appropriate HW handling
facility would be available in the future. However, many of them
could run out of storage space and are forced to contract out the
disposal of their wastes.
“Many of these hazardous substances could have
ended being disposed of in secret landfills, creeks, rivers, and
ravines,” says Pacheco who manages a firm exporting HW to European
countries.
The disposal of wastes in open dumps makes these
places doubly dangerous to humans. Dumps are usually open spaces.
Rainwater easily gets through, percolates through the wastes,
dissolving its constituents to produce leachate. The waste
constituents find their way to the groundwater, contaminating the
water sources of nearby communities.
Pacheco says “landfill gas,” or methane
generated during the decomposition of organic wastes, easily ignites
fires, leading to the burning of garbage. Operators of the dumps
also regularly set fire to refuse to reduce the volume and prevent
them from becoming “smokey mountains” that attract the attention
of residents and authorities.
The process of combustion in these dumps is
usually incomplete, producing carbon monoxide, furans and dioxins,
which considered highly toxic substances. This is particularly
true when the garbage being burned contains chlorinated organic
substances.
Some of the highlights of the Jica report seem
to confirm many of the deepest fears regarding HW:
1. HW generators are not well aware of the
importance of HW categorization and segregation at the source for
proper hazardous wage management as required in government
regulations.
2. Collectors of municipal wastes also act as
recyclers. If the collector of municipal waste gathers waste oil,
and other hazardous wastes, it is unlikely that the waste is treated
properly through the recycling route. Other HWs are mixed with the
municipal waste and brought to the municipal landfill.
3. The concept of intermediate treatment of HW
prior to disposal is absent in the Philippines as there are no
landfill standards for industrial wastes as well as no landfill for
HW.
4. Some of the collectors are storing the HW in
their own premises, but it seems the others are disposing it
somewhere else illegally. Some of the generators are obliged to
commission local treaters, which are doubtful in terms of their
treatment capability, only because these treaters are registered
with EMB and there may be no other alternative.
5. All HW transporters are required to display
appropriate warning signs on their vehicles transporting the HW.
However, except for tank lorries, most fleets or vehicles transport
HW without any warning signage. In some cases, transporters load
used batteries inside vans, used oil in drums and HW sludge in open
trucks without using signboards. This is strictly illegal.
6. Some plastics and resins are used as fuel by
cement plants. Municipal waste collectors also collect these kinds
of wastes, however, treatment of these wastes is troublesome.
7. In Japan, firms no longer use chlorinated
organic compounds such as trichloroethylene (TCE) because it is
cancer-causing. In the Philippines, a considerable volume of
trichloroethylene is still being used because it efficiently removes
grease. Alternative solvents such as isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and
distilled water washing are used in the country but becoming more
unfavorable for some companies because of their flammability. Since
the Philippines has yet to develop environmental quality standards
for groundwater, the use of TCE is not yet regulated.
Conclusion
|