Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback     Help  
 
 

Posted on Thursday, October 24, 2002

  

Quezon’s feudal  system blamed for insurgency

By Dave L. Llorito, Research Head

Conclusion

(The communist insurgency is the single biggest reason why Quezon province remains a backwater in terms of economic growth and development. Potential businesses and development investors are wary of putting money in Quezon despite its vast potential because of the rebels’ strong presence there and the “revolutionary” taxes they exact. The conclusion of this special report explains how feudal vestiges strengthen the communist movement in Quezon.)

Ending Quezon’s economic isolation is definitely one big step the government has taken to spur growth in the province. Just a decade ago, traveling to Bondoc Peninsula from Lucena to Mulanay was seven-hour ordeal over about 150 kilometers of rough roads. These days, travel time is about four hours over much-improved concrete highway up to Pitogo, thanks to the P1.64-billion Bondoc Peninsula Roads (BPR) project that was launched when Fidel V. Ramos was president.

BPR is part of the sixth road package being financed by the Asian Development Bank. The project covers 148.5 kms. of paved arterial road from Malicboy in Pagbilao to Mulanay in Bondoc. Also part of the project is the concreting of a 20-km. highway from Mulanay to San Narciso. The 40-km. stretch between Pitogo  and Mulanay, if one passes through Macalelon, General Luna and Catanauan, is still bad but residents are hoping that it, too, would soon be paved.

Jose Enriquez, executive director of the Bondoc Peninsula Development Project (BDP), says that the road to Mulanay would be completed in a year or two. “By that time, travel to Bondoc would be much easier. Travel time from Lucena will probably be down to just three hours.”

Enriquez says that about six jeeploads of saba bananas, equivalent to about 20 tons, leave Catanauan each day for markets in Lucena and Metro Manila. Recently, he says, one agribusiness firm has offered to buy Bondoc’s saba to be used as raw material in making ketchup.  He says that the offered price is low — only P4 per kilo, but with a much-improved road network, farmers could have lower transport cost, making the proposed business deal potentially viable.

“Now we are studying how we could respond to be able to produce the required volume,” Enriquez adds.

Prudencio Maxino Jr., mayor of Mulanay, says that with the completion of the BPR roads, much of Bondoc could forge stronger economic linkages with the rest of the province.

“These new roads would generate a lot of economic opportunities for the Mulanay as well as the rest of Bondoc Peninsula,” Maxino says. “My only complaint is that construction of these roads seems to be very, very slow.”

Revitalizing the coconut industry and agricultural diversification appears to be another surefire formula.  Being highly dependent on the coconut industry, Quezon took a big blow when copra prices plunged due to keener competition from other vegetable oil substitutes in the world market.

From the late  ’70s until the  ’80s, the Marcos government collected the coconut levy meant to generate funds to finance programs to improving the lives of coconut farmers.  The coconut levy ended up being controlled by Marcos’ cronies. This issue agitated Quezon’s peasantry, fueling the rapid rise of communist insurgency in the area.

For Enriquez, however, the more basic concern is to address a deeper problem: Bondoc’s “feudal structure” characterized by an inequitable land ownership pattern and the inability of poor peasants to access productive resources.  He says that despite some gains in agrarian reform, much of the huge land holdings are still owned by a few families. It is widely believed that this “feudal structure” is one major source of discontent among the peasantry, making them vulnerable to communist agitation.

“There exists a persistent feudal exploitation brought about by an extreme insufficiency of information on basic rights of tenants and an absence of viable mechanisms for resolving agrarian reform-related conflict,” says BDP in a report.

In 1990, there were 55,227 households in the area.  Only 1.1 percent of them control 44,333 out of the 100,000 hectares that are due for land distribution under the government’s agrarian reform program. In a report, BDP says the biggest landholdings in Bondoc Peninsula are the following:

1. Doming Reyes with family holdings estimated at 12,000 to 16,000 hectares in three municipalities.  BDP notes that prior to 1996, not a single hectare was included in the agrarian reform program because of the landowner’s “fearsome reputation.” Out of fear, not one tenant wanted to apply for agrarian reform coverage. Tightly guarded, the lands are hard to penetrate. After five years of trying, BDP was able to facilitate the distribution of the certificate of land ownership agreements (CLOA) covering 174 ha.  A total of 451 ha. are also due for distribution.  These figures hardly made a dent on the landowner’s monopoly over large tract of lands.

2. Uy family with total landholdings of 3,500 ha. Despite the vigorous organizing work in partnership with non-government organizations (NGOs) and militant groups, not a single hectare has been distributed.  BDP, however, claims that 1,138 ha. are “nearly consummated” or almost a done deal for farmers. Some farmers have also stopped paying their shares to the landowners.

3. Matias estate, covering 2,800 ha. Not a single hectare has also been distributed. Despite the existence of an agrarian reform program for more than a decade, tenants are still in the process of petitioning for agrarian reform coverage for areas involving 105 ha.

4. Tan family/clan, covering 3,000 ha. As of this date, not a single hectare has been distributed. A total of 400 ha. have been “engaged” (BDP’s term for being petitioned for CARP coverage) by BDP and other peasant organizations, but most of these lands are “problematic.”

5. Superior Agro-Industrial estate, covering 540 ha.  Not a hectare was distributed. Farmers were continuously harassed and some were evicted. The landowner was even able to secure exclusion from the Department of Agrarian Reform.  About 13 farmers are pushing for leasehold implementation, a deliberate strategy to force the owner to submit his properties for land distribution, but there are no positive results as of this writing.

6. Timberland areas covering 58,000 ha. have also been targeted by BDP and peasant groups for reclassification and redistribution. The process has not gone beyond reclassification.

Enriquez explains that these are just among the glaring problems of land concentration.

Since 1996, BDP and its partners had achieved “land tenure improvement” in over 9,125 lands. However, he also clarifies that only 1,918 lands involved the distribution of CLOA, while 472 cases involved the transformation of peasants’ tenure from tenant to leaseholders.  He blames stiff resistance from landlords for the slow implementation of land reform.

The rest are “PO-controlled lands” (people’s organizations) covering 6,018 ha of public lands and 717 ha. of private ones.

“Without a meaningful land redistribution, the gains of good infrastructure would largely accrue to a few who are already well off,” says one BDP technical staff.

First Part

   
 
 
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Francis Andaya, Judee Perculeza, Marizhen Doctora
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
Strategic Publishing Co., Inc. Company. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: