|
By Patricia L. Adversario, Senior Reporter
First of two parts
Early next month, some 200 bancas will slice
through the brackish waters of Laguna de Bay with an urgent message
for Malacañang — stop the construction of the P3.3-billion dike
along the north Laguna lakeshore.
Farmers, fisherfolk, and fishpen operators from
27 towns along Laguna Lake plan to converge along the riverbank of
Malacañang to stage on water their dramatic resistance against the
construction of the lakeshore road dike.
At the outset, the objective of the flood
control project is clear: protect some 600,000 residents in the low
coastal areas of Taguig, Pateros and Pasig in Metro Manila, and
Taytay and Cainta in Rizal, from floodwaters coming from the lake
which could take four months to subside.
But lack of consultations with the affected
communities and uncoordinated government policies have put the
project under a cloud.
Misinformation abounds about the role of the
dike and how it will affect the lake and the people who live around
it, partly because the affected residents have been left out of the
consultation process.
The government is learning that it has to change
its approach. It used to be that informing the community about the
project was enough. What if the community has different views about
government’s plans?
The results have been expensive. The project,
which was suspended from November 2001 to April 2002 because of
protests from residents, has incurred almost half-a-billion pesos in
damages because of the delay.
The project, which started in late 2000, was to
have been completed by 2004. The completion date has since been
moved to 2006.
The cost of the project’s suspension does not
include costs in the delay of the construction of the proposed
Napindan Bridge in Taytay for which almost P20 million had been
spent. Construction of the bridge was suspended because of protests
from informal settlers who claim the bridge will dislocate them.
Massive pillars of steel that had been bored
into the lakebed are rusting in the lake waters. There was more
evidence of an abandoned construction site on the riverbank where
piles of rusting steel trusses lie covered with weeds.
10-year-old ECC
Excluding the bridge sections, the road dike
will stretch 9.5 km from Lower Bicutan, Taguig, to west of the
Mangahan Floodway. The dike has an average height of 3.5 meters
and will be built with a gravel-paved road for light vehicles.
Also to be built are four regulation ponds, four
pumping stations, floodgates and two bridges crossing the Napindan
River and the Mangahan Floodway.
Funds for the project came from the Japanese
government as part of the 21st Yen Loan Package granted in March
1997. Because of tedious pre-qualification and bidding procedures,
it was only in September 2000 that construction work started.
Almost 10 years after the environmental
compliance certificate (ECC) for the project was issued in June
1993, environmental experts now question the validity of the
certificate. Conditions have changed since then and the process
needs to be reviewed.
One critical change is the dramatic increase
in the number of residents on or near the areas where the dike will
be constructed.
From only 280 families, the number has grown to
almost 2,000 families, most of them, living on the floodplain of
Lupang Arenda in Taytay and the Mangahan Floodway.
The UP School of Environmental Science and Management
(SESAM) in Los Baños, in a report to the Laguna Lake
Development Authority (LLDA) in November last year, said that this
change will influence the extent of impact and the cost-benefit
ratio of the project.
For example, the Bay Breeze Subdivision, an
upscale housing subdivision with about 220 concrete houses in Taguig,
lies outside the protected area of the road dike. The possible
damage to property has not yet been included in the social impact
assessment.
The SESAM, which reviewed the documents that
were the basis for the ECC, also questioned the scope of the
environmental impact assessment (EIA), which was conducted from
1989-1992. It noted that the EIA was limited to the five
municipalities of Pasig, Pateros, Taguig, Cainta and Taytay that
would benefit from the flood control project.
The EIA did not look into the biophysical and
socioeconomic conditions of the nearby Laguna lakeshore towns, like
Biñan, Sta. Rosa, Calamba and Los Baños, and “totally eliminated
the possibility of causing increased flooding in these areas,”
said Dr. Antonio J. Alcantara, dean and professor of SESAM, who led
the team that conducted the review.
“There is a probability that communities
adjacent to the road dike project will experience increased flooding
at least for a duration of time than they used to have,” said
Alcantara.
The EIA assumed that at a lake water level of
12.5 meters when floodwater is pumped out of the road dike protected
area into the lake, the level would only rise by 8 millimeters. But
lakeshore residents said that even at 12 meters, they already
experience flooding.
Questions on water level
At the heart of the controversy — as well as
the source of misinformation — are questions on what will be the
water level after the dike is built.
The dike’s design places the highest level at
13.8 meters, based on a 40-year flood probability.
Fisherfolk suspect that the dike is being built
to maintain the level at 12.5m (average water level) or 13.8m.
Liserio Alon-Alon, 71, a fisherman and president
of the Taguig Coalition Against the Dike, said raising the water
level is part of a government’s plan to tap the lake as a water
source for Metro Manila and the industrial towns around the lake.
He said the lake’s waters will also be kept at
high levels to provide continuous water supply for cooling power
plants and industrial facilities near the lake. Alon-Alon said this
shift in lake use would kill the fishing industry because salt water
from Manila Bay that flows through the Napindan River can no longer
reach the lake.
Salt water from Manila Bay can only enter if the
water level at Laguna Bay is lower than the former. The DPWH,
through the Napindan Hydraulic Control Structures, controls the
flow.
Alicia E. Bongco, project coordinator of the
LLDA’s Sustainable Development of the Laguna de Bay Environment,
confirmed plans by LLDA to build a freshwater reservoir on the lake,
but also stressed that Laguna de Bay will still be a multipurpose
lake. “The lake will be used both for fisheries and for freshwater
supply,” she said.
Farmers and fisherfolk also maintain that the
dike will still cause prolonged flooding. It does not help the
Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) that it had built the
two existing flood control systems along Laguna Lake — the
Napindan Hydraulic Control Structures and the Mangahan Floodway.
Residents from Taguig, Bicutan and Taytay, said
they continue to experience long-term flooding in spite of these two
flood-control projects.
“If we go by track record, any flood-control
project by the DPWH means floods,” said one resident.
Dr. Leonardo Q Liongson, director of the
National Hydraulic Research Center based in UP Diliman, however,
said that any “significant increase in the water level of the lake
will not be caused by the dike. The flooding will come from the
Mangahan Floodway.“
The floodway was built to divert the floodwaters
from Marikina River that normally flows into Pasig River to mitigate
the flooding in Manila.
“Because the water level in the lake seems to
be the lynchpin that underlies the eloquence of the daily life of
the fishermen and farmers, any amount of uncertainty about its
future value after the project is completed would be a cause for big
questions or total project rejection,” said SESAM’s Dr.
Tolentino B. Moya, a soil and water engineer.
Rodrigo I. delos Reyes, DPWH’s project manager
for the road dike, explains that with the dike, water that would
otherwise have flooded the five towns would be confined in the lake.
The displaced water will find its way to the other areas and should
increase by only two inches the water level in these areas.
To most residents, it is still not clear what
this two inches of additional water means in the outlying areas.
“What is clear is at least one area along the lake will be
saved,” said Delos Reyes.
Such piecemeal solution does not hold water for
those who advocate an integrated development plan for the lake.
Said Dr. Moya: “We can learn from the people
who live there. The simple folk look at the lake as an ecosystem.
Everything is connected. They’ve got a systemic view of how this
dike relates to the entire lake, and not only to the five towns that
will be protected.”
Second Part
|