Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback     Register     Help  
 
 

Posted on Monday, July 19, 2004

 

Higher oil tariff dims hope
for fuel price rollbacks

By Max V. De Leon , Reporter

First of two parts

FORGET about oil price rollbacks. This, in effect, is the message the government would be conveying when President Arroyo signs within the week an executive order raising the tariff on petroleum products.

The issuance of the EO, which a Manila Times source said would be announced by Mrs. Arroyo in her State of the Nation address (SONA) on July 26, will raise the surcharge on imported crude oil and imported refined petroleum products from the present 3 percent to about 5 to 7 percent.

The three-percent levy is specified under Section 6 of the Oil Deregulation Law (Republic Act 8479).

The section explains that beginning January 1, 2004, or upon the implementation of the Uniform Tariff Program under the World Trade Organization and Asean Free Trade Area commitments, “the tariff rate shall be automatically adjusted to the appropriate level notwithstanding the provisions under this section.”

With the country on the brink of a fiscal crisis, the government is about to amend the provision as part of the measures that the administration is putting up to narrow the widening budget deficit.

The petition filed by the Department of Energy before the Tariff Commission shows that the government expects to raise from P4.48 billion to P14.8 billion a year from the 5- to 7-percent increase in the tariff, based on the 2004 projected importation volume.

Raising the duty, according to industrialist and oil price watch advocate Raul T. Concepcion, will erase all hopes of a rollback in the prices of gasoline, diesel, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and kerosene.

Concepcion said with the drop in crude prices in the world market in May and June, a P1.50 drop in the per liter price for gasoline, 57 centavos for diesel and 86 centavos for kerosene should have been forthcoming.

The rollback should provide temporary relief following the recent fare increase.

Fernando Martinez, spokesman for the new oil players, confirmed that oil companies would not be able to carry out price cuts once the EO takes effect. He said the tariff hike could result in as high as P1.20 a liter increase for gasoline and P1.50 for diesel.

Martinez said oil firms are still trying to recoup the losses from shouldering the upsurge of prices of petroleum in the world market last year.

“Once the tariff hike is carried out, I think there would even be an increase [in oil prices],” Martinez said.

He said a rollback is only possible only when the drop in prices in the world market is bigger than the effect of the tariff increase.

But this is farfetched at this time, Martinez said, since the price of crude in the world market is again rising.

The increase, he said, would likely be passed on to the consumers in the form of a price hike next month.

Concepcion said he had asked the energy department to carry out the tariff increase in about three months, or until such time when the public has seen the administration is really sincere in its promises to improve the lives of the people through its 10-point agenda.

However, Concepcion said he believes that suspending the oil tariff increase would only add to the country’s woes since it would result in foregone revenues badly needed to help stave off a fiscal crisis.

“I think it’s a done deal. We just have to bite the bullet and choose between the lesser evil,” Concepcion said.

He added he was told by the DOE that should the President fail to sign the EO before July 26 when Congress opens, the next window of opportunity will come in November when the House of Representatives and the Senate adjourn for the holidays.

Under the Tariff and Customs Code, the President can only introduce changes in the tariff schedule when Congress is not in session.

The Times source said the draft of the EO prepared by the Tariff Commission after it conducted a hearing on Tuesday was approved by the Tariff Related Matters (TRM) technical committee Thursday.

The draft would be sent to the Cabinet TRM and the National Economic and Development Authority board for final approval before it is sent to the President for signing.

The approval of the Cabinet TRM and the NEDA Board is only a formality once the draft EO is approved by the technical committee, the source said.

He said the government is bent on implementing the order even if all those who attended the public hearing and sent their response to the petition of the DOE opposed the measure.

Martinez himself believes that the EO would be signed. He is also quick to say that the oil companies will definitely pass the higher tariff on to the consumers.

“We will just act like collectors for the government,” Martinez said. He said the government is aiming at the wrong target when its plan is actually to give oil companies additional tax burden.

In 2003, Martinez said the 50-company oil industry earned only P7 billion. This, he said, is only about half of the earnings of the two biggest telecommunications firms which took a profit of more than P14 billion each in 2003.

A proposal to impose a tax of up to 20 centavos for every text message was shot down by Malacañang because of the resulting public outcry.

The Times source said it is possible the President would be swayed into dropping the EO if the clamor against it is strong enough.

If the tariff is raised, what the people, especially the commuting public, should just do is make the government commit to use half the money to be collected from the measure in improving the country’s road networks, Martinez said.

“I think the drivers would not mind the effect of this if they see improvements in the roads because they would also benefit from it,” he said.

At this time, the source said, there is no indication that the funds would be allocated to infrastructure. He said the prime consideration of the administration is to raise more funds to cushion the budget deficit, which stood at P77 billion as of May, or only P2.5 billion short of the half-year target of P79.5 billion.

(Part 2 will tackle the EO as contrary to R.A. 8479 and multilateral trade agreements)

Part 2 |

    
 
 
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Francis Andaya, Judee Perculeza, Marizhen Doctora, Shey Silayan
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: