Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback     Register     Help  
 
 

Posted on Saturday, September 04, 2004

 

Unfulfilled promises litter Smokey Mountain

By Lakambini A. Sitoy, Karen Capino, Janice Alonso

Second of three parts

The issue of whether R2 Builders breached its agreement with the government has been raised by Sen. Miriam Defensor Santiago.

“[Romero] promised in the contract that he would transform the entire Smokey Mountain area from the filthy, stinking, miserable area that it is, a black mark on Metro Manila into, in effect, a Shangri-La for the poor, plus an institute where the jobless squatters could be taught vocational training,” she told The Manila Times. “If we want to assess whether the developer deserves payment, all we have to do is go to Smokey Mountain and look for those things that he promised. They’re not there.”

Jose Baer, whose family has lived in the area since 1981 and scavenged off the dump, would agree.

The 40-something tricycle driver worked for R2 Builders, helping to vulcanize tires, but left when the company assigned him to Surigao for a five-year stint, but without visits to his family.

Baer is content with the accommodations, but says “there are no training or livelihood centers in the area that would help residents improve their capabilities to earn a decent living.”

Senator Santiago has also raised the issue of health hazards to the residents. Garbage dumped over the years has settled into the marshy ground, gradually compacting to a depth of some two meters.

“[Romero] did not remove Smokey Mountain, he leveled it,” she said. “The understanding was that he would remove it because [the dump] was full of toxic materials, garbage over the years exuding poisonous fumes and gases. So when he simply leveled it and built the houses over it, those houses became inhabitable. Slowly, every day [residents] are poisoning themselves by inhaling gases from the ground.”  

Santiago’s concerns are echoed in Asorya’s complaints: “Some children have been taken to San Lazaro Hospital on account of dengue fever,” he said.

The question the senator now raises is why taxpayers’ money should have been awarded to R2, to the tune of some P3.1 billion, plus another P1.8 billion under a contract this year with the Arroyo administration.

The series of joint-venture agreements between R2 Builders and the government through the National Housing Authority stipulated that the developer should fully finance the project. But with only a few tenements built, R2 declared it had run out of money.

A number of reasons were possible for this. On its website, on a discussion on the upgrading of slum communities, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology named the large increase in costs as one of the failings of the Smokey Mountain project.

The website puts the cost of the project at an estimated P488 million originally. By project completion, it pegs the actual cost at P975 million, or a 100-percent increase.

“A large increase in cost occurred due to delays associated with the massive size, complexity and experimental nature of the project,” the website states. “Delays were associated with project start-up, higher than expected land acquisition and reclamation costs, petroleum price increases, and a lack of detailed design and engineering on major civil work at appraisal.

“Cost recovery was the weakest element of this project,” the report continues. “Land and infrastructure costs were to be paid through mortgages, but the lot price was set prematurely at P95/sq. m. Four years later when completed, the actual cost had risen threefold. In fact 90 percent of the residents could have afforded the real cost of P300, but instead paid only P95 and the rest was subsidized.”

Creative financing

Relief was given in all three versions of the contract in the event of delays. The Ramos administration, however, chose a nonadversarial solution—it rescued the project and, of necessity, R2 Builders, by devising an asset securitization plan for financing. R2 entered into an Asset Pool Arrangement with the NHA, the Philippine National Bank and the Home Insurance and Guarantee Corp. Government agencies—the SSS, Pagcor, OWWA, LandBank—pooled assets to finance the project. According to an OWWA fact sheet from 2003: “The PNB functioned as a special-purpose vehicle where project properties and values were conveyed into the trust fund, against which security instruments called the Smokey Mountain Project Participation Certificates (SMPPCs) would be issued. These were issued and sold to the institutional and individual investors to obtain the required funds. The SMPPCs were to be redeemed or paid with revenues from the sale of the reclaimed lots.”

According to the OWWA fact sheet, the investors were the Social Security System (P1,039 million), OWWA Secretariat and OWWA-Medicare (P835 million), Land Bank of the Philippines (P124 million), HGC Abot Kaya Pabahay Fund (P350 million), Pagcor (P6 million), Philippine National Bank (P300 million), HGC Provident Fund (P30 million), and various private financial institutions with aggregate investments of P473 million.

SMPPCs were considered government securities, the OWWA fact sheet said. The certificates were insured and fully guaranteed by the Home Guaranty Corp.

The OWWA fact sheet cites a Department of Justice opinion of January 6, 1995, written by then-Justice Secretary Franklin M. Drilon, that the guaranty obligations incurred by the Home Guaranty Corp. by virtue of its charter carried with it the unqualified guaranty of the Philippine government.

This is the justice department’s opinion that former President Ramos has recently invoked in his defense, to seal the legality of the financing plan.

Interestingly, Drilon has sought to clarify this contention, explaining that the opinion he released was not on the Smokey Mountain project, but was a response to a general legal question posed by Wilfredo Hernandez, then-executive vice president and general manager of the HGC.

The formation of the asset pool is one of the most controversial aspects of the Smokey Mountain project. If the joint-venture agreements held the developer responsible for funding, why did the government intercede? 

Plain old luck?

The fates seem to have smiled on R2 Builders, giving it the ability to bounce back from controversy, or find generous rescuers for its projects at the eleventh hour.

In 2000, for instance, R2 was among nine bidders to build a landfill with a materials recovery facility. Although disqualified from this bidding reportedly owing to deficiencies in its technical proposal, it was awarded an interim contract by the MMDA to dispose of Metro Manila’s waste on Semirara Island, Antique, without a DENR-issued permit for the project. As a result, R2 barges filled with garbage were stranded in the waters off Semirara, following issuance of a temporary restraining order.

Santiago named other instances where the company put in a questionable performance.

“Apparently, they were given a contract to build low-cost housing units along the railway tracks, and that turned out to be a failure. Apparently a contract was given for development of an area near La Mesa Dam and [they] cut down lots of trees, which was not included in the contract.”

In the wake of recent calls to investigate the Smokey Mountain project, Sen. Sergio Osmeña 3rd started inquiries and discovered that in 1988, R2 Holdings, mother company of R2 Builders, had a mere half a million pesos in paid-up capital.

“How could a company with a paid-up capital of only P500,000 be given a project amounting to almost P5 billion?” Osmeña asked last week on the floor of the Senate.

When funding proved to be inadequate, the NHA conveyed more property into the asset pool. In August 2000 10 hectares were transferred to Harbor Center, a sister company of R2 Builders, under the umbrella group R2 Holdings. In exchange the asset pool got 60 percent of the voting shares of Harbor Center.

Romero now owns the majority shares in Harbor Center. Through a series of corporate transactions, he was able to increase the shares of R2 Builders to 28 percent, and R2 Holdings to 40 percent.

Continued tomorrow

Part 1 |Conclusion

    
 
 
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Francis Andaya, Judee Perculeza, Marizhen Doctora, Shey Silayan
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: