• P140 billion lost to traffic gridlock


    TRAFFIC jams do not only drain the patience of motorists and commuters. They drain the economy as well.

    According to a newly formed group calling itself The Red (Respect Equals Discipline), road congestion in Metro Manila can cost P140 billion a year in lost investments, reduced capital inflow and wastages.

    Group President Brian Galagnara cited previous studies that show “wastages” from traffic dwarfs the amounts lost to all fund irregularities combined, including the controversial pork barrel scam.

    “We share the country’s concern with the rampant misuse of public funds and understand why corruption is at center stage these days,” said Galagnara.

    “But after seeing the success of concerned citizens and collective action in the abolition of the pork barrel, we feel it is time to mobilize efforts to address a problem that has an even greater negative economic impact than corruption: traffic.”

    Galagnara said two studies quantified the financial impact of traffic in Metro Manila: a 1999 study by Japan International Cooperation Agency and the Department of Transportation and Communications and a 2011 study by the University of the Philippines National Center for Transportation Studies.

    “The findings of these studies are essentially the same. They peg the losses due to traffic at approximately P140 billion,” he said.

    “Direct losses are attributed to wasted gasoline, lost labor hours, employment of traffic aides and wasted electricity; the indirect losses refer to withdrawal of potential foreign investments, missed business opportunities and reduced capital inflow,” Galagnara said.

    These losses grow as traffic in the metropolis and other parts of the country worsens.

    “These are losses that should immediately be addressed because traffic is getting worse by the day due to our inaction,” he pointed out.

    Lack of discipline
    Galagnara said his group will “go beyond finger-pointing and focus on doable solutions that would involve the participation of all the stakeholders affected by traffic: everyone.”

    “Like corruption, traffic is something that affects us all, rich or poor. Even the powerful are powerless when our roads are clogged,” he said.

    Galagnara said there are too many cars and not enough roads.

    “But what makes things worse is our lack of discipline on the roads, a lack of respect for each other,” he said.

    To make matters worse, traffic enforcers are not properly trained in traffic management.

    “Why [do]Filipinos observe traffic rules when abroad or in places like Subic?” Galagnara said.

    One study named the top four congestion-causing factors as public utility vehicle behavior; turn-lane behavior; intersection behavior; and pedestrian behavior.

    Another study listed the top five traffic violations by Filipino motorists as beating the red light; violation of no u-turn rules; violation of no loading and unloading rules; speeding; and violation of one-way rules.

    “Our belief is that a significant step towards solving the traffic problem begins with each one of us. Our call to action, then, is to foster discipline by emphasizing respect for others, so we want to tell everyone “Huwag kang Baboy! [Don’t be a hog!]” Galagnara said.

    Economic Planning Secretary Arsenio Balisacan admitted the need to build more infrastructure.

    “We have a huge backlog in almost all types of infrastructure. The government intends to invest in more roads, bridges, railways, airports and seaports during the remainder of President Benigno Aquino 3rd’s term.”

    But according to RED, building additional infrastructure is a good start but the solution must not end there. It emphasized that the people are part of the solution—traffic enforcers, drivers and commuters.


    Please follow our commenting guidelines.


    1. Cesar M. Mogol on

      I agree that discipline is foremost. Political will
      to impose strict penalty to violators is necessary
      also considering the motorists character
      and behavior.

      Another issue is looking at traffic routes which
      should be converted to one way or closure.
      Whoever thought of closing the u-turn under
      the Buendia-EDSA fly-over should be acknowledged .
      Why can’t they do that as well to the street between
      ADB and Megamall during rush hours? There
      are lots of streets that branch out along EDSA.
      Why not close some of these during rush hours
      or convert to one – way streets?

    2. Thinking Pinoy on

      Traffic management in Metro Manila is under the authority of the MMDA, but becuase of incompetence and corruption the agency has failed to do it mandate. Despite of the different traffic programs introduced by the current leadership using millions of tax payers money the metro manilans barely see any improvement on the traffic situation in fact traffic congestion continues to worsen. Worst, congress is not interested in looking into the problem. of course the LTFRB’s failure to get rid of colorum buses and jeepeneys is also a factor.

    3. Some cities in the uk give preference to mass transport, like busses as they carry so many passengers but cars can mant times carry only 1. This country needs to put people before cars but the rich dont use busses so they cater for them. It was so strange when they stopped busses going through manila but allowed cars. You need to move the masses not the individual. If busses had right of way more would use them & cars would be off the road & traffic would ease but you also need proper enforcement of all traffic rules.