Palace justifies postponement of DAP oral debate

3

Malacañang on Friday defended its move to again defer the presentation of its defense on the legality of the Aquino government’s controversial Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP).

Speaking to reporters, Palace deputy spokesman Abigail Valte said that the government needs more time to prepare the documents to be submitted by the Department of Budget and Management for the debate.

The Palace, through the Office of the Solicitor General, earlier asked the Supreme Court to move the second round of oral arguments from January 28 to March 25.

“This is to ensure that preparations for the oral arguments would be at that point where we are confident that we can amply defend the side of government,” Valte said in a press briefing.


She said that the government did not have enough time to prepare the documents as it was busy preparing for the 2014 national budget and efforts to provide immediate relief and rehabilitation to areas affected by calamities that hit the country last year.

“If you remember, Nagkaroon ng konting delay dahil meron tayong mga mas mga problemang na-prioritize noong end of the year [There was a delay because we had to face some problems that we had to prioritize at the end of the year],” Valte said

“So they needed a longer amount of time to be confident in their preparations,” she added.

Malacañang earlier said that the use of DAP is within the bounds of the law and the Constitution.

The DAP has become the center of controversy after Senator Jinggoy Estrada bared in a privilege speech the “incentives” of P50 million to each senator who voted to convict Justice secretary Renato Corona.

Budget Secretary Florencio Abad later admitted giving from P50 million to P100 million to each senator under the DAP but denied it has any connection with the ouster of Corona. AFP

Share.
.
Loading...

Please follow our commenting guidelines.

3 Comments

  1. Justice Roberto Abad is set to retire on May 22. Malacanang wants to postpone so this president can put another justice in the supreme court who is under his control to ensure DAP will not be ruled unconsitutional. Just another manipulation of the law by this administration.

  2. Malacanang is finding it hard to defend the indefensible, unconstitutional and criminal. Akala ki ba sabi ni Abnoy super legal ang DAP? Baka naman more pressure is being applied on the Supreme Court? Abnoy, Sereno, we are watching you.