PET resets hearing of Marcos poll case


The Presidential Electoral Tribunal (PET) on Tuesday postponed hearing for one week an election protest of Sen. Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. against Vice President Maria Leonor “Leni” Robredo.

The election protest of Marcos had been included in the agenda of the Supreme Court (SC) en banc sitting as PET on Tuesday.

According to SC sources, SC Associate Justice Alfredo Benjamin Caguioa asked that the case be called again when they are better prepared to tackle it.

The case had been raffled off to Caguioa.

It was learned that Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno and two associate justices were on leave.

On sabbatical leave was Justice Jose Catral Mendoza, who is set to retire next year.

Caguioa and former president Benigno Aquino 3rd were classmates from elementary school to college at the Ateneo de Manila University.

Before his appointment to the SC on January 22, 2016, Caguioa had been a law practitioner and became Aquino’s Chief Presidential Legal Counsel and then Justice secretary.

Robredo won against Marcos by more than 200,000 votes.

Marcos, son of the late strongman president Ferdinand Marcos, lodged his 1,000-page petition against Robredo, who was accused of conspiracy in allegedly the biggest election fraud in Philippine history.

He said accuracy of the poll results and reported irregularities should be probed through the immediate conduct of judicial revision/recount of the ballots and the examination, system audit and verification of the voter’s receipts, election returns and related election documents.



Please follow our commenting guidelines.


  1. Michael Cuanzon on

    We might as well damp the Comelec in the trash can and let the SET run the
    election, based on the bongbong petition.

  2. Pusong Pinoy on

    Pinostpone pa up to the last day ang filing, pero kahit na Supreme Court low-priority talaga ang waste of Taxpayers’ money ang na protest/filing na ito.

    Sayang talaga ang buwis na binayad ng taong bayan kung aaksayahin lang sa walang kuwenta’t walang ebidensiyang ‘protest’.

    • Hijo, there were more than enaf evidence to prove the allegation of wholesale cheating. Pero kyn ayaw talagang tingnan ang ebidensya, nasa justices na yun.

    • There were massive election fraud reported by reliable sources and it is proper to investigate who did the cheating and proclaim who the real winner as VP and if it will resolve this serious matter , then it is not a waste of taxpayers money .

    • As long as we find the truth behind the reported massive election fraud by Leni supporters , the LP , then it is worth spending taxpayers money for a good cause, otherwise many concerned and honest Filipinod will lose their trust in their govt, period.