PH maritime sector could see foreign investment


Bill would open PH public utilities to foreign funding, including maritime transport

Maritime transport companies in the Philippines could soon attract foreign investment, as a bill to ease restrictions and update statutory definitions of public utilities has advanced from the committee level at the House of Representatives.

House Bill 446, filed by Albay Rep. Joey Sarte Salceda, seeks to revise the 80-year-old Philippine Public Service Act.

Salceda said the bill is urgent, since it would liberalize the transport, telecom, and power industries and permit up to 100 percent foreign capitalization, which would break current monopolies in these sectors.

Lack of progress in these three vital industries “have stalled economic growth for so long,” said Salceda, senior vice chairman of the House Committee on Economic Affairs.

Both the private sector and government have endorsed the measure, including the Philippine Competition Commission, which asserted that one way of “promoting a competitive environment is to open fully the market to foreign players.”

Salceda said the proposed amendments will clarify the “ambiguities” in the statutory definition of public service and public utility, which he added have paved the way for oligarchs to monopolize the telecom, transport, and power industries for decades “to the detriment of consumers and the country.”

The bill, Salceda added, also seeks to address the “changes in the economic framework brought about by globalization and rapid technological innovations by adjusting the provisions of the law… and enable it to fulfill its purpose of truly serving the public.”

“Consumers often experience high prices and poor quality of basic services in the Philippines, because only a few local players and oligarchs effectively control the market. Competition and foreign investments are inhibited, because limitations that should only apply to the operation of a public utility are usually also applied to all public services,” he pointed out.

The situation, Salceda said, is primarily caused “by ambiguities in the definition of public utility that is often used interchangeably with public service under Commonwealth Act No. 146, and the key to fixing the problem is to develop a clear statutory definition of a public utility by amending the Public Service Act.”

The bill redefines public utility as “public service that regularly supplies the public and directly transmits and distributes … through a network, its commodity or service of public consequence.”

It also states that a public utility is “necessary to the public and a natural monopoly that needs to be regulated when the public interest so requires as determined by Congress.”

Categorized as public utilities under existing laws are electric power transmission, electric power distribution, water pipeline distribution, sewerage pipeline system, and such similar services.

Redefining public utility would also clarify the definition of public service, which applies to maritime and other transport services, loosening up restrictions on foreign ownership.

Commonwealth Act No. 146, which has already gone through several amendments, is considered “still a good law in terms of protecting public interest, albeit outdated in certain aspects,” Salceda said.

Amending the law will significantly contribute to increasing competition, as well as protecting the public interest, he said.

The Albay lawmakers explained, “more competition among providers would result in lower prices and improved quality of basic services in the Philippines, and help create a more competitive economy towards a better quality of life for all.”

The amendments include the transfer of certain functions, powers and duties of the Public Service Commission to various administrative agencies of the government, according to their respective jurisdictions.
These agencies include the Department of Transportation, Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board, Land Transportation Office, Civil Aeronautics Board, Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines, Philippine Ports Authority, Maritime Industry Authority, Philippine Coast Guard, Department of Information and Communications Technology, National Telecommunications Commission, Department of Energy, Energy Regulatory Commission, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, National Water Resources Board, Local Water Utilities Administration, Philippine Competition Commission, and others.


Please follow our commenting guidelines.

Comments are closed.