• Pistorius grilled over ‘terrible mistake’


    PRETORIA – Oscar Pistorius insisted Wednesday he never intended to kill his girlfriend, as the prosecution began tearing into his version of events on that fateful night.

    The 27-year-old Paralympian wrapped up three days of emotional and harrowing defense testimony by denying he wanted to kill girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp or the intruder he believed to be behind a toilet door in his home on the night of Valentine’s Day last year.

    “I did not intend to kill Reeva, milady, or anyone else,” he told the murder trial, in his strongest rebuttal yet of charges against him.

    Pistorius claims he mistook Steenkamp for an intruder.

    He faces a life sentence if convicted of her murder.

    But he could also face a murder charge if the prosecution shows he intended to kill when his life was not threatened — regardless of whether he knew who was behind the door.

    After Pistorius’s denial, prosecution lawyer Gerrie Nel began a searing cross-examination, immediately confronting Pistorius with the magnitude of his actions on February 14, 2013.

    After Pistorius conceded he made a terrible “mistake”, Nel — nicknamed “the bulldog” for his tenacious courtroom performance — was incredulous.

    “You made a mistake? You killed a person, that’s what you did!” he thundered.

    “You shot and killed her, won’t you take responsibility for that?”

    Pistorius’s cross-examination is expected to be a key point in his trial, a stern test of both his version of events and of his resolve.

    During five weeks of proceedings the world-famous athlete has appeared fragile, frequently crying in court and becoming physically sick when the gruesome details of Steenkamp’s injuries were discussed.

    He is likely to remain on the stand for the remainder of this week as his extensive testimony probed and picked at by Nel, who once successfully prosecuted a South African police commissioner.

    In calling Pistorius as a witness in his own defense, his handpicked legal team tried to counter the state’s portrayal of him as reckless and obsessed with fast cars and guns.

    Defense lawyer Barry Roux gently painted the portrait of a young man who likes dogs and carries out charitable acts, but who was marked by a fatherless childhood, the early death of his mother, physical disability and recurring crime.

    Pistorius had described how he met Steenkamp, a vivacious law graduate, and how they quickly grew closer and planned their future together.

    He demonstrated remorse by apologizing publically to Steenkamp’s family for what happened, a display that could be presented as a mitigating factor in any sentencing.

    Pistorius emotionally recounted how he “was overcome with fear,” when he believed an intruder was in his bathroom.

    “Before I knew it, I’d fired four shots at the door.”

    He later gave horrifying testimony about his vain attempts to stem the 29-year-old model’s blood loss and save her life using plastic bags and utility tape.

    “I was really trying to stop the bleeding, I was really trying to help Reeva breathe,” said Pistorius, still struggling to retain his composure.

    “I was trying to hold Reeva’s head with my hand to put pressure on it,” he said, outlining the brutal and ultimately fatal results of his gunshots to her hip, arm, hand and head.

    “Reeva had already died while I was holding her,” he said. “There was nothing more I could do for her.”

    Pistorius’s testimony also touched on three other unrelated charges: firing a gun through a moving car’s sunroof, then again in a crowded restaurant, and also the possession of illegal ammunition.

    He has pleaded not guilty to all the charges against him.

    Defense lawyer Barry Roux is expected to call up to 15 more witnesses in the remainder of the case, to testify on ballistics, urine emptying, damage to the toilet door, sound, and “disability and vulnerability”.

    Eventually set down for three weeks, the trial could run until mid-May, possibly even longer.



    Please follow our commenting guidelines.

    1 Comment

    1. I do believe that Mr. Pistorius has anger behavioral problem, with short fuse, perhaps related to his disability problem growing up, plus factors that may have influence him to love guns for defense, and among others. If he suspected an intruder with the gun on hand, looking around his girlfriend was not in bed, or he did not see her around, he suspected somebody in the bathroom, one would think of shouting, and calling her name if she was in the bathroom, before firing. Instead the neighbor testified that they heard a female voice, but not his voice. Bottom line, only him and God knows the truth. If he gets away with murder due seemingly convincing lies, he will have a tortured life, I do not know if that life is worth living. May God have mercy to Reeva and family and Mr. Pistorius remaining life.