Pope tells Europe leaders: ‘Man forgetting God leads to violence’ and ‘Arms race one of greatest curses’

5

IN a speech Tuesday to the European Union Parliament and later in another speech to the Council of Europe, Pope Francis—the first non-European head of the Roman Catholic Church in 1,200 years—reminded some of the most powerful persons in our planet that “man’s forgetfulness of God leads to violence” and told them that “the arms race is one of the greatest curses on humanity.”

In Strasbourg, France, Pope Francis said he came as a pastor with “a message of hope and encouragement to all the citizens of Europe.”

He said:

It is a message of hope, based on the confidence that our problems can become powerful forces for unity in working to overcome all those fears which Europe – together with the entire world – is presently experiencing. It is a message of hope in the Lord, who turns evil into good and death into life.


Pope Francis

Pope Francis

It is a message of encouragement to return to the firm conviction of the founders of the European Union, who envisioned a future based on the capacity to work together in bridging divisions and in fostering peace and fellowship between all the peoples of this continent. At the heart of this ambitious political project was confidence in man, not so much as a citizen or an economic agent, but in man, in men and women as persons endowed with transcendent dignity.

I feel bound to stress the close bond between these two words: “dignity” and “transcendent”.

“Dignity” was the pivotal concept in the process of rebuilding which followed the Second World War. Our recent past has been marked by the concern to protect human dignity, in constrast to the manifold instances of violence and discrimination which, even in Europe, took place in the course of the centuries. Recognition of the importance of human rights came about as the result of a lengthy process, entailing much suffering and sacrifice, which helped shape an awareness of the unique worth of each individual human person. This awareness was grounded not only in historical events, but above all in European thought, characterized as it is by an enriching encounter whose “distant springs are many, coming from Greece and Rome, from Celtic, Germanic and Slavic sources, and from Christianity which profoundly shaped them”,2 thus forging the very concept of the “person”.

Today, the promotion of human rights is central to the commitment of the European Union to advance the dignity of the person, both within the Union and in its relations with other countries. This is an important and praiseworthy commitment, since there are still too many situations in which human beings are treated as objects whose conception, configuration and utility can be programmed, and who can then be discarded when no longer useful, due to weakness, illness or old age.

In the end, what kind of dignity is there without the possibility of freely expressing one’s thought or professing one’s religious faith? What dignity can there be without a clear juridical framework which limits the rule of force and enables the rule of law to prevail over the power of tyranny? What dignity can men and women ever enjoy if they are subjected to all types of discrimination? What dignity can a person ever hope to find when he or she lacks food and the bare essentials for survival and, worse yet, when they lack the work which confers dignity?

Promoting the dignity of the person means recognizing that he or she possesses inalienable rights which no one may take away arbitrarily, much less for the sake of economic interests.

At the same time, however, care must be taken not to fall into certain errors which can arise from a misunderstanding of the concept of human rights and from its misuse. Today there is a tendency to claim ever broader individual rights; underlying this is a conception of the human person as detached from all social and anthropological contexts, as if the person were a “monad”, increasingly unconcerned with other surrounding “monads”. The equally essential and complementary concept of duty no longer seems to be linked to such a concept of rights. As a result, the rights of the individual are upheld, without regard for the fact that each human being is part of a social context wherein his or her rights and duties are bound up with those of others and with the common good of society itself.

I believe, therefore, that it is vital to develop a culture of human rights which wisely links the individual, or better, the personal aspect, to that of the common good, of the “all of us” made up of individuals, families and intermediate groups who together constitute society.3 In fact, unless the rights of each individual are harmoniously ordered to the greater good, those rights will end up being considered limitless and consequently will become a source of conflicts and violence.

To speak of transcendent human dignity thus means appealing to human nature, to our innate capacity to distinguish good from evil, to that “compass” deep within our hearts, which God has impressed upon all creation.4 Above all, it means regarding human beings not as absolutes, but as beings in relation. In my view, one of the most common diseases in Europe today is the loneliness typical of those who have no connection with others. This is especially true of the elderly, who are often abandoned to their fate, and also in the young who lack clear points of reference and opportunities for the future. It is also seen in the many poor who dwell in our cities and in the disorientation of immigrants who came here seeking a better future.

This loneliness has become more acute as a result of the economic crisis, whose effects continue to have tragic consequences for the life of society. In recent years, as the European Union has expanded, there has been growing mistrust on the part of citizens towards institutions considered to be aloof, engaged in laying down rules perceived as insensitive to individual peoples, if not downright harmful. In many quarters we encounter a general impression of weariness and aging, of a Europe which is now a “grandmother”, no longer fertile and vibrant. As a result, the great ideas which once inspired Europe seem to have lost their attraction, only to be replaced by the bureaucratic technicalities of its institutions.

Together with this, we encounter certain rather selfish lifestyles, marked by an opulence which is no longer sustainable and frequently indifferent to the world around us, and especially to the poorest of the poor. To our dismay we see technical and economic questions dominating political debate, to the detriment of genuine concern for human beings.5 Men and women risk being reduced to mere cogs in a machine that treats them as items of consumption to be exploited, with the result that – as is so tragically apparent – whenever a human life no longer proves useful for that machine, it is discarded with few qualms, as in the case of the terminally ill, the elderly who are abandoned and uncared for, and children who are killed in the womb.

* * *

The EU Parliament members applauded the Pope 14 times. They gave him a standing ovation after his address. He then departed to give his address to the Council of Europe.

The Council of Europe has 47 member states, of which 28 are members of the EU.

He told his audience, “ The Church is convinced that the arms race is one of the greatest curses on the human race and the harm it inflicts on the poor is more than can be endured.”

He also berated human` trafficking which “turns persons into merchandise for trade and deprives its victims of all dignity.”

Share.
.
Loading...

Please follow our commenting guidelines.

5 Comments

  1. The current Pope was extraordinary when he voiced quite passionately about genocide happening against Christians — in this year 2014, not in some distant past.

    The current Pope extraordinary in pointing to the religious tint to the happenings of mass murder and population expulsion in the Middle East.

    • Parang sinabi mo na ang lahat na nakaraan mga pope ay walanggggg!kakwenta-kwenta!at ang lahat ng mga pari na mga kasamahan niya! Dapat politics ang kinuha niya,dahil sa loob ng church walang masyadong naniniwala sa kanila!

    • Tungkol sa mga Katoliko na ang unang kasal ay pumaltos at nag-asawa ng pangalawa, mukhang the current Pope ay pabor na sa mga ganuong katoliko, dapat at tanggapin ng buo at pabayaang mag-kumunyon.
      Maari ding ang current Pope (katulad ng ibang mga Pope at maraming mga pari) ay pabor sa birth control. Pero marami din namang mga pari at obispo at mga cardinal, hindi pabor sa birth control. Pero malay mo…. baka sa susunod na taon.
      Pero ubod-rami ng mga pari at obispo ay balisang-balisa sa nangyayari sa Middle East at sa mga simbahang sinusunog.

  2. May Pope Francis’ messages to the EU and the Council of Europe leaders make them act on what he said.

    • Kung yung maraming pari ay laban sa gusto niya at maraming katoliko ang hindi alam ang paniniwala yan pa kayang may sariling pinaniniwalaan!
      Umasa ka pa sa mga ito!
      Wala ng natitirang katoliko sa Euro!