St. Peter’s Square teemed recently with believers witnessing the extraordinary canonization of two contemporary popes, John XXIII and John Paul II.
Americans who are critical of the church, its failings and even the sanctification process focus on recent scandals and exclusionary practices. Without minimizing these criticisms, there should also be a secular recognition of these two past popes’ international achievements, remembering that they both partnered with US presidents to change positively the course ofglobal events.
Whether helping to prevent a hot war or to end the Cold War, these twopopes worked with presidents John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan to achieve peaceful outcomes.
Pope Francis’ ascension to St. Peter’s throne creates unique opportunities for President Barack Obama to leverage a fresh, credible message of social justice and leadership aimed at Latin America. If pursued, it could be the latest colla–boration between a president and a pope, and potentially change the face of the Southern hemisphere.
Rome and Washington do not always see eye-to-eye, as during World War II or the two Vatican-opposed Iraq wars. But ever since Woodrow Wilson’s first meeting with Pope Benedict XV in 1919, shared foreign policy goals between the White House and Vatican have often achieved success.
In October 1962, John XXIII played an effective intermediary role between Kennedy andthen-Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev in the heat of the Cuban missile crisis. More recently, John Paul II was the unelected, morally superior Polish opposition leader in absentia. He offered hope, peaceful resistance and a path to freedom from Soviet captivity.
John Paul II did not act alone. As Carl Bernstein reported in “The Holy Alliance,” a 1992 Time magazine cover story, “Reagan and the Pope agreed to undertake a clandestine campaign to hasten the dissolution of the communist empire.” Together they succeeded.
It is easy to bristle at the idea of a religious leader conspiring with a US president. Faith in the US Constitution means for most a belief in the absolute separation of church and state. But church and state sometimes need to work together to change big things.
Change for Latin America
Today, there is an opportunity for positive change in Latin America. The region is rife with corrupt and powerful populists. Exploiting the weak and preying on their passions, some of these leaders were criticized years ago for their “exhi–bitionism” by the man who is now Pope Francis. The first Latin American pope’s influence among Catholics in the Americas is comparable to the first Polish pope’s popularity behind the Iron Curtain.
Where Francis is finding fertile ground, however, the heavy hand of United States’ past interventions is still felt throughout the continent. The 1973 Central Intelligence Agency actions against Chile’s Salvador Allende or the more recent Washington support for opponents of Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez still whips people up down south.
Grenada, Cuba, Panama, Nicaragua, Guatemala, El Salvador, Mexico, Bolivia, Colombia—there’s a long list of countries where the United States has engaged directly either in war, supported authoritarian regimes, overthrown leaders, secretly armed groups, or feigned ignorance of death squads.
Throughout the region, the United States propped up reprehensible military leaders and created long-lasting resentments. Uncle Sam became an easy target for anti-Yankee rhetoric and attitudes.
Today, despite wariness toward US engagement, there is still an opportunity to confront and counter new challenges and foreign alliances being forged in Latin America. Both the passage of time and President Obama’s light touch play a role in softening the Yank’s image. During his recent Asia trip, the president characterized his foreign policy approach as hitting singles and doubles. “Every once in a while, we may be able to hit a home run,” he said.
It may now be time to swing for the fences and for Washington to increase quiet coordination with the Vatican. The president shares a passion and a purpose with Pope Francis. They are both committed to combating inequality. Francis offers a credible alternative voice to the loud populist leaders who trade on angry rhetoric to achieve authoritarian rule. A more prosperous and equitable Latin America would be a homer.