STOP EDCA, HIGH COURT URGED

3

A group led by former senators Rene Saguisag and Wigberto Tañada on Monday petitioned the Supreme Court (SC) to halt the implementation of the controversial enhanced defense cooperation agreement (Edca) signed recently between the Philippines and the United States.

Advertisements

In a petition for certiorari and prohibition with prayer for a preliminary prohibitory injunction and/or temporary restraining order, the group urged the High Court to stop the Department of Budget and Management from releasing funds for the implementation of Edca. They said the agreement violates the 1987 Constitution and is “grossly disadvantageous and contrary to the national interest.”

The petitioners asked the SC to permanently prohibit the government from funding and implementing Edca, pointing out that it is a treaty that requires Senate concurrence.

The other petitioners were Francisco “Dodong” Nemenzo Jr., Sr. Mary John Mananzan, Pacifico Agabin, Esteban “Steve” Salonga, Harry Roque Jr., Evalyn Ursua, Edre Olalia, Dr. Carol Pagaduan-Araullo, Roland Simbulan and Teodoro Casiño.

The respondents include Executive Secretary Paquito Ochoa Jr., Defense Secretary Voltaire Gazmin, Foreign Affairs Secretary Albert del Rosario and Armed Forces of the Philippines Chief of Staff Gen. Emmanuel Bautista.

“The acts of public respondents, if not immediately restrained or enjoined, will cause grave and irreparable injury to petitioners, as Filipino citizens, and taxpayers, as the implementation or impending implementation of the unconstitutional provisions of Edca shall violate the fundamental law of the Republic of the Philippines,” the petitioners said.

For the same reasons, they added, the commission and continuance of the implementation of Edca during the pendency of their petition will bring injustice to the petitioners and the nation.

Hence, if the implementation of Edca is not immediately enjoined, the petitioners warned that they and millions of Filipinos “will suffer great or irreparable injury before the matter can be heard by the [SC].”

On September 16, 1991, despite pressure from the executive branch and the US government itself, and risking their political careers, 12 senators rejected a proposed Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Peace that would have extended to another 10 years the Subic Naval Base in Zambales province (at this point, the Clark Air Force Base in Pampanga had already been closed due to the eruption of Mount Pinatubo).

The Senate, led by then Senate President Jovito R. Salonga, voted 12-11 against the proposed treaty, thus ending 470 years of foreign military presence in the Philippines.

According to the petitioners, Edca “is a clear departure from and reversal of the stand taken by the Philippine Senate in 1991.”

“Its terms and conditions put the country in an even worse situation than what would have transpired if the Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Peace that was sent to the Senate for ratification had not been rejected,” they said.

The petitioners claimed that the executive “has circumvented the correct and brave stand taken by the Philippine Senate in 1991 in refusing to renew the bases treaty by illegally entering” into the Edca.

The new agreement “will allow the US government to use Philippine military bases, essentially allowing them to build structures; store as well as preposition weapons, defense supplies and materiel; station troops, civilian personnel and defense contractors; and transit and station vehicles, vessels and aircraft. This will effectively allow them to establish and operate de facto military bases anywhere on Philippine soil, minus the cost of paying for one.”

Share.
loading...
Loading...

Please follow our commenting guidelines.

3 Comments

  1. This people should be brought to Malacanang to have a security briefing so they will cease complaining. Look at the current scenarios….A fishing boat from Vietnam was recently sunk by a Chinese ship in their own territorial waters. China is occupying our remote islands and fishing in our own backyards with no respect of international maritime laws. They are starting to build oil rigs in our territory and the rest of South East Asia waters.
    Then show morons our inventories and our wares and equipment to defend ourselves against a Giant Red Dragon like Communist China .Finally ask them if they have any immediate solution to resolve this problem other than EDCA. and how they are going to fund it?
    How stupid could these Patriots be. Reminds me of the quote from President Quezon that he would rather see the Philippines run like Hell than being run by the Americans.He got what he wished for. Stupid Patriots……..

  2. Pete Gabriel on

    Here we go again. Let’s have a reality check, the Philippines do not have a chance in hell against the aggressive tactics that China is using to grab our territories. If there is anything illegal here it is China building military bases in our own backyard. You people are barking at the wrong tree!

  3. With due respect to the magnificent 12, how are you going to defend the Philippine territory without EDCA? are you allied with the enemy of the Republic? are you part of the solution or part of the problem? In 1991 when you abrogated the American bases in the country, nobody was trying to grab the country’s territories then, now is a different time. The country’s enemy is building an air strip with in your territory, why are you not vigorously resisting it, you make suspicious, is this constitutional? Majority of Filipinos are suspicious about your group. How I wish I could turn back the clock, before the country gained its independence to have a plebiscite for the whole country to vote for independence vs. for the country to become one of the states of America, which one you think will win? You have a lot of explaining to do, to the majority of Filipinos, why you want to do away with EDCA, when the American presence in the country is an asset for the country’s defense and help in times of calamity. May God bless the country and people.