Moving from revelation to evolution as the basis of one’s understanding of the human world makes ambiguous the place of morality. Consequently, morality’s grounding and terms often seem to rest upon no more than the need for cooperation in order to sustain society, which is not morality at all but rather necessity and self-interest. Naturally we wish to survive and wish for some others to survive with us—the two being linked—but what moral valence does this wish have in a non-religious universe? If we admit utilitarianism and pluralism, does it make impossible any absolute terms with which to construct conceptions of good and evil?
Already have an active account? Log in here.
Continue reading with one of these options:
Continue reading with one of these options:
Premium + Digital Edition
Ad-free access
P 80 per month
(billed annually at P 960)
- Unlimited ad-free access to website articles
- Limited offer: Subscribe today and get digital edition access for free (accessible with up to 3 devices)
TRY FREE FOR 14 DAYS
See details
See details
If you have an active account, log in
here
.