STOCKHOLM: Nobel prize season starts on Monday with speculation rife that the peace prize could go to US whistleblower Edward Snowden, Pakistani girls’ education campaigner Malala Yousafzai, or perhaps Pope Francis.
Last year, the physics prize awarded to Peter Higgs and Francois Englert for the Higgs particle was widely predicted, but Nobel pundits and bookmakers tend to focus more on who will get the prestigious peace and literature awards.
This year saw a record 278 peace prize nominations and, while the list is secret, some names have been revealed by their sponsors, including US whistleblower Edward Snowden, who was nominated by two Norwegian members of parliament.
Kristian Berg Harpviken, director of the Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO) is one of few experts to publish an annual shortlist of likely winners, even if he has yet to predict one accurately.
This year he ranked Snowden second place – behind Pope Francis – for exposing the extent of US electronic surveillance. However, he acknowledged that the former intelligence analyst would be a controversial choice as “many continue to see him as a traitor and a criminal.”
Nonetheless the five members of the Nobel Committee could award Snowden – considered a fugitive by the US and living in exile in Russia – to “underline the independence of the Nobel Committee” from the Norwegian and US authorities, according to Nobeliana.com, a website run by leading Norwegian Nobel historians.
Others have rubbished the Snowden speculation.
“It would be really courageous to give it to Snowden,” Robert Haardh, head of Stockholm-based Civil Rights Defenders told Agence France-Presse.
“But judging from the past, I can’t see that coming. It’s too controversial—and Scandinavians are too fond of the [United] States,” he added.
Pope Francis—topping bookmaker Paddy Power’s list with 9/4 odds—would be another controversial choice.
“The massively unjust global distribution of wealth is detrimental to peace. Pope Francis
has brought attention to the fate of the poor, and the need for a new approach to development and economic redistribution,” according to the PRIO director’s prediction.
Critics point out that a papal Nobel would cause a similar outcry to US President Barack Obama’s 2009 Nobel – less than a year into his presidency—which led to complaints that he was awarded for potential good deeds in the future rather than anything he had achieved.
Other favorites, also tipped last year, were 17-year-old Malala Yousafzai – the Pakistani activist for girls’ right to education who was wounded by the Taliban in 2012—and Congolese doctor Denis Mukwege.
The Nobel could also go to a champion of democracy and human rights in Russia, such as the opposition newspaper Novaya Gazeta—co-founded by Mikhail Gorbachev in 1993 with part of his peace prize money—or to human rights activist Ales Bialiatski from the Russian-backed dictatorship Belarus.
“This year has been marked by a lot of drama. It can mean the list will look different,” Harpviken told Norwegian news agency NTB, adding that he believed the committee would search for a laureate linked to major upheavals and conflicts of the last year.
“But that does not necessarily mean that they will find any,” he added, echoing the view of
several analysts that the ongoing wars in the Middle East and Ukraine do not easily lend themselves to a peace prize.
Just over a week ahead of the October 10 announcement, Harpviken told NTB he was planning to update his forecast.
Last year, the Peace Prize went to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons.
The literature prize is no less difficult to predict.
Once again the Japanese author Haruki Murakami is the bookmakers’ favorite—with 5/1 odds at Ladbrokes—but literary critics are less confident about his chances.
“Murakami is probably a readers’ favorite and certainly popular with many journalists, but he lacks that extra depth,” said Elise Karlsson, literary critic with Swedish daily Svenska Dagbladet.