Sunday, October 25, 2020
Home Opinion Editorial The folly of fuel subsidies

The folly of fuel subsidies


AS oil revisits the record-high of 2008, it has become fashionable to debate over whether or not to impose price controls, and whether or not to extend subsidies to the poor.
The debate becomes more querulous since more expensive crude cascades into higher prices of other commodities, including food.
The government, the business community, and orthodox economists are one in dismissing price controls as counterproductive, supposedly worse than the problem they are aimed at solving.
To rehearse the argument, price controls create artificial shortages, since other things being equal, producers would rather not sell at a loss, especially if demand is strong. The shortage encourages a black market to emerge for the commodity whose price is controlled. As a black market, the price is set erratically, sometimes at rocket-high levels to reflect the pent-up demand for the controlled commodity.
In any event, the non-poor are the heaviest users of oil, thus only this group stands to benefit from any price control. So far, so good.
But in the same breath, those who argue against price controls also push for fuel subsidies for the poor—and herein lay the problem.
The argument for subsidizing the poor’s fuel consumption rests on the assumption that more expensive oil would leave them with little to spend on more essential items such as food, health care, education, among others.
The trouble with this line of thinking is that the poor, having been spared from the burden of costlier fuel, have no incentive to economize on this commodity.
Witness here the hordes of public utility vehicles (PUVs)—jeeps, buses, and tricycles—that have apportioned for themselves lanes upon lanes of otherwise public roads while waiting for commuters to emerge from their places of work or school, or to alight from the overhead trains.
As if the public nature of these infrastructures gave PUVs the license to transform these roads into terminals and parking lots!
In appropriating the roads, PUV drivers not only clog up byways and constrain access by other motorists. Worse, PUV drivers leave their engines idle, wasting so many liters of fuel and in the process generating pollution. Imagine the health costs not only on the drivers, but also on commuters, who include children.
Especially in the case of a commodity like oil, a free market characterized by rising prices naturally bring down demand, thus helping reduce the aforementioned externalities.
Besides pollution and its consequences on the health of people and the environment, irresponsible consumption of oil leads to the waste of this fossil fuel, as well as of scarce foreign exchange that could have been used for other more productive activities.
And all because the government and oil companies grant the “poor” PUV drivers—and by extension, their operators—fuel subsidies.
Another problem with subsidizing only the poor’s fuel use is that this policy is blind to the differential impact of rising oil prices on members of the so-called non-poor.
The non-poor is not solely the rich
Counting among the non-poor—and comprising the bulk of them—is the middle class, whose numbers increased throughout the country’s recent growth spurt alongside the boom in the overseas Filipino worker diaspora.
By lumping them with the rich, the middle class suffers from rising fuel prices in more ways than one. As members of the non-poor, the middle class help pay for the fuel consumption of the poor under the oil companies’ cross-subsidy pricing scheme.
Many members of the middle-class are also subject to the withholding tax system, thus, unlike the rich, see their incomes reduced every month automatically. For like the poor, many in the middle class don’t have price escalation clauses in their work contracts, leaving the latter equally vulnerable to inflation.
Now a portion of the taxes withheld from the middle class find their way into financing the government’s outright subsidies for the poor. The irony of it all is that, with the government faced with a budget deficit, public services availed of by the middle class not only enjoy no subsidy, but are usually subject to rate increases to plug the fiscal gap.
So it’s not the poor who end up with the short end of the stick during rising oil prices. At least they have subsidies. Not so for the middle class.


Assunta de Rossi gives birth to ‘miracle baby’

ACTRESS Assunta de Rossi gave  birth to a healthy baby girl on Friday morning at the age of 37. Named Guilia Florentina Alessandra, De Rossi...

Buehler dominant as Dodgers seize 2-1 World Series lead

ARLINGTON: Los Angeles pitcher Walker Buehler added another impressive performance to his resume Friday, dominating on the mound to propel the Dodgers to a...

Palace asks Red Cross to resume Covid-19 testing services

MALACANANG has urged the Philippine Red Cross (PRC) to resume its coronavirus testing as it reiterated President Rodrigo Duterte's commitment to pay the debt...

Al Quinn, veteran TV and stage director, dies at 86

VETERAN director for stage, movie, television and commercials, Al Quinn, (born Alcuin Gargaritano Pastrano) died on Saturday morning. He was 86. Singer-songwriter and actor Ogie...

One stages events elsewhere in Asia, not PH

ONE Championship is set to have its biggest event yet next Friday, October 30 as the One: Inside the Matrix showcases stacked match cards. And as...


Today's Front Page