25 C
Friday, February 21, 2020
Home Op-Ed Columns Opinion on Page One Trump’s two great miscalculations – in one week

Trump’s two great miscalculations – in one week



First, President Trump undermined trade talks in Shanghai. Then the US Treasury declared China a ‘currency manipulator.’ The miscalculations will prove costly in the coming trade and currency wars.

LAST Thursday, China’s central bank set the midpoint for the yuan’s trading band above 7 to the US dollar for the first time since the 2008 global crisis. That was slightly firmer than expected, boosting most currencies in the region.

In recent years, the impact of the yuan on other regional currencies has been increasing and occasionally outweighed that of the US dollar.

In the first half of the year — prior to the Bangko Sentral’s recent rate cut — the Philippine peso appreciated more than 2.8 percent against the US dollar, ranking among the most stable currencies in the region.

In the future, the US-Sino trade war could contribute to a weaker peso, however. That friction has now moved to a new level after, in barely a week, President Trump managed to miscalculate twice.

Divisions at White House and Fed
On the eve of the recent trade talks in Shanghai, Trump’s tweets undermined the meeting before it even began. Afterwards in the Oval Office, Trump overruled his advisers to ramp up tariffs on China. Reportedly, the decision ensued after a heated debate in which he insisted levies would force China to comply with US demands.

Except for Peter Navarro, Trump’s China-bashing trade adviser, Trump’s highest-level team adamantly objected to the tariffs. That spurred an intense debate lasting nearly two hours. Trump desperately needed secured commitments that China would boost the purchases of US agricultural exports; and he saw tariffs as the best bullying tactic. Eventually, Trump’s advisers gave in and helped him to draft the tweet announcing an extension of tariffs to essentially all Chinese imports.

Soon thereafter, the US Treasury Department declared China a currency manipulator and threatened to “engage with the International Monetary Fund” to stop the Chinese yuan from gaining “unfair advantage” in trade. That designation does not reflect economic realities, but political desperation, however. Neither the IMF (nor the US Treasury) has expressed concerns about Chinese currency manipulation for a long while. The Chinese yuan joined the IMF’s international reserve currencies a few years ago; and more recently, China has joined vital global benchmark indices.

Conversely, in the US, the political background forces behind the recent Fed rate cut, which did weaken the US dollar, have given rise to high-level concerns about the Fed’s independence, as evidenced by the recent Wall Street Journal op-ed by former Fed chairs Paul Volcker, Ben Bernanke and Janet Yellen.

Trump’s tariffs undermine cheaper dollar and rising equities
True, the US administration desperately needs a cheaper dollar. Yet, Trump’s tariff wars and geopolitical ploys (e.g., Iran, Venezuela, new cold war against Russia) work against such goals.

Before the summer, the White House increased tariffs to 25 percent from 10 percent on $200 billion of Chinese goods, while targeting another $300 billion worth of Chinese imports for potential punitive tariffs.

Unsurprisingly, the renminbi depreciated from 6.7 to more than 6.9 against the US dollar, mainly on renewed trade tensions.

China retaliated by imposing duties on $60 billion of US goods, starting June 1. China could have retaliated harder, but opted for a mild response to keep the door open for trade talks.

Until Trump’s tariff escalation, the Chinese renminbi was around 6.80 against the US dollar. But that was predicated on the idea that cooler heads would prevail in the White House and a broad-scale trade war was avoidable. When Trump opted for tariff escalation, markets reacted expectedly. By the summer, the appreciation of the Chinese yuan was reversed. Things were about to get tougher.

As the collateral damage of the US tariffs began to spread in the US economy in the summer, Trump largely ignored the economic impact of the trade friction. Naively, he thought that the Fed’s rate cut (which he expected to result in new cuts over the fall) would accommodate his trade policy. Emboldened, he opted for the “more tariffs and still more tariffs” stance.

In the past few days, the market response has been dramatic, however. Following the Shanghai talks and the new tariff escalation, US stocks plunged on prospects of a prolonged trade fight, and business groups warned about the impact on consumer spending.

Indeed, Trump’s tariffs have paced the renminbi fluctuations ever since the start of his trade wars (see figure).

Interplay of Trump’s tariffs, US equities and Chinese yuan

Political pretexts vs economic realities
In light of the economic realities, the US Treasury’s claim that China is depreciating the Chinese yuan is simply flawed. In fact, depreciation is what China seeks to avoid. When exports shrink, a light depreciation of the currency is of no help. And if the yuan would depreciate significantly in a short period of time, it would foster worries about capital flight.

Paradoxically, the more the Trump administration will escalate the trade wars, the more likely it is that US dollar will push the yuan closer to 7 per US dollar or beyond it, as I projected last May in The Manila Times. While that may impair market sentiment in China in the short term, it is likely to cause collateral damage in the US stock market, as evidenced by recent market volatility.

The Trump administration’s yuan allegations are motivated by political objectives, not by economic realities.

What President Trump needs for his domestic initiatives is a cheaper dollar and soaring equities. What his miscalculations have caused is precisely the reverse.

Dr. Dan Steinbock is the founder of Difference Group. He has served at India, China and America Institute (US), Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (China) and the EU Center (Singapore). For more, see https://www.differencegroup.net/

Immigration exec confirms ‘pastillas’ operation, competition among syndicates at NAIA

AN immigration officer on Thursday claimed that some syndicates at the airport and Bureau of Immigration (BI) competed for “grease money” being offered by...

Court junks 9 falsification cases vs Sajid Ampatuan

THE Sandiganbayan's Sixth Division threw out nine falsification cases filed against Mayor Sajid Ampatuan of Shariff Saydona Mustapha town in Maguindanao. The cases were among...

Duterte relieves Immigration officials, employees  in ‘pastillas’ bribery scheme

PRESIDENT Rodrigo Duterte ordered the relief of all officials and employees of the Bureau of Immigration (BI) over the alleged "pastillas" bribery scheme involving...

House OKs on second reading bill increasing employees’ annual leave 

THE House of Representatives approved on second reading a bill increasing mandatory paid annual leave of employees from five to 10 days annually. House Bill 1338 seeks...

Dela Rosa ‘regrets’ US visa cancellation but bears ‘no ill will’

SEN. Ronald "Bato" Dela Rosa regretted the cancellation of his United States (US) visa and consequently, the loss of a long relationship but maintained that...

Today’s Front Page February 21, 2020

Today’s Front Page February 21, 2020