IT is a mind-boggling concern why some of the laws of the land have not been enforced properly or their corresponding implementing rules and regulations (IRR) not promulgated.

Does it mean that our lawmakers in the past had overlooked its adverse effects now or in the future? Does it mean that agencies concerned to implement the law and promulgate its IRR didn’t have a chance to plan to do it, had no topnotch lawyers in their office to support their head of agencies, or that the head of their agencies simply do not want to do it? In another angle, why do some people in our government agencies have this don’t-care attitude that has made corruption in their offices a corporate culture? What influenced them? Why were other countries able to keep corruption at the minimum, if not eliminated it, or their officials pleaded guilty or committed suicide when their “righteous” conscience told them so?

Premium + Digital Edition

Ad-free access


P 80 per month
(billed annually at P 960)
  • Unlimited ad-free access to website articles
  • Limited offer: Subscribe today and get digital edition access for free (accessible with up to 3 devices)

TRY FREE FOR 14 DAYS
See details
See details