Sunday, November 22, 2020
 

Development priorities have shifted to saving lives and livelihoods

 

Latest Stories

Ex-Jolo police chief in Army intel ‘shooting’ gunned down

THE former chief of police of Jolo, Sulu was gunned down in Sultan Mastura town in Maguindanao on Saturday...

WATCH: Falling Beams

https://youtu.be/7Aq8ejVjmM0

DILG releases P1.5B for typhoon-affected LGUs

THE Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) released a total of P1.5 billion to local government units (LGUs) heavily...

DILG directs crackdown on illegal logging, mining after ‘Ulysses’ onslaught

INTERIOR Secretary Eduardo Año ordered a crackdown against illegal logging and mining in the aftermath of the onslaught caused by...

Dela Rosa tests positive for Covid-19

SEN . Ronald “Bato” Dela Rosa on Saturday confirmed that he had contracted the 2019 coronavirus disease (Covid-19). “I’m sorry...

By Hugh Hilton Todd

UNITED NATIONS: We have come to the point in the agenda where we must take a “deep dive” in reviewing the lessons learned, so far, in our response to the Covid-19 pandemic in order to chart a way for the future. But the future, by its very definition, must be relative. Flexibility and change will define policy making and the scope of action needed for development.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), confirmed cases of Covid-19 now exceed 44.8 million worldwide with over 1 million deaths as of Oct. 30, 2020. The human toll of death and destruction has been staggering.

We commend the speed of global collaboration in the search for vaccines, particularly through the Access to Covid-19 Tools (ACT) Accelerator initiative of GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance, and the WHO, with the hope that it will benefit all countries.




We also note the good news of support for the building up of manufacturing capabilities, the maintenance of global supply chains, and plans for the distribution of up to 2 billion doses of vaccine by the end of 2021, once initial testing is completed — through the Covax Facility.

The Covid-19 pandemic has exposed the weaknesses of our public health systems, putting immense strain on health care provision, and widening socioeconomic divides. In short order, our development priorities shifted to the immediate task of saving lives and livelihoods.

Rapid building up of capacity for the effective distribution of social services became imperative in the face of deepening inequalities, increased gender-based violence, and greater vulnerability among children, youth and marginalized households. But we cannot relent in our primary aim to eradicate poverty and inequality.

Extreme poverty

The United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, or Undesa, estimates that over 34 million people globally will be pushed into extreme poverty this year alone. Some consider this an optimistic forecast, with the World Bank projecting that between 71 million and 100 million people will be pushed into extreme poverty this year.

One thing is certain, that the gains of development of the past decades, and the progress made in the fight against extreme poverty have been eroded.

The social cost of the Covid-19 pandemic is unfathomable or incomprehensible. Children in poor households suffer disproportionately from the closure of schools, with limited or often no access to digital learning facilities and often missing out on school feeding initiatives.

The World Bank estimates that school closures could cause over 7 million students to discontinue their education, drastically increasing their chances of living in poverty. An additional 10 million children globally could face acute malnutrition, with a doubling of the number of people facing acute food insecurity in 2020 relative to 2019.

Globally, 243 million women and girls aged 15 to 49 have been subjected to sexual and/or physical violence perpetrated by an intimate partner in the previous 12 months. The number is likely to increase as security, health and money worries heighten tensions and strains are accentuated by cramped and confined living conditions.

Our policy response has evolved, firstly, around the need to save lives and provide critical household support; secondly, in maintaining financial stability; and thirdly, in providing liquidity and other support to business, particularly small and medium enterprises.

Global GDP contraction

Estimates of global GDP contraction in 2020 range from 3.2 percent to 5.2 percent — potentially the largest contraction in economic activity since the Great Depression. For regions like my own, this contraction is estimated to be 8.1 percent, with our Caricom Small Island Developing States bearing the brunt of this, given the heavy reliance on tourism and services.

In the informal sector, including the gig economy, up to 1.6 billion people are estimated to be at risk of losing their livelihoods, according to the International Labor Organization.

Many lack access to any form of social protection and youths are more likely to be in informal employment and in most cases are unemployed when compared to adults.
Again, Latin America and the Caribbean experienced a 20 percent contraction in employment in the second quarter of 2020 alone.

Not only are our governments forced to consider shifts in policy priorities, but there are clear signs of even greater shifts by our development partners. An estimated $10 trillion was spent by G-20 developed economies in Covid-19 stimulus packages, in the first few months of the pandemic. McKinsey and Company reports that Japan has spent ¥117.1 trillion, equivalent to 21 percent of its gross domestic product.

And Germany reportedly spent 33 percent of its gross domestic product on Covid-19 rescue programs, compared to 5.5 percent for Brazil, 10 percent for India and 8.6 percent for South Africa. At issue is, of course, the limited policy space available to G77 countries.

Limited scope

The upshot of this is that the liquidity to weather this storm is severely lacking in many of our countries. With limited scope for raising revenue, coupled with contracting economic activity, we have found ourselves mainly reliant on access to financial flows from international financial institutions. Sadly, this access is severely restricted for most of our members due to outmoded systems of classification.

Official development assistance — ODA — could be the most assured form of financial support in our response to the pandemic and in our efforts to rebuild economic and social structures. We know that official development assistance volumes declined in 2018 and 2019, and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development has recognized that the need for concessional development finance like official development assistance is unparalleled in 2020, in response to Covid-19.

Now more than ever, we call on our developed partners to honor the commitment to increase ODA flows as a percent of gross national income.

Trade as an engine of growth is especially tenuous, with the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (Unctad) estimating that Covid-19 could trigger as much as $50 billion in export losses across global value chains.

Many of our countries are heavily reliant on remittance flows, which are expected to decline
by 20 percent for this year. Unctad also projects a decline in foreign direct investment of between 40 and 50 percent in the 2020-2021 period.

These factors put together, make a compelling case for greater international solidarity and cooperation. We must refocus our attention on implementing the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, in this Decade of Action and Delivery of sustainable development.

Collectively, we must redouble our efforts to eradicate poverty and inequality, deal with the impacts and threat of climate change and work towards achieving the 17 interconnected and indivisible Sustainable Development Goals.

The frameworks exist. But accelerated implementation will require the requisite financing, and, as always, the political will, to give meaningful effect to our aspirations.


The 134-member Group of 77, and China, is the largest single coalition of developing countries in the United Nations, currently chaired by the Republic of Guyana.

This article is from the address by Hugh Hilton Todd, Minister for Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of the Co-operative Republic of Guyana, to the 44th annual meeting of foreign ministers of the Group of 77 and China, on the thematic debate on “Global response to the Covid-19 pandemic and the obstacles it poses to the implementation of the 2030 Agenda and achievement of the SDGs.”



 
 

Weather

Today's Frontpage

TRY OUR DIGITAL EDITION
FREE FOR 30 DAYS

ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?